Board vs Jose

SwansonsTache

incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
15,563
Location
Norway
Our starting CB pair today cost less combined than Maguire would have cost, so the board\Woody was right in denying Mou a new CB.

Going public is just idiotic though. A DOF would have kept his mouth shut and instead signed a player or two for positions where we are actually lacking, like RW and RB\LB.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
The difference between us and City is that Pep has outmanaged Jose in terms of tactics and player management. Pep won the league last year and it had feck all to do with his transfers and everything to do with coaching his players properly and creating the appropriate environment for them to thrive and be successful.
There's a lot more differences between us and City than this simplistic garbage.

They have outspent every side in the world including PSG by a ridiculous margin for a decade. They had been preparing for Guardiola for 3 years. They have outspent us in the market considerably since Guardiola and Mourinho arrived. They had a far better squad to work with, hence why he took the job.

I'm not saying Mourinho hasn't been better but to say it's "feck all" to do with spending when they're literally a state funded club, when they've literally spent more than anyone else in that time is laughable. You're terrible at making a coherent point - There's so much more to what's gone in the last two years than uh, Pep good, Jose bad. Get a grip.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
He inherited at least 6 Fergie era players who had won the league. What a terrible predicament for a new manager to be in.
He inherited four starters from that side - De Gea who is great, and Rooney/Carrick who are finished. Of the other players Jones and Smalling have the same issues they've always had with either injuries and inconsistency. Valencia has improved under Mourinho and found a new role after looking horrendous at RW for years, including that Ferguson season. Same too with Ashley Young. Improved by Mourinho.

Such a great predicament. Aguero, Silva, Kompany and De Bruyne don't hold a candle to such quality.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
There's a lot more differences between us and City than this simplistic garbage.

They have outspent every side in the world including PSG by a ridiculous margin for a decade. They had been preparing for Guardiola for 3 years. They have outspent us in the market considerably since Guardiola and Mourinho arrived. They had a far better squad to work with, hence why he took the job.

I'm not saying Mourinho hasn't been better but to say it's "feck all" to do with spending when they're literally a state funded club, when they've literally spent more than anyone else in that time is laughable. You're terrible at making a coherent point - There's so much more to what's gone in the last two years than uh, Pep good, Jose bad. Get a grip.
What an orgy of nonsense.

Jose has had a ridiculous amount of money to work with over the past couple of years and has not produced a league or even a CL semi. No one wanted him here more than I did, but at the end of the day after two years we deserve a hell of a lot more than the incremental, one step forward two steps back, park the bus style he has produced while breaking the bank each summer.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
He inherited four starters from that side - De Gea who is great, and Rooney/Carrick who are finished. Of the other players Jones and Smalling have the same issues they've always had with either injuries and inconsistency. Valencia has improved under Mourinho and found a new role after looking horrendous at RW for years, including that Ferguson season. Same too with Ashley Young. Improved by Mourinho.

Such a great predicament. Aguero, Silva, Kompany and De Bruyne don't hold a candle to such quality.
All league winners under Fergie. The common denominator being that we once had a manager who could take seemingly just "good" players and coach them to punch well above their collective weight.
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
The difference between us and City is that Pep has outmanaged Jose in terms of tactics and player management. Pep won the league last year and it had feck all to do with his transfers and everything to do with coaching his players properly and creating the appropriate environment for them to thrive and be successful.
So how come he finished fourth in his first season then, and had to sign about twenty players and spend about £1/2Billion?

Is that just ignored?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
So how come he finished fourth in his first season then, and had to sign about twenty players and spend about £1/2Billion?

Is that just ignored?
Its quickly forgotten when you play attractive football and win the league the following year. If he didn't do one (or both) then you can bet there would be some serious question asked.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
What an orgy of nonsense.

Jose has had a ridiculous amount of money to work with over the past couple of years and has not produced a league or even a CL semi. No one wanted him here more than I did, but at the end of the day after two years we deserve a hell of a lot more than the incremental, one step forward two steps back, park the bus style he has produced while breaking the bank each summer.
Jose's ridiculous amount of money seen him finish ahead of every side he outspent. If spending is so important than you then you should be more empathetic than most to finish 2nd. Our position to City last season is almost exactly in line with how the two clubs have spent in that time - In fact the points total is closer than the spending. They gave Guardiola everything he needed and more to get what they want. A nation state running a propaganda operation will do that.

There have been no two steps back - What are you talking about? We've improved unquestionably from where we were. The style could be better I agree but 81 points is not a bad tally, about 5/6 away from the PL winning average. It's a long way from Moyes/Van Gaal were we never even came within close to that.
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
Its quickly forgotten when you play attractive football and win the league the following year. If he didn't do one (or both) then you can bet there would be some serious question asked.
No, I was responding to your assertion that his success had feck all to do with his twenty transfers and £1/2Billion spend.

It quite clearly is. If he doesn’t get the players that suit him he isn’t successful. And he binned off a few after only one season.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
No, I was responding to your assertion that his success wasn’t about signing players.

