100m budget for 2019 Summer window

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
Yes, that would be how much we owe on the balance sheet, but the annual cost to the profit and loss account is spread over the contracts through the amortisation line.

If we spent £1bn this summer, we wouldn't book a £1bn 'loss' in this years profit and loss account, it would be more like £200m (amortisation).
And what you are describing, assets amortization, doesn't represent the "transfer spend". In this case it is simply an accounting practice that spreads the cost over the life of the asset which means that for example when players extend their contracts it alters the amortization. In the club's consolidated financial statement, transfer fees are in the Trade and other payables section and specifically included in trade payables.
 

Reincarnated

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 26, 2019
Messages
24
Amazing to think that we haven't learnt from previous years. To not to have signed a starting 11 player yet astounds me.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,839
We spent less than 80m last season so yeah won't surprise me much if that's true.
That's what I'm thinking.
Had the same story been printed last Summer, fans on this forum would not have believed it, even though it would later turn out to be true.

At this stage, I have no idea what to believe. Woodward is trying to save money - I know that for a fact. So this would fit in with Woodward's planning.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,278
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Given our time restraints, it's 37 days before the window closes (1st August right?).

I would focus on signing AWB (he's overpriced for his ability but we've spent way too long to give up now).
I'd also sign Bruno Fernandes (again another player like AWB we've spent so much time chasing him we just need to get it done and move on).
I'd then focus all of our attention on signing Nicolas Pepe.

That leaves us without a new CB (pretty bad granted). But it would completely redesign our right wing which has been a glaring weakness of ours for years (if not close to a decade). With the addition of Fernandes we'd also have two new sources of goals (Pepe and Fernandes) which should ease the pressure on Pogba and our strikers. Granted it's not ideal and the squad would still need major work but at least we'd (on paper at least) fix at least two issues in the squad. Our defense would be improved with AWB in the team at least and it gives us a season to assess Tuanzebe. We can then prioritise DM and CB next summer.
 

elnorte

Freaky fly day
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
5,063
That's what I'm thinking.
Had the same story been printed last Summer, fans on this forum would not have believed it, even though it would later turn out to be true.

At this stage, I have no idea what to believe. Woodward is trying to save money - I know that for a fact. So this would fit in with Woodward's planning.
What do you think are the reasons behind Woodward's, to use a polite term, frugal approach to transfer spending?
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
100 million net is about what i'd expect for a club without Champions League football?

You are lucky really that you can go in to next season realistically knowing that only two clubs will definitely finish above you.

The budget isn't your problem next season, it's having a manager that would struggle to get a job at any other Premier league club, and too many players that either don't want to be there, or don't seem to care about football enough?
Players now cost a lot more money. We have lost 2 midfield players in Fellaini and Herrera who we haven’t replaced. Plus we have to find a replacement for Ashley Young at RB and we also obviosly need a RW in our attack for ages. I also see we should find a CB to be the leader of the defense, but that could wait a year. So we need this year 4 players just to have a complete working team, and you can quickly see 100 million is not enough.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,444
Assuming we sell Pogba, what would Cafs consensus be if these are our 5 signings this summer?

1. Daniel James
2. Sean Longstaff
3. Wan Bissaka
4. Declan Rice
5. Harry Maguire
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
Assuming we sell Pogba, what would Cafs consensus be if these are our 5 signings this summer?

1. Daniel James
2. Sean Longstaff
3. Wan Bissaka
4. Declan Rice
5. Harry Maguire
We would be bereft of creativity and technical proficiency.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,543
Location
Polska
Assuming we sell Pogba, what would Cafs consensus be if these are our 5 signings this summer?

1. Daniel James
2. Sean Longstaff
3. Wan Bissaka
4. Declan Rice
5. Harry Maguire
Five players means it's a sign of serious rebuild. All of them have potential to improve themselves and the team but without solid source of goals these deals may be for nothing in terms of fight for CL spot.

We simply need attacking power to outscore opponents, it's basis for any attacking football.
 

