Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp | Depp wins on all 3 counts

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
She told so many lies about the Franco clip. She said he was their neighbour but actually that entire top floor was owned by Johnny & he would have known if Franco lived in his home. Lots of people from the ECB have said that Franco never lived there. She said in the past that it was a coincidence they got in the lift at the same time, that's also a lie as the reason she goes down in the lift & then gets back into it with him to go back up is because you can't 'buzz in' people there. You can only get in with a keycard & so she had to go down to deliberately let Franco in. Elaine asked about her interaction with Franco in the lift, obviously trying to give Amber a chance to explain away the cuddle, but Amber replies by saying Franco was shocked to see her bruised face, touched her face & asked her what happened. This is a lie too because we literally saw the fecking video & he never once faces her or touches her face. She's just a serial adulterer that seems to think everyone is blind.
Irrelevant if she cheated or not, the lies aren't though. Being caught in so many lies questions everything she says. If I was in the jury I wouldn't believe a single word coming from her nor any evidence produced by her personally, how can you? Anyone can get caught in a "lie", or recollecting something wrong once or twice but this is obviously intentional perjury.
 

ZupZup

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,406
Location
W3104
Thanks for the more in-depth info. I am familiar with her and the show Cats does Countdown but didn't know about the political stuff.
The reality is more to do with the fact she is very pro-Israel and has links to lots of individuals and organisations that lobby on Israel’s behalf. A lot of them in the guise of fighting antisemitism.

Many people on the left feel that puts her in the category of fairly right wing and conservative.
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Irrelevant if she cheated or not, the lies aren't though. Being caught in so many lies questions everything she says. If I was in the jury I wouldn't believe a single word coming from her nor any evidence produced by her personally, how can you? Anyone can get caught in a "lie", or recollecting something wrong once or twice but this is obviously intentional perjury.
This is all the more damaging because almost all of her entire case relies on her word and she has been caught in numerous lies already. She also seems to have had tendency of lying before the trial because Depp himself accuses her several times of lying. I really don't see how she wins this cause unless she pulls something magical out of the bag.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
This is all the more damaging because almost all of her entire case relies on her word and she has been caught in numerous lies already. She also seems to have had tendency of lying before the trial because Depp himself accuses her several times of lying. I really don't see how she wins this cause unless she pulls something magical out of the bag.
I don't believe she will lose this in court but in the public eye she has already lost, which I think was the whole point for Depp. I remember how I thought he was scum because I believed all the allegations but after seeing this trial I have made an 180 turn.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,375
I don't believe she will lose this in court but in the public eye she has already lost, which I think was the whole point for Depp. I remember how I thought he was scum because I believed all the allegations but after seeing this trial I have made an 180 turn.
No denying he is a heavy addict, but that was not any well kept secret anyhow, the guy seem to be very generous to the people in his life and a massively skilled actor. I liked most of his movies and hope he gets back to acting again. Shame he got dragged into the mud this hard. Guess drugs, love and personality disorders don't mix with marriage well.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
I don't believe she will lose this in court but in the public eye she has already lost, which I think was the whole point for Depp. I remember how I thought he was scum because I believed all the allegations but after seeing this trial I have made an 180 turn.
You don't believe she will lose this case?
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
I don't believe she will lose this in court but in the public eye she has already lost, which I think was the whole point for Depp. I remember how I thought he was scum because I believed all the allegations but after seeing this trial I have made an 180 turn.
I agree. I haven't followed the case closely but it seems like an act of revenge for Depp regardless of the outcome. She's been vilified in the court of popular opinion either way.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,664
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
She's an Oxford maths graduate who became famous for being the numbers expert on a numbers and words TV show called Countdown. She's also a diehard United fan and does some work with the club, like hosting the annual awards.

She's not a Tory. She was Labour voter but is of Jewish heritage and left the party as a result of the antisemitism controversy during Jeremy Corbyn's period as leader. A lot of Corbyn's political allies see her as a protagonist in undermining his leadership as she was an outspoken critic of him, a firm believer that he was antisemitic and that his political faction were a danger to British Jews. Obviously that is a contentious issue for the British socialist left.

