DJ Jeff
Not so Jazzy
If he has done these things, turf him out. Cancel his contract.
Hmm, I don't think that is whataboutery? I'm commenting on the fact that she was urging people to vote for Boris Johnson, which is weird considering she didn't want people to vote for Corbyn because of his 'racism'?Maybe whataboutery isn't an argument?
Ha! Enjoy. Put on some nice music. Watch a film. Don’t waste any more time splitting hairs with online pedants like me!Ok. Thanks for responding mate. I'd be lying if i said I truly understood what you're getting at though, but I'm not keen to labour the point any more than i have. Feeling like I've been labelled some kind of racist and not being able to undesrtand whyi s clearly (who knew?) my redcafe Kryptonite) .On an unrelated note I took a couple of lorezepam I found whilst moving rooms, about 2 hours ago. Which has made this conversation, erm, interesting, to say the least
To stop Niccolo having a meltdown, read the bolded again. They didn't say it affects how much worth they ascribe to the Greenwood matter.
Edit: You lot have the poor fecker taking Benzos (a shit one though) tragic
Apologies are in order, NicolaSacco.It was a poor comparison, and made little sense, I'd agree. I think i'm just generally supportive of her Greenwood comments, less so of her Corbyn/antisemitism ones. Not entirely sure that justified me giving myself the world's most unnecessary panic-attack, though!
True enough. It's a bit different nowadays with Twitter though. Celebs will be acutely aware of the platform they have and gleefully use it to manipulate discourse one way or another. Pre social media it'd be embarrassing for a celebrity to be known as a rent-a-quote on topics that are of absolutely no relevance to their status and/or position. Now they have a direct feed to the masses and are actually listened to and talked about, beyond readers of the rags/celeb mags.That's celebrity for you. The society of the spectacle. When people agree they retweet, when they disagree they think celebrities should shut up.
Yes, it's definitely more immediate and prone to whimsy as a result of tech alright.True enough. It's a bit different nowadays with Twitter though. Celebs will be acutely aware of the platform they have and gleefully use it to manipulate discourse one way or another. Pre social media it'd be embarrassing for a celebrity to be known as a rent-a-quote on topics that are of absolutely no relevance to their status and/or position. Now they have a direct feed to the masses and are actually listened to and talked about, beyond readers of the rags/celeb mags.
Big mistake that, nothing good ever comes of itApologies are in order, NicolaSacco.
I read your post about you needing a lie down and then read @Pogue Mahone's post, and posted as I only wanted to elaborate on why others were piling on and to tell you to take it easy. However, I don't think anyone called you racist or anything. But I apologize for "trusting but not verifying".
God damn it, I had decided not to engage with anyone on the Internet and now look what I did. I will take my own advice and stop posting in this thread.
These allegations are pretty horrible.
He has been removed from the national team and police in Manchester have been given evidence by the police in Sao Paolo.
UOL wrote that they have seen messages on her WhatsApp from Antony where he is apologising for kicking and punching her.
I agree, this line of inquiry should pretty much clear things up either way given the claims of corroborative evidence presented. If there was indeed any physical assault that required specific attention from doctors with records, and the incident has supporting corroborating evidence in terms of records, photos, lack of alibis, and the couple's communication history, it would be difficult to argue against Antony's culpability. I hope we find out the truth.There is a claim that she was treated by club doctors at United. Her lawyers are in contact with the club. We are going to find out very soon whats what
Correct but I’m not sure how you can accurately assess that , it’s basically the job of a social worker and we all know how that can go.Exactly, that is why I said looking at the player mental state should be as important as their footballing ability. Now with this allegations, it will affect his performance and now ETH will have another distraction to deal with
Ha, ha, netflix was my first call, that's literally what i just did!Ha! Enjoy. Put on some nice music. Watch a film. Don’t waste any more time splitting hairs with online pedants like me!
All good. Just going to have a 14 hour power nap and i'll be right as rain! Cheers guysApologies are in order, NicolaSacco.