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,012
The only hope I have is that outside of Real Madrid, there’s not been a lot of activity from other clubs.
 

lewwoo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
1,700
Location
Bridgwater
Surely the parasites are looking to sell in the not too distant future. If not then not sure what they are looking to achieve spending peanuts on a already failing team for the last few windows.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,072
Location
Dublin, Ireland
What do you think are the reasons behind Woodward's, to use a polite term, frugal approach to transfer spending?
There was a report that I glanced at earlier which claimed Woodward got a large pay rise last season for having the lowest net spend in years. Do I believe it? No, but he may be awarded bonuses on his P&L columns.

Or perhaps we’re tightening belts before a sale
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,340
There was a report that I glanced at earlier which claimed Woodward got a large pay rise last season for having the lowest net spend in years. Do I believe it? No, but he may be awarded bonuses on his P&L columns.

Or perhaps we’re tightening belts before a sale


Please let this be the case.
 

elnorte

Freaky fly day
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
5,063
There was a report that I glanced at earlier which claimed Woodward got a large pay rise last season for having the lowest net spend in years. Do I believe it? No, but he may be awarded bonuses on his P&L columns.

Or perhaps we’re tightening belts before a sale
Thanks. P&L theory sounds plausible although my understanding of this subject is limited.

@Coops73 Perhaps depends on who we're prospectively selling to?
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,340
Thanks. P&L theory sounds plausible although my understanding of this subject is limited.

@Coops73 Perhaps depends on who we're prospectively selling to?
True, out of the frying pan and into the fire and all that but right now I’d just be happy to see them go.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
Could happen, I’m just not getting those vibes right now.
I don't want to give you false hope but the reality is that you never have actual vibes, only a handful of peoples have an actual clue and unless they talk to someone, no one knows how advanced a transfer is.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,340
I don't want to give you false hope but the reality is that you never have actual vibes, only a handful of peoples have an actual clue and unless they talk to someone, no one knows how advanced a transfer is.
Yeah, I know, I’m obviously surmising.
 

Megadrive Man

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
367
Supports
Liverpool
Players now cost a lot more money. We have lost 2 midfield players in Fellaini and Herrera who we haven’t replaced. Plus we have to find a replacement for Ashley Young at RB and we also obviosly need a RW in our attack for ages. I also see we should find a CB to be the leader of the defense, but that could wait a year. So we need this year 4 players just to have a complete working team, and you can quickly see 100 million is not enough.
The reality is that you aren't going to be able to solve all these problems in one transfer window.

You are probably going to have to settle for 2-3 players this summer. That should still make you strong enough to either finish in the top four or win the Europa league?

If you sign three good young players and qualify for the Champions League, you will have had a good season.
If you don't qualify for the Champions league then your manager will be gone and you will probably get a much better manager.

Either way you will be in a much stronger position this time next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPRouve

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
The reality is that you aren't going to be able to solve all these problems in one transfer window.

You are probably going to have to settle for 2-3 players this summer. That should still make you strong enough to either finish in the top four or win the Europa league?

If you sign three good young players and qualify for the Champions League, you will have had a good season.
If you don't qualify for the Champions league then your manager will be gone and you will probably get a much better manager.

Either way you will be in a much stronger position this time next year.
I can’t believe a Liverpool supporter is more optimistic about where we will be next year than I am, maybe because I have seen our club make mistake after mistake and it makes me not enthusiastic about our prospects. If we only sign 2-3 players, it all depends who they are. I just don’t believe this experiment of buying relatively inexperienced young players is going to work at all. Many see the James signing as a low risk signing, but I see it as a high risk / low outlay signing, which in my view is not what’s needed at a massive club like ours.
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,077
Location
Nut Megging
The reality is that you aren't going to be able to solve all these problems in one transfer window.

You are probably going to have to settle for 2-3 players this summer. That should still make you strong enough to either finish in the top four or win the Europa league?

If you sign three good young players and qualify for the Champions League, you will have had a good season.
If you don't qualify for the Champions league then your manager will be gone and you will probably get a much better manager.

