Gary_Walsh_Nou_Camp_Hell
Full Member
Surely not being able to conclude deals is an issue?Don't think there is any issue, just that we are finding it hard to conclude the deals
Mou deserves to go mental if he doesn't get some decent additions
Surely not being able to conclude deals is an issue?Don't think there is any issue, just that we are finding it hard to conclude the deals
It was more of a Lindelof vs Michael Keane.He has brought two fecking CBs for 30-40 milion pounds each. Who’s fault is that they are not starting? By all accounts Jose chooses his transfer targets. He chose Lindelöf instead of Maguire just a year ago. How is he not backed?
I'm sure he will be found out in his next job. I hope it isn't at Old Trafford.Zidane is available and if Jose does not stop his polluting attitude, i’ll be more than happy to see him go. What is the benefit in having a go at Pogba like that in public?
Exactly, wasn't like it was out of the blue was it.Guessing he's on about Faria but he seems to have left on good terms to go into management.
Any transfer is, in realty, a process of risk taking.He has brought two fecking CBs for 30-40 milion pounds each. Who’s fault is that they are not starting? By all accounts Jose chooses his transfer targets. He chose Lindelöf instead of Maguire just a year ago. How is he not backed?
Or every decade on current form?Do we always have someone to blame?
We're 2nd. Not relegated.
Sometimes we just have to accept we can't win it every year.
I see Zidane at Juventus next; success will follow. As long as these ex players are tactically capable as alot of midfielders are - managing their clubs from their playing careers ensures a level of best interest & understanding the club's type of football that can breed success much deeper than a manager with just a few successful tactics & experience.I'm sure he will be found out in his next job. I hope it isn't at Old Trafford.
It's become an awful comedic reference between our fans on the Internet, but I would have loved to have seen Giggs given a chance. I know that there was an out of context video which convinced many the opposite, but I'd rather we risk it with one of our own.I see Zidane at Juventus next; success will follow. As long as these ex players are tactically capable as alot of midfielders are - managing their clubs from their playing careers ensures a level of best interest & understanding the club's type of football that can breed success much deeper than a manager with just a few successful tactics & experience.
United need to go for a Manager of our own next.
I won't back either, really. Obviously I want the manager to get what he wants in terms of players, but I don't believe Mourinho will take us anywhere.Anybody who's backing the board over Mourinho doesn't have the best interests of Manchester United at heart.
Ask yourself who wants the title more? The Glazers or Mourinho?
is it really wise to give Jose another 200m to spend it on players the next manager will not use/have a problem to get rid of? Maybe they are not confident that he can convert the investment he´s had so far into anything and are getting ready for another manager to back who is just not available or ready:-) I am sure they would question him for getting Bailly and Lindelof for about 60m who were not able to adapt or perform being outperformed by academy products or players who are at the club for long like Smalling.Anybody who's backing the board over Mourinho doesn't have the best interests of Manchester United at heart.
Ask yourself who wants the title more? The Glazers or Mourinho?
The Glazers are only interested in the financial side of the game. Top 4 and no top 4 is a big financial plummet so they spend to get in there. Winning the title is a sporting success that doesn't really reward too much more money wise than coming 2nd.
They have a top 4 squad and are happy with it. Look at what City did last summer and what Liverpool are doing this summer. They're building on what they have.
I think some on here need to give their heads a wobble.
I refuse to believe this. We've spent a shitload the past 5 years! When this all inevitably goes tits up, Jose will rightly be blamed.It comes down to the glazers using the club to line their own pockets. They will spend as little as possible to keep us in the top four and as long as their profits keep flowing they will be content. Contrast that with City who have owners that will spend when and where its needed to keep them at the top. We can make excuses about City being funded by oil but we make more profit than any other club in the world. How long do we settle for being the new Arsenal.
This is a question which I would like answered.So why buy Dalot instead of an experienced player? I don't get Jose. If he wanted someone to jump right in, why buy Dalot who is not only young, but also out until September. Doesn't make sense.
You cannot argue with the Martial fanboys.And if the next manager falls out with Martial? Should he be sacked as well? Why not let Martial manage the club as well?
We've spent a lot for a Liverpool type of club. We're the biggest football business in the world. We're by no means flexing our muscle as much as we can. We saw what money can do with Sanchez.I refuse to believe this. We've spent a shitload the past 5 years! When this all inevitably goes tits up, Jose will rightly be blamed.