I read your post about you needing a lie down and then read @Pogue Mahone's post, and posted as I only wanted to elaborate on why others were piling on and to tell you to take it easy. However, I don't think anyone called you racist or anything. But I apologize for "trusting but not verifying".
God damn it, I had decided not to engage with anyone on the Internet and now look what I did. I will take my own advice and stop posting in this thread.
No the issue is that she is using her platform to single out people who have NOT been proven guilty. Sorry if he’s found guilty by all means she along with everyone else has a right to vilify him but otherwise it’s abhorrent. If he’s innocent then she’s used her platform to start a witch hunt, excuse me for thinking that the rule of law and the right to a day in court was a given in the UK. For someone like her of all people to take the moral high ground on anything is laughable. She allegedly left her husband for her dance partner. She can give me a break with her virtue signalling.But it's not a separate issue, that's what's so weird. It's like some odd incel outpouring in this thread. She's become a central character because of the outrage at her.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's a bit different as he was technically arrested and charged today so the Dodgers had to react by putting him on adminstrative leave. I imagine it being his second offence twisted their arm. He's also an impending free agent so I'm sure they're happy he won't be their problem for much longer.It shouldn't even be a choice whether this club (or any club) can continue to use a player being accused of something like this. It should be coming down from the governing body itself.
In today's Los Angeles Times, Julio Urias (a very popular pitcher for the Dodgers) has just been accused of a second domestic abuse incident. The MLB commission suspended him. MLB also suspended Trevor Bauer, another Dodgers pitcher, for 194 games. There's precedent. Even if it's a season-killer.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/dodg...julio-urias-domestic-violence-case-commentary
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bit confused sorry, but has he been charged officially?https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...anchester-united-have-not-learned-any-lessons
Antony case shows Manchester United have not learned any lessons
Barney Ronay
Over the weekend United’s media relations arm was busy with other matters, making it known, publicly and in no uncertain terms, that recent criticism of its middle management had upset the hierarchy; that the club feels such criticism is undeserved, that things are turning around now, that it is a tightly run ship these days. A fair point, perhaps. But the timing has turned out to be deeply unfortunate. Since then a 3-1 defeat at Arsenal has been followed by a disastrous act of public laundry‑wringing by Jadon Sancho. And now we have this.
The allegations against Antony have been lurking in plain sight for three months now. On Monday afternoon they became unignorable – no matter how hard the club might try – with the publication of further deeply depressing claims in Brazil.
Yes, complaining about unfair treatment from the press while addressing that subject is perfectly reasonable and not at all going to come across as whiny, self indulgent and misguided. Silence and accusations of bias is exactly how you will get the press on your side.https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...anchester-united-have-not-learned-any-lessons
Antony case shows Manchester United have not learned any lessons
Barney Ronay
Over the weekend United’s media relations arm was busy with other matters, making it known, publicly and in no uncertain terms, that recent criticism of its middle management had upset the hierarchy; that the club feels such criticism is undeserved, that things are turning around now, that it is a tightly run ship these days. A fair point, perhaps. But the timing has turned out to be deeply unfortunate. Since then a 3-1 defeat at Arsenal has been followed by a disastrous act of public laundry‑wringing by Jadon Sancho. And now we have this.
The allegations against Antony have been lurking in plain sight for three months now. On Monday afternoon they became unignorable – no matter how hard the club might try – with the publication of further deeply depressing claims in Brazil.
Exactly this. Why is it so hard for people to understand? As soon as he’s charged he gets suspended.Bit confused sorry, but has he been charged officially?
If not, why would United drop him? Otherwise a lot of people can make accusations against people and clubs will have set a precedent to drop players each time till it gets proven wrong. If/once he gets charged he should 100% be suspended or whatever by the club, but till then I don't see why to be honest
Haunt us how? You didn't actually want us to keep playing Greenwood after the allegations were actually made did you?This is where the precedent we set with Greenwood comes back to haunt us.