Either way you will be in a much stronger position this time next year.
Great post which I agree with most of - except the bit about getting a much better manager. Think most of them are gone now, especially if we don’t qualify for CL again.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,270
I laughed initially when reading this then thought, hold on we have renewed Smalling, Jones, Young and Mata contracts.....if we were rebuilding, wouldn't you have expected that these were the names that would potentially be going than staying? I suspect whilst it might be more than 100m, that would be on the basis of having to replace Pogba, Rom or DDG where we would be spending the money we got for them anyway.

Also might make sense why Ole was appointed as maybe another manager would want to clear the decks where Ole appears to rate some players a lot higher than most. I am genuinely worried as I thought they would be more activity than at present. Deals take time to get over the line but I'm not exactly inspired by who we are being realistically link with anyway....
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,077
Location
Nut Megging
Really starting to get the impression the club is regretting appointing Ole so early and are not going to back him in the market. It cannot be feasible, if reports are to be believed, that we can’t close a deal for a RB, who wants to be here, and not look at other targets at the same time. If that is the case then Ed needs to be relinquished of all matters related to football. But we’ve known that for a long time.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Yes, i'm pretty sure there are a lot of misconceptions in this thread of how it works.

From what i understand, in the annual accounts the 'transfer spend' is seen through the 'Player Amortisation' line below (£138.4m) for 2018:
The £138.4m will be made up of writing off (amortising) previous year's transfer fees over the length of the contracts. So it will include for example £20m of the £100m we spent on Pogba in 2016 (£100m/5 year contract).

In simple terms getting say Bale on loan for 'free' but on £600k a week, would cost us £30m in annual profit terms. Wan Bissaka for £50m on £100k a week might cost us £15m a year (£50m/5 + £5m wages). How we actually pay for the transfer fee (up front/installments) is a different thing.
@Leftback99 - you seem knowledgeable on the subject so can I ask.....the money we have spent post-SAF under Moyes, LvG and Jose....am I right in thinking that the majority, if not all, of these transfers will be amortised on the balance sheet in this way i.e. an annual deduction for each year of their contract?

I have been thinking about a theory that the Glazers went for bust during this period in the hope of buying our way out of trouble short term and paying it back over the next 4/5 season, during which there would be minimal investment. Wondered if it stacks up with what we are seeing on the balance sheet?
 

john moran

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
Messages
131
Really starting to get the impression the club is regretting appointing Ole so early and are not going to back him in the market. It cannot be feasible, if reports are to be believed, that we can’t close a deal for a RB, who wants to be here, and not look at other targets at the same time. If that is the case then Ed needs to be relinquished of all matters related to football. But we’ve known that for a long time.
What people need to realise is that Woodward is a puppet, a highly paid puppet but a puppet. His role is to keep the spotlight off the real culprits in this scenario , the Glaziers .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,391
Location
Birmingham
Our average net expenditure since Fergie retired is just over £100m. So I am not surprised.
The worst part is we are abysmal at shifting players.
 

LeftyBlaster

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
7,014
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
Our average net expenditure since Fergie retired is just over £100m. So I am not surprised.
The worst part is we are abysmal at shifting players.
The difference is we are in a far worse position now. 100m gets you nowhere in the market especially if we want to build a title contending team again. We must be the worst run “elite” clib. It’s no surprise players don’t want to come.
 

Magnus Eriksson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3
Feel so cynical so i dont think it doesnt matter what kind of players we sign. Even Messi would probably be shit in United atm. Need to sort out the football side of the club with new people and a DOF. They need to form a longterm strategy for what kind of football we want to play and appoint managers with that in mind and how we are supposed to achieve it in a certain timespan. Just dont think anything on the pitch will change until that happens.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,391
Location
Birmingham
The difference is we are in a far worse position now. 100m gets you nowhere in the market especially if we want to build a title contending team again. We must be the worst run “elite” clib. It’s no surprise players don’t want to come.
I agree that it isn't enough but from a financial pov, I can see why it is set at £100m. Pur revenues are expected to fall this season, we have problem selling players and there is no guarantee of CL football at the end of the season. There is also strong evidence our commercial revenue is beginning to plateau.
This club isn't as rich as people like to assume.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
@Leftback99 - you seem knowledgeable on the subject so can I ask.....the money we have spent post-SAF under Moyes, LvG and Jose....am I right in thinking that the majority, if not all, of these transfers will be amortised on the balance sheet in this way i.e. an annual deduction for each year of their contract?

