Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So he saw an incident which was red card worthy and didn't do anything?
Why do you create this alternative reality for yourself? I just don't see the point really.He flung his arm to shake Reid off as many players do - he didn't make contact with his elbow. Reid clearly feigned injury hoping to get Aguero in trouble. Well it worked and he is banned.
No excuse for you guys not to win the derby now
In regard to the tweets, apparently he also said (when further questioned), "To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL."
That's awfully close to bringing the game into disrepute. I hope some investigators jump on this asap, police to follow.
Don't fret. They're still a very good side even without Aguero. A lot of this forum rates Iheanacho ahead of Rashford so it's not as if they will have a donkey as back up.
I don't understand this POV. I guess it's just sentimental fan-speak.
That's silly. It wouldn't have been any sweeter. It would and will be sweet to beat them with or without Aguero. And as it was said they still have enough firewpower to hurt us even without him..
This, with Auguero playing.they might score more goals as well. Recently we lost the title and cl spot on GD.
They'll probably play with a false 9 seeing as the match is at OT. They have a massive amount of attacking players who could play just in front of our defense attempting to pull us out of position.
One of those two games are in the ELC which is disappointing. I would like them to lose him for 3 league games.
You're talking nonsense like usual. Please point out my 'anti-city' posts? Haha
Well played
I agree with this - either Sterling or Nolitto (probably the latter) could play this role - both of whom have been playing well lately (better than Aguero who hasn't actually been at his best)
I don't think Halsey means that. I would suggest it means
I like my football with a bit of sentiment actually, especially when it comes to a derby. Obviously the practical side of me is happy that our chances of conceding has decreased, but I personally love seeing United play the best at their best. Still, as others have mentioned, it's not by any means guaranteed now.
But that's when sentiment matters the least of all.
I want everything, and everything is to win the derby, play well, score goals, don't concede goals, beat them at their best. I want everything.
Then you're not thinking straight. I want us to win well but I want us to win fairly. If we play against a team who have a player who should be suspended, it's not a fair game, on us.
Okay that quote was a joke, it's the Jose one from the beginning of the season.
Barring the Wilshere incident, all of them should have been red cards.
Not only is he admitting not to have shown the red card, but also that he later perjured himself when brought to appeal.
Which still brings about the issue of being less than honest. If it isn't coming from the FA, it gives the consolation that the FA weren't (on this occasion) favouring any particular team. But the PGMOL doing so seems a blatant attempt to acquit themselves of error. Nobody could accuse the referee of a poor/wrong decision when he didn't see it (a lie as it turns out).
Yep, seems a rather shocking admission. Further enquiry should no doubt follow. The phrase "opening a can of worms" comes to mind.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wouldn't surprise me if this was the front 6
He looks like he is going to be a great player, some very good young strikers around at the moment.