It quite clearly is. If he doesn’t get the players that suit him he isn’t successful. And he binned off a few after only one season.
It wasn't last summer. Do you think he won the league because he signed the likes of Danilo and Mendy ? Of course not. He won it because he got his players to perform as he wanted them to, which requires a degree of high quality coaching.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
All league winners under Fergie. The common denominator being that we once had a manager who could take seemingly just "good" players and coach them to punch well above their collective weight.
They were f*cking squad players or were aging. The success of that squad had either little to do with them or else they were seriously depleted. Are you just f*cking trolling me or do you seriously believe Mourinho just didn't do enough with Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick?

This is garbage.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
Really? Where?

Bare in mind we're talking starting 11s as that's what Mata, Lingard and Darmian are, not squad players.
Have a look at the CL finalists and semi finalists over the past couple of years. Do you think Liverpool were stacked with 11 world beaters ? What about Monaco the year before ?
 

endless_wheelies

feeling dizzy
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,224
Have a look at the CL finalists and semi finalists over the past couple of years. Do you think Liverpool were stacked with 11 world beaters ? What about Monaco the year before ?
Liverpool and Monaco are not the benchmark.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
Really? Where?

Bare in mind we're talking starting 11s as that's what Mata, Lingard and Darmian are, not squad players.
Darmian and Mata aren't starters. Don't give Raoul ammunition to make a point when he's absolutely embarrassed himself.
 

SwansonsTache

incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
15,563
Location
Norway
Really? Where?

Bare in mind we're talking starting 11s as that's what Mata, Lingard and Darmian are, not squad players.
Cuadradao, Emre Can, Khedira, Mandzukic for Juve isn't anything special. For City their CB's are not very good, but are covered by Pep's system. Look at the state of Otamendi at the WC for example.

And Darmian is not a starter for us.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
They were f*cking squad players or were aging. The success of that squad had either little to do with them or else they were seriously depleted. Are you just f*cking trolling me or do you seriously believe Mourinho just didn't do enough with Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick?

This is garbage.
Yes he hasn't done enough with the resources he has been given here. That's the entire point. Let me know when he wins a league or CL and then we can have chat about how awesome he is.
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
All league winners under Fergie. The common denominator being that we once had a manager who could take seemingly just "good" players and coach them to punch well above their collective weight.
No, we had a manager who could pad out a team of established World Class players with ‘good players’. It took Fergie an awful long time to be successful, and he was then able to systematically build on that success.

The ‘good players’ were the supporting cast, not the players who were responsible for the success.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
Liverpool and Monaco are not the benchmark.
They are the sides who have had success in the CL over the past couple of years. At least they have done far better than we have so let us all pause to pay homage to the world class statuses of the likes of Bakayoko, Jordan Henderson, Llalana, Milner et al.
 

Thisistheone

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
7,904
He inherited at least 6 Fergie era players who had won the league. What a terrible predicament for a new manager to be in.
Thing is, those 5 or 6 were the weakest links from that Fergie team at the time, bar a massively improved De Gea.

Jones, Smalling, Young, Valencia (and an almost retired Carrick.)

It's not like Jose inherited Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand, Evra, Herdandez & RvP.

That's what happened when he won the league at Chelsea last time out, he had: Cech, Ivanovic, Terry, Azpili, Fabregas, Hazard, Drogba, Costa.

Jose proabably won't win the league until he matches or outspends City. That's Jose. That is the man Woodward picked and extended his contract in January.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
Yes he hasn't done enough with the resources he has been given here. That's the entire point. Let me know when he wins a league or CL and then we can have chat about how awesome he is.
You're terrible at this.

You made a point and are now deflecting. You specifically alluded to the group of David De Gea, Phil Jones, Chris Smalling, Antonio Valencia, Ashley Young, Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick as to reasons why Mourinho should be winning league titles from 2017-2018. Do you stand by this absolute garbage or do I have to go back and use the quote?

You've had a shocker mate. Must be taking the United win hard. Go and lie down.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
Thing is, those 5 or 6 were the weakest links from that Fergie team at the time, bar a massively improved De Gea.

Jones, Smalling, Young, Valencia (and an almost retired Carrick.)

It's not like Jose inherited Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand, Evra, Herdandez & RvP.

That's what happened when he won the league at Chelsea last time out, he had: Cech, Ivanovic, Terry, Azpili, Fabregas, Hazard, Drogba, Costa.

Jose won't win the league until he matches or outspends City. That's Jose. That is the man Woodward picked and extended his contract in January.
You don't think the likes of Terry and Drogba weren't ageing during Jose's 2nd stint at the bridge ?
 

Thisistheone

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
7,904
You don't think the likes of Terry and Drogba weren't ageing during Jose's 2nd stint at the bridge ?
Yes but they were world class players in their prime. Not a Smalling or Jones. He had far more to work with, plus there was no Pep, so the bar has been risen
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
You're terrible at this.