Short term and in footballing terms we're taking losses, longer term I'm reasonably confident the club as an institution will benefit from being forced to adopt relevant policies and be more mindful of those issues.This is where the precedent we set with Greenwood comes back to haunt us.
Anything for publicity, she’ll be forgotten once she leaves Countdown.Quelle surprise
“Should Antony be banned from playing football because there is an allegation against him that will now be tested by the Crown Prosecution Service? Not on the face of it. The presumption of innocence exists for good reason. Is this a non-negotiable principle for all employees? Should it make any difference whether an individual is employed by entities that still claim at heart to be community sports clubs? Teachers and lawyers, among many others, are held to higher standards of behaviour than simply not being convicted of a crime.https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...anchester-united-have-not-learned-any-lessons
Antony case shows Manchester United have not learned any lessons
Barney Ronay
Over the weekend United’s media relations arm was busy with other matters, making it known, publicly and in no uncertain terms, that recent criticism of its middle management had upset the hierarchy; that the club feels such criticism is undeserved, that things are turning around now, that it is a tightly run ship these days. A fair point, perhaps. But the timing has turned out to be deeply unfortunate. Since then a 3-1 defeat at Arsenal has been followed by a disastrous act of public laundry‑wringing by Jadon Sancho. And now we have this.
The allegations against Antony have been lurking in plain sight for three months now. On Monday afternoon they became unignorable – no matter how hard the club might try – with the publication of further deeply depressing claims in Brazil.
Looks like United pulled a SanchoYes, complaining about unfair treatment from the press while addressing that subject is perfectly reasonable and not at all going to come across as whiny, self indulgent and misguided. Silence and accusations of bias is exactly how you will get the press on your side.
Maybe they use the same PR firmLooks like United pulled a Sancho
Because, I guess, a lot of people (particularly men) just want to enjoy their football, and not worry about the disgusting things the people they cheer on may have allegedly done to others (particularly women). Out of sight, out of mind.Why is she triggering such rage on you lot?
Not until charged but until the final verdict by a judge in court?Should be allowed to play until proven guilty.
If he gets charged he definitely should be suspended.Should be allowed to play until proven guilty.
Well said.Short term and in footballing terms we're taking losses, longer term I'm reasonably confident the club as an institution will benefit from being forced to adopt relevant policies and be more mindful of those issues.
Or maybe because she is trying somebody in the public arena with minimal information,Because, I guess, a lot of people (particularly men) just want to enjoy their football, and not worry about the disgusting things the people they cheer on may have allegedly done to others (particularly women). Out of sight, out of mind.
It's gross.
If this reaches court, I'd expect the player to be given time to take care of his defense.Should be allowed to play until proven guilty.
Absolutely. I would hope these can be used as learning experiences to institute better policies and better vetting of players.Short term and in footballing terms we're taking losses, longer term I'm reasonably confident the club as an institution will benefit from being forced to adopt relevant policies and be more mindful of those issues.
It's an allegation, isn't it? How about we refrain from judgement either way before getting our knickers in a twist? Due process means absolutely zip in the age of social media. Now that's depressing.Too much victim blaming again.
Our club and once proud support becomes just a little bit more toxic. How depressing.
I think if he gets arrested and charged then he should get suspended. Then the trial should decide what happens after.After the Greenwood fiasco club have no choice but stick to same moral standards.
When all the time the standard should be unless charged or legally punished club won't do anything else.
The question I have relative to what you have mentioned is why on earth arent we already vetting players and/or have better policies in place. Im assuming of course we dont which isnt the greatest approach I know.Absolutely. I would hope these can be used as learning experiences to institute better policies and better vetting of players.
Sadly, I suspect this won't be the case.
Just what vetting do you think can be undertaken? in order to get a work permit the club would be aware of any criminal proceedings or convictions, and if you think they don't do a background check beyond this I don't know what to say...Absolutely. I would hope these can be used as learning experiences to institute better policies and better vetting of players.
Sadly, I suspect this won't be the case.
Should be allowed to play until proven guilty.