She voted Lib Dem in that last election not for the Tories. The Lib Dems would be best understood as standing politically for the same principles as the EU. They are pro-Europe obviously, more socially progressive but neoliberal capitalists. Think of Emmanuel Macron as a European politician of similar persuasion.
She's gone a bit mad on the old anti-Semitism though. She recently claimed most of the criticism J.K. Rowling was getting for her views on Trans people was in fact because she spoke out against anti-Semitism and James Corbyn previously.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,375
You don't believe she will lose this case?
From what I read it's notoriously hard to win a defamation case, all of these character expos are just to sow some doubt, but the only hard evidence related to the main defamation question was that Depps representative sisclosed, that Depp sanctioned a smear the other way and was present when that was leaked. Not only might he lose, he might even have to pay the $100m. But probably he won back some level of dignity in the public eye. Perhaps they will settle also at the very end.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
She's gone a bit mad on the old anti-Semitism though. She recently claimed most of the criticism J.K. Rowling was getting for her views on Trans people was in fact because she spoke out against anti-Semitism and James Corbyn previously.
I don't disagree that she seems to have gotten pretty carried away with the antisemitism and some of her interpretations are definitely eccentric. The problem with calling her a Tory though is it implies that she's simply a cynical actor leveraging her Jewishness to advance their political cause. She isn't a Tory and I'm not convinced that she's committed to Blairism or 'centrism' to the extent to leverage her Jewishness in a politically cynical way to advance that cause either. I think that she probably believes what she's saying about Corbyn's faction, rightly or wrongly.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
I agree. I haven't followed the case closely but it seems like an act of revenge for Depp regardless of the outcome. She's been vilified in the court of popular opinion either way.
I don't know in what world clearing your name is vengeful. He never wanted it to come to this & tried to protect her from this so many times before reaching this point.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
Just saw a thread on Rachel rileys twitter where Depp is exposed.

The guys a complete peice of shit. Both are as bad as one another.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,250
1. Photo shopped pictures.
2. That she donated the money to charity.
3. That she didn't say on TV that she donated the money to charity.
4. Evidence picture of house damage, she used the picture twice for 2 events 6 months apart & claimed it was evidence from the event. At worst she lied about both, at best she lied about one because it can't have been from both events.
5. Lied about being against cocaine.
6. Lied about the first time she hit JD, she told us first time she hit him was the staircase incident but she had also said she hit him months earlier.
7. Lied about the event with police as shown by the bodycam footage.
8. Lied about JD threatening to break her friends wrist, all other witnesses such as Rocky etc have no memory of JD grabbing her & saying "do you know how many pounds of pressure it takes to break a human wrist?".
9. Lied about the contact she had with her friend at the campfire, Rocky said Amber was sharing a chair & cuddling the friend, Amber said they were sat next to each other & her friend just leaned a little bit on her arm.
10. Lied about not hitting Depp with the door & punching him, even though she was played the audio of her admitting it 15 seconds prior.
11. Lied about Dr Kipper not being her doctor.
12. Lied about leaking kitchen video to TMZ.
13. Lied about leaking divorce to TMZ.
14. Lied about not writing on the bathroom mirror with lipstick.
15. Lied about bed breaking incident.

Edit:
16. Lied about the dog pooping the bed, the dog wasn't able to reach the bed & the poop was the same size as the dog.
17. Lied about the dog having a chronic bowel illness from eating JD's weed. Dogs eat weed literally all the time & there's no such thing as chronic illness from it.
18. Lied about Franco being her neighbour. JD owned all the penthouses on that floor & I'm sure he'd know if Franco lived in his house.

They're the lies I can remember off the top of my head where it has been in her testimony. Obviously lots more if you go outside of that.
That should be plenty enough lies for Hollywood to blacklist her forever.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
From what I read it's notoriously hard to win a defamation case, all of these character expos are just to sow some doubt, but the only hard evidence related to the main defamation question was that Depps representative sisclosed, that Depp sanctioned a smear the other way and was present when that was leaked. Not only might he lose, he might even have to pay the $100m. But probably he won back some level of dignity in the public eye. Perhaps they will settle also at the very end.
I can guarantee you there's 0% chance of any of this happening. There's 0% chance she'll win her counter-claim, 0% chance she has proven $100m in damages & 0% chance they'll settle this close to the end. There's even a good chance her counter-claim won't be put before the jury as she has failed to provide any evidence that a reasonable jury could conclude defamation on Depp's part.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,375
I can guarantee you there's 0% chance of any of this happening. There's 0% chance she'll win her counter-claim, 0% chance she has proven $100m in damages & 0% chance they'll settle this close to the end. There's even a good chance her counter-claim won't be put before the jury as she has failed to provide any evidence that a reasonable jury could conclude defamation on Depp's part.
The judge just green lit her counterclaim I understood
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
Just saw a thread on Rachel rileys twitter where Depp is exposed.