I have been thinking about a theory that the Glazers went for bust during this period in the hope of buying our way out of trouble short term and paying it back over the next 4/5 season, during which there would be minimal investment. Wondered if it stacks up with what we are seeing on the balance sheet?
The amortization tells you nothing about the way an asset is paid, even if you pay everything upfront from an accounting standpoint the cost will be spread over the useful life of the asset.
 

Tel074

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
1,531
The eerie silence which is Eds transfer windows is getting less and less surprising ever year. 100 million to spend ? Lets hope its closer to 300 because unless we sign a RB a CB at least one CM and possibly another striker we have no hope of top 4 nevermind challenging the top 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
I agree that it isn't enough bit from a financial pov, i can see why it is set at £100m. Pur revenues are expected to fall this season, we have problem selling players and there is no guarantee of CL football at the end of the season. There is also strong evidence our commercial revenue is beginning to plateau.
This club isn't as rich as people like to assume.
The club is extremely rich but people don't really know what it means. Our team is probably overpaid by a good 100m, that money is yearly gone. People wonder why we aren't blowing smaller clubs away in the market, it's simply due to the fact that we already have financial commitment and these commitments aren't efficient at all. Just a reminder for people who think that the club isn't spending, the club's revenue in 2018 were 590m, the operating expenses were 562m, these are massive figures in football.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,391
Location
Birmingham
The club is extremely rich but people don't really know what it means. Our team is probably overpaid by a good 100m, that money is yearly gone. People wonder why we aren't blowing smaller clubs away in the market, it's simply due to the fact that we already have financial commitment and these commitments aren't efficient at all. Just a reminder for people who think that the club isn't spending, the club's revenue in 2018 were 590m, the operating expenses were 562m, these are massive figures in football.
Yes, it's the point I am trying to make. Almost all of our revenue is already committed. I have always said it, this club is going nowhere until we clear the decks. Our wage bill alone is almost £300m. We have tons of players with almost no book value. We are a mess.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,428
@Leftback99 - you seem knowledgeable on the subject so can I ask.....the money we have spent post-SAF under Moyes, LvG and Jose....am I right in thinking that the majority, if not all, of these transfers will be amortised on the balance sheet in this way i.e. an annual deduction for each year of their contract?

I have been thinking about a theory that the Glazers went for bust during this period in the hope of buying our way out of trouble short term and paying it back over the next 4/5 season, during which there would be minimal investment. Wondered if it stacks up with what we are seeing on the balance sheet?
Yes, from what I've read that's how it works.
This explains it better:
https://newtrendsinaccountingandfin...otball-clubs-use-accounting-and-amortization/
It's a different thing to how we actually 'pay' for the players though.

Other clubs finances eg. Liverpool have been boosted by sales. We can't afford £150m a year and hardly getting anything back every year.
 

LeftyBlaster

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
7,014
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
I agree that it isn't enough but from a financial pov, I can see why it is set at £100m. Pur revenues are expected to fall this season, we have problem selling players and there is no guarantee of CL football at the end of the season. There is also strong evidence our commercial revenue is beginning to plateau.
This club isn't as rich as people like to assume.
It’s sad because all these problems have come from shiteous decision making from the top. Giving transfer power to a moron accountant, failing to get a proper DOF, penny saving by tolerating mediocrity, signing players without a proper vision etc. they’ve brought this on themselves. In the end, this is a football club and our results determine our value. They’ve grasped this too late.