Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Graham with a Freudian slip.
Amy Coney-Barrett | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Thread starter Ubik
- Start date
Graham with a Freudian slip.
are you watching? he folded
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
87 years, Christ on a bike. There should be an age limit for something as important as the senate.
The best people.That caught my attention too, but to be fair she has done very good during the hearings.
I’m following them through CSpan on youtube
And she named four of the freedoms and didnt remember the right to assembly
edit: not assembly, but protest
I’m following them through CSpan on youtube
And she named four of the freedoms and didnt remember the right to assembly
edit: not assembly, but protest
Last edited:
"Summer 2020, Amy. Just think of summer 2020"
She's been useless for years. She really should have stepped down years ago. Why she doesn't is telling.
Sen Corey Booker is good
He is Spartacus.
because he wants to free slaves?
Sen martha blackburn is evil
Yep.So, all hysteria aside, who else thinks she’s a proper MILF?
thread:
and an article:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
and an article:
https://newrepublic.com/article/159766/supreme-court-designed-kill-climate-policies
things are getting ugly
Na it's mainly conservative media trying to manufacture rage directed against Barrett, not really making much waves in a media cycle constantly dominated by Trump.
Wouldn't put it past her. And why did he bring it up?
Not really. Just wing win media stirring the pot. The entire three days of hearings went remarkably smoothly compared to Kavanaugh.
The media told Sen Kennedy about the boston professor calling her a white colonist for adopting two kids of color? Honest question.
And yes, it’s going smoothier than kavanaugh hearings but he harassed a former employee and “forgot” to tell that he was under investigation for misconduct
You think she might be a white colonist for adopting two black kids?
Couple more years and she will be old enough for a run at the presidency
The Blaze as a reputable news source? These are the twats that gave Tomi fecking Lahren her springboard into the public consciousness. That alone puts them into the same batshit stratosphere as Newsmax & WND.
The blaze is just showing what a senator told ACB
That’s not a source
Of course it’s a source, it is showing news, somewhat breaking news in this case.
Okay, for the semantically-focused among us, The Blaze is a dubious news platform due to the loons they have had on their site.
Ok. Now i know that and I won’t argue it, i’m sure you know better
Anyway, in this case, they are just showing what a senator told ACB
So, the source is not the Blaze, but sen Kennedy
Again, for the semantically-focused among us, The Blaze is a news platform or a media source. My apologies for apparently violating a canon of the news industry.
Was what the senator asked ACB not newsworthy?
Mate, my english is not that good. But i think i understand your point. The Blaze is trying to make a big deal out of nothing. Is it that?
If that’s the case, my apologies.
Curious. No worries, brother.
Cheers
The person she is interviewing will be appointed for life. The judge they’re replacing was a sitting judge till her death at the age of 87.
America definitely needs term limits for various government positions.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
so, how long till the final vote?
Something needs to be done but definitely no complete age ban. Some of the old folks serve as good reminders as well and can see history "repeating" itself.
She doesn’t know what ‘climate change’ means, and she’ll be appointed for life. Cool.
One thing that amazes me is the importance that the judges have in the USA. In Argentina most people have no idea who are the SC judges.
But i just read an article in the NYT about ACB, were it says that in 2003
the SC ruled out state sodomy laws!!!
Of course, if you have such shit state laws, the SC decisions are paramount.
So the problem are not the SCOTUS, but the stupid state legislators.
But i just read an article in the NYT about ACB, were it says that in 2003
the SC ruled out state sodomy laws!!! Of course, if you have such shit state laws, the SC decisions are paramount.
So the problem are not the SCOTUS, but the stupid state legislators.
The real horror of the Trump administration is the hundreds of lower court judges that his admin has rammed through in copious numbers. Their vileness will inhabit this country for at least one full generation, of not more. These judges will negatively affect potentially many people more quickly than SCOTUS will.One thing that amazes me is the importance that the judges have in the USA. In Argentina most people have no idea who are the SC judges.
But i just read an article in the NYT about ACB, were it says that in 2003
Of course, if you have such shit state laws, the SC decisions are paramount.
So the problem are not the SCOTUS, but the stupid state legislators.
one senator today IIRC said that Trump appointed over 100 lower court judges, non of them were black and only 20 percent weren't white -i guess latinos and asians-.
But seriously, judges work with the laws that the legislature provides, and for what i see some state legislatures have very shit laws
same law can be interpreted very differently. for example, 5 supreme court judges thought that a state cannot ban guns and 4 thought it can. 5 thought that votes should not be re-counted in florida and 4 thought they should, and so whoever was ahead at the point (George Bush) won.
all 5 were appointed by republicans. it is not a coincidence.
Those are examples of comstitutional law, and of course, you are right
but when in 2003 you still had a state that punish sodomy, and enforces it, the problem is greater than you think and the judicial labor becomes too important
edit. On second thought i don’t know if the bush v gore ruling was about constitutional law