The guys a complete peice of shit. Both are as bad as one another.
Hadn't seen it before but I'll check it out & edit this post as I go along.

1st mark against him is for defending Roman Polanski - This is a stupid point because it was before Roman was found to have raped those young girls. I've said good things about Sir Alex, if news came out he's a serial rapist am I somehow a bad person for having previously spoken highly of him?

2nd post in the thread is literally Depp talking about how cute it was when Weinstein put his daughter's coat on for her. Again, is Depp somehow now responsible for it later coming out that Weinstein forced himself on women?

3rd post is that he's friends with Manson, I don't even think this is worth addressing, again it's an attempt at guilty by association but only this time for association with a guy that hasn't been found guilty of anything! Manson has been accused but is defending himself & awaiting a trial but yet somehow he's already guilty and it's Depp's fault. Good effort.

4th post is claiming he groomed Winona Ryder. This post is probably the most pathetic so far as it claims Depp was 13 years older than her which is odd given he's 58 and she's 50. How did she catch up those 5 years?

5th post, he allegedly has a fling with a 24 year old. Oh no. I'm sure no guy here would stoop so low if a 24 year old model was interested in them & they were single.

6th post, he's homophobic for calling Amber Heard a lesbian camp counselor. Jeez, it's insensitive but I doubt it gives us a definitive insight into his feelings on homosexuals.

7th post is he allegedly used the N-word once. Jesus Christ, maybe he is a monster.

8th post is the same as the 7th.

9th post is that he threw a bottle at Ellen Barkin, well we can discount this one because she just testified that he didn't do that at all. Jesus christ I've just read ahead and there's so many posts & I'm losing the will to live but if I stop now I might miss a genuine thing to be disgusted over.

10th post is morbid texts quoting the monty python skit to Paul Bettany. I actually can't believe they've added that to this list. Well, maybe I can given how weak this list has been so far.

11th post is more of him speaking ill of Amber Heard.

12th post I feel like I'm misunderstanding? It says Depp makes racist jokes & then shows a Don Rickles quote of a racist joke. Unless Depp was secretly a ghost-writer for Don Rickles or something I'm missing?

13th post is about trashing a hotel room in 1994 and being arrested for an altercation with a guard in 1989.

At this point I read ahead because this is tiresome & there's nothing interesting. If the list makes him a complete piece of shit then you've got some high standards. I'd say flawed, like every other human. To each their own.
 
Last edited:

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
The judge just green lit her counterclaim I understood
She did not. They agreed on what the jury instructions would be & of course they have to make instructions for the possible event that the counter-claim reaches the jury but it hasn't yet. Amber hasn't rested her case & the motion to dismiss the counter-claim can't be made until Amber rests her case. Once Amber rests, they will make a motion to dismiss & it's honestly probably more likely than not to be granted & the claim never put in front of the jury as they failed to tie Depp to the Adam Waldman tweet & so the only way the jury could find in favour of Amber is by improper inference which would not actually be legal.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,375
She did not. They agreed on what the jury instructions would be & of course they have to make instructions for the possible event that the counter-claim reaches the jury but it hasn't yet. Amber hasn't rested her case & the motion to dismiss the counter-claim can't be made until Amber rests her case. Once Amber rests, they will make a motion to dismiss & it's honestly probably more likely than not to be granted & the claim never put in front of the jury as they failed to tie Depp to the Adam Waldman tweet & so the only way the jury could find in favour of Amber is by improper inference which would not actually be legal.
Thanks for the clarification, news on this trial are so biased.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Hadn't seen it before but I'll check it out & edit this post as I go along.

1st mark against him is for defending Roman Polanski - This is a stupid point because it was before Roman was found to have raped those young girls. I've said good things about Sir Alex, if news came out he's a serial rapist am I somehow a bad person for having previously spoken highly of him?