You made a point and are now deflecting. You specifically alluded to the group of David De Gea, Phil Jones, Chris Smalling, Antonio Valencia, Ashley Young, Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick as to reasons why Mourinho should be winning league titles from 2017-2018. Do you stand by this absolute garbage or do I have to go back and use the quote?

You've had a shocker mate. Must be taking the United win hard. Go and lie down.
I don't even know what you're arguing about (nor probably do you). The overarching point I've made is that Mourinho has underachieved and that we should expect more of him based on the amount of money he has spent on players who are barely making a difference for us. That's a perfectly normal position to take based on past results and the style of football he has served up.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
Yes but they were world class players. Not a Smalling or Jones. He had far more to work with, plus there was no Pep, so the bar has been risen
They were a number of years ago but certainly not during Jose's 2nd stint - they were both well into their 30s at that point and no different than the likes of Carrick and Rooney in terms of productivity in recent years. The likes of Costa and Hazard were the primary water carriers.
 

endless_wheelies

feeling dizzy
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,224
Darmian and Mata aren't starters. Don't give Raoul ammunition to make a point when he's absolutely embarrassed himself.
Cuadradao, Emre Can, Khedira, Mandzukic for Juve isn't anything special. For City their CB's are not very good, but are covered by Pep's system. Look at the state of Otamendi at the WC for example.

And Darmian is not a starter for us.
@Irish Jet Actually Darmian was an attempted trap, because the starter is Valencia, and Lingard/Mata were the two Raoul himself identified on the previous page.

@SwansonsTache Those players are still a heck of a lot better than Lingard et al. Same with Kompany, Otamendi, Stones and Laporte; easy arguments for all four to be playing alongside Bailly.

They are the sides who have had success in the CL over the past couple of years. At least they have done far better than we have so let us all pause to pay homage to the world class statuses of the likes of Bakayoko, Jordan Henderson, Llalana, Milner et al.
Well not really success because they registered about one impressive win then got knocked out. And do you want to finish 4th in the PL or apply for Ligue 1?
 
Last edited:

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
I don't even know what you're arguing about (nor probably do you). The overarching point I've made is that Mourinho has underachieved and that we should expect more of him based on the amount of money he has spent on players who are barely making a difference for us. That's a perfectly normal position to take based on past results and the style of football he has served up.
You're overarching point is terrible.

You continually highlight our spending and say we should expect more, yet if spending is everything then we should expect exactly what we are getting. One side has spent considerably more (had, Liverpool have overtaken us) and they're they're doing considerably better. We're doing better than every other side in the league. Players barely making a difference? Four of our best fiver players are Mourinho signings. Bailly is our best CB, Matic and Pogba our best midfielders and Lukaku our best striker. Zlatan was our best striker until his injury. To say they've "barely made a difference" to the shite being served up before - A finished Rooney and Schweingsteiger - Is laughable and just highlights your ridiculous agenda.

The reason you don't know what I'm talking about is because I don't think Mourinho is without serious flaws and am not caught arguing a case for the sake of picking sides. The team should have more cohesion, the playing style should be better, some money could have been better invested - But your outright dismissal of everything he's done and the ridiculous distortions of reality in which to do so suggest you're well beyond reason.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
How many goals did Drogba contribute during his recent year at Chelsea ?
Drogba was well past his best when he returned to Chelsea. Didn't offer much and they'd have probably been fine without him provided they had another backup striker in his place.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Our starting CB pair today cost less combined than Maguire would have cost, so the board\Woody was right in denying Mou a new CB.

Going public is just idiotic though. A DOF would have kept his mouth shut and instead signed a player or two for positions where we are actually lacking, like RW and RB\LB.
As I was saying earlier - if they don't trust his transfer decisions then there's little reason as to why he should still be at the club. It'd be different if we didn't have the funds available - the suggestion is that we did, and Mourinho's preferences were denied. That's a fairly serious undermining of the manager and suggests they're not happy with him. And if that's the case, why are they persisting with him?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,349
Location
Hollywood CA
Drogba was well past his best when he returned to Chelsea. Didn't offer much and they'd have probably been fine without him provided they had another backup striker in his place.
That's the entire point. He was like 35 or 36 when he came back and can hardly be looked at as any more productive than Fergie's holdovers like Rooney and Carrick when our recent managers took over.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,054
@Raoul
Jose has quite blatantly improved the squad with his signings considering Out of our expected first eleven
  • Bailly
  • Lindelof
  • Fred
  • Matic
  • Pogba
  • Alexis
  • Lukaku
Will all be expected to start the majority of matches.
That only leaves one dud in Mkhy, a great signing in Ibra who was a stop gap, a new youngster Dalot who will be expected to get minutes, and a third goalkeeper who won't be mainstays in the side this season.
The evidence is clearly there that Mourinho has improved the squad since he came in, unless you think we should fetch back the likes of Schneiderlin, Memphis, BFS etc?
We will get there with Mourinho if we are patient and are willing to let him improve the team.
Thankfully the Old Trafford faithful seem to understand this given they were chanting his name tonight, even if you don't.