2nd post in the thread is literally Depp talking about how cute it was when Weinstein put his daughter's coat on for her. Again, is Depp somehow now responsible for it later coming out that Weinstein forced himself on women?

3rd post is that he's friends with Manson, I don't even think this is worth addressing, again it's an attempt at guilty by association but only this time for association with a guy that hasn't been found guilty of anything! Manson has been accused but is defending himself & awaiting a trial but yet somehow he's already guilty and it's Depp's fault. Good effort.

4th post is claiming he groomed Winona Ryder. This post is probably the most pathetic so far as it claims Depp was 13 years older than her which is odd given he's 58 and she's 50. How did she catch up those 5 years?

5th post, he allegedly has a fling with a 24 year old. Oh no. I'm sure no guy here would stoop so low if a 24 year old model was interested in them & they were single.

6th post, he's homophobic for calling Amber Heard a lesbian camp counselor. Jeez, it's insensitive but I doubt it gives us a definitive insight into his feelings on homosexuals.

7th post is he allegedly used the N-word once. Jesus Christ, maybe he is a monster.

8th post is the same as the 7th.

9th post is that he threw a bottle at Ellen Barkin, well we can discount this one because she just testified that he didn't do that at all. Jesus christ I've just read ahead and there's so many posts & I'm losing the will to live but if I stop now I might miss a genuine thing to be disgusted over.
:lol: :lol:
The lengths you go to to justify Deppos actions, not sure if it's alarming or just funny?!
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
:lol: :lol:
The lengths you go to to justify Deppos actions, not sure if it's alarming or just funny?!
It's important to do independent research. Then you don't get left with egg on your face looking like a moron that just blindly follows headlines.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
Thanks for the clarification, news on this trial are so biased.
Thanks. I try to do as much research as I can & feed it into this thread to help keep people informed but a lot of the time I'm just criticised by people that haven't done any research. For further clarification, they could still tie Depp to the Waldman tweets but the only way they can do that now is through Depp so they'd have to call him to the stand again on Monday & basically get him to admit that Waldman made those tweets on his behalf.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
It's important to do independent research. Then you don't get left with egg on your face looking like a moron that just blindly follows headlines.
:lol: :lol:

Or just look for things to justify Deppo being an absolute twonk you mean?!
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,375
Thanks. I try to do as much research as I can & feed it into this thread to help keep people informed but a lot of the time I'm just criticised by people that haven't done any research. For further clarification, they could still tie Depp to the Waldman tweets but the only way they can do that now is through Depp so they'd have to call him to the stand again on Monday & basically get him to admit that Waldman made those tweets on his behalf.
What was the deal with Waldman saying Depp was in on / behind the leaks?
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
What was the deal with Waldman saying Depp was in on / behind the leaks?
Not sure about leaks? The defamation counter-claim is about a Waldman tweet that Amber & her friends had set Depp up with regards to a specific incident where they were visited by 4 police officers. For some reason they're using that tweet to counter-sue Depp but Waldman said the tweets were his own opinion & they weren't able to show that he made them under instruction from Depp.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
Hadn't seen it before but I'll check it out & edit this post as I go along.

1st mark against him is for defending Roman Polanski - This is a stupid point because it was before Roman was found to have raped those young girls. I've said good things about Sir Alex, if news came out he's a serial rapist am I somehow a bad person for having previously spoken highly of him?

2nd post in the thread is literally Depp talking about how cute it was when Weinstein put his daughter's coat on for her. Again, is Depp somehow now responsible for it later coming out that Weinstein forced himself on women?

3rd post is that he's friends with Manson, I don't even think this is worth addressing, again it's an attempt at guilty by association but only this time for association with a guy that hasn't been found guilty of anything! Manson has been accused but is defending himself & awaiting a trial but yet somehow he's already guilty and it's Depp's fault. Good effort.

4th post is claiming he groomed Winona Ryder. This post is probably the most pathetic so far as it claims Depp was 13 years older than her which is odd given he's 58 and she's 50. How did she catch up those 5 years?

5th post, he allegedly has a fling with a 24 year old. Oh no. I'm sure no guy here would stoop so low if a 24 year old model was interested in them & they were single.

6th post, he's homophobic for calling Amber Heard a lesbian camp counselor. Jeez, it's insensitive but I doubt it gives us a definitive insight into his feelings on homosexuals.

7th post is he allegedly used the N-word once. Jesus Christ, maybe he is a monster.

8th post is the same as the 7th.

9th post is that he threw a bottle at Ellen Barkin, well we can discount this one because she just testified that he didn't do that at all. Jesus christ I've just read ahead and there's so many posts & I'm losing the will to live but if I stop now I might miss a genuine thing to be disgusted over.

10th post is morbid texts quoting the monty python skit to Paul Bettany. I actually can't believe they've added that to this list. Well, maybe I can given how weak this list has been so far.

11th post is more of him speaking ill of Amber Heard.

12th post I feel like I'm misunderstanding? It says Depp makes racist jokes & then shows a Don Rickles quote of a racist joke. Unless Depp was secretly a ghost-writer for Don Rickles or something I'm missing?

13th post is about trashing a hotel room in 1994 and being arrested for an altercation with a guard in 1989.

At this point I read ahead because this is tiresome & there's nothing interesting. If the list makes him a complete piece of shit then you've got some high standards. I'd say flawed, like every other human. To each their own.
I wasn't aware of the context so thank you for that
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,871
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
That should be plenty enough lies for Hollywood to blacklist her forever.
They're not going to blacklist her for lying. She's going to be blacklisted for trying to drag two of her biggest companies in Hollywood into it, including threatening sanctions against Disney for not sending a more substantial witness.
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Not sure about leaks? The defamation counter-claim is about a Waldman tweet that Amber & her friends had set Depp up with regards to a specific incident where they were visited by 4 police officers. For some reason they're using that tweet to counter-sue Depp but Waldman said the tweets were his own opinion & they weren't able to show that he made them under instruction from Depp.
Same officers that testified that they didn't recognize her as a victim of domestic violence?

They're not going to blacklist her for lying. She's going to be blacklisted for trying to drag two of her biggest companies in Hollywood into it, including threatening sanctions against Disney for not sending a more substantial witness.
Mainly this, if it happens. Ezra Miller has assaulted multiple people and he is still in DC and Harry Potter.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
Same officers that testified that they didn't recognize her as a victim of domestic violence?


Mainly this, if it happens. Ezra Miller has assaulted multiple people and he is still in DC and Harry Potter.
Yes. It was that incident with those officers that Adam Waldman's tweet was referencing.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Believe what you want. I'll present information, I couldn't care less what you do with it. Cya
:lol: :lol:

I shall do, thanks man, appreciate you allowing me that. Means a lot!
Also, you got some stuff wrong, guess your research isn't perfect either. :D
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
You don't believe she will lose this case?
I don't think so but she won't win the counterclaim either that's for sure.

I'm sure that the majority of those who believed in Heard's allegations have changed their mind after watching some of this trial. I am one of them. I don't think Depp could care less about the money, he just wants everyone to know what was really going on. He has already won imo.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,168
Location
Manchester
She's gone a bit mad on the old anti-Semitism though. She recently claimed most of the criticism J.K. Rowling was getting for her views on Trans people was in fact because she spoke out against anti-Semitism and James Corbyn previously.
She is unhinged imo.

I wouldn't be surprised if she had the same personality disorder as Heard!
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
No denying he is a heavy addict, but that was not any well kept secret anyhow, the guy seem to be very generous to the people in his life and a massively skilled actor. I liked most of his movies and hope he gets back to acting again. Shame he got dragged into the mud this hard. Guess drugs, love and personality disorders don't mix with marriage well.
Well he did leave his family for a psychopath and got all this shit that goes with it.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,871
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
So it appears that Amber Heard's bruise kit is actually captured in one of the photos she took of Depp while he's passed out.

The ice cream one she sent on to her friend.

It's a theatrical bruise kit for creating bruises, apparently, rather than a correction kit.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
So it appears that Amber Heard's bruise kit is actually captured in one of the photos she took of Depp while he's passed out.

The ice cream one she sent on to her friend.

It's a theatrical bruise kit for creating bruises, apparently, rather than a correction kit.
Hard to prove but it wouldn't surprise me.