I always felt this was half the truth. My contention is related to what's been discussed plenty in the Director of Football thread. We really should have one. It would, in my opinion, help mitigate some of this manager versus board/ceo conflict. I think we'd also see a more consistent and effective transfer policy regardless of who is manager at the time.Seriously believe SAF just got really stingy towards the end. Everyone ignores him repeatedly saying the board never refused him funds and instead chuck it up to him being a saint to help cover for the Glazers. The board also wasn't why he didn't pay am extra 4m for Hazard
I understand where you are you coming from, but still disagree. Mainly, its not even Woody in particular that I'm having issues with. It's the board of directors as a whole. As I'm noting above, I think the lack of a footballing director is a really big issue. The spending you mention, while great, was not done in a really sustainable or effective way. The number of large deadline day deals (Falcao, Martial, Fellaini that I can think of off top of my head) is so indicative of a really, really poor process. And that's not the manager to blame. I don't even want to put it all on Woodward. Go up the channel and sort it out with a DOF. Maybe that's not the perfect solution, but the problem needs addressing.That was under Gill. Under Woody, who you are fed up of, we’ve been very free spending.
They hired Moyes solely on the back of fergie recommending him. After guiding the club sucessfully for so long they were not wrong to trust him in this decision, albeit it went disastrously, but that was on Moyes himself.
The biggest mistake with Moyes was not sacking him earlier.
Holidays? From what? Do your job and then take a 9 month holiday during the season you Glazer feckwit.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Isnt it 4 years?He is not exactly going to say "yep were getting all my targets and the negotiations are going great". Plenty of times he deflects the question because he does not want to give too much away depending on the situation. There is no point picking on the comments that can be portrayed as negative. What about his other comments about EW, "It's not easy he's working very hard to get what we want" etc etc. He also recently said "I don't deal with negotiations or agents at all its Mr Woodwards department". Using the words "Mr. Woodward" is a mark of respect with a little humour as it's his boss after all. Other managers do the same or they say "The chairman". No point trying to make something of nothing.
I am sure their relationship is fine or he would not have been kept here nor would he have been given an extension just recently to take his time here up to 6 years.
Wasn’t that confirmed to be Bs?Woodward on holiday with the window closing in about 2 weeks? I think its fair to say we shouldn't expect anything at this point.
Honestly I can see where you’re coming from to an extent. Ever since the Moyes debacle, I have also strongly believed that we needed a DOF. We should have tried to get players from the best fergie era teams involved in the set up at United, like VDS who we let go to Ajax, I’m sure ex players like him would have had a lot to offer the club, and no matter what, I whole heartedly agree with you that we need a DOF. We need some kind of continuinity in what we’re trying to achieve as a club, and that won’t come from businessmen.I always felt this was half the truth. My contention is related to what's been discussed plenty in the Director of Football thread. We really should have one. It would, in my opinion, help mitigate some of this manager versus board/ceo conflict. I think we'd also see a more consistent and effective transfer policy regardless of who is manager at the time.
I understand where you are you coming from, but still disagree. Mainly, its not even Woody in particular that I'm having issues with. It's the board of directors as a whole. As I'm noting above, I think the lack of a footballing director is a really big issue. The spending you mention, while great, was not done in a really sustainable or effective way. The number of large deadline day deals (Falcao, Martial, Fellaini that I can think of off top of my head) is so indicative of a really, really poor process. And that's not the manager to blame. I don't even want to put it all on Woodward. Go up the channel and sort it out with a DOF. Maybe that's not the perfect solution, but the problem needs addressing.
And this season, the manager and scouts have done their homework well in advance. If you look at these previous transfer windows, there's no reason to think we will have a smooth window. Come deadline day again and I'd not be surprised to see some big money thrown around as a last ditch effort.
It's almost reactionary. Tie Fergie and Gill's hands with transfers. Have so little footballing management ability as to then go forward with Sir Alex's nepotistic pick for successor (that's no slight on the man...everyone makes mistakes but a fecking businessman should know better than to have let this happen even without the footballing pedigree). And then the Woodward chapter, building Disneyland, splashing money in a manner that's just not effective enough for me , expecting it to undo the previous decisions.
Take the manager out of the equation. Take woodward out of the equation. I still see an issue.
Completely agree.I refuse to believe this. We've spent a shitload the past 5 years! When this all inevitably goes tits up, Jose will rightly be blamed.
If he takes on Pogba it will be the end for him.Not only vs board:
Mourinho vs Pogba
Mourinho vs Martial
I like your common sense.is it really wise to give Jose another 200m to spend it on players the next manager will not use/have a problem to get rid of? Maybe they are not confident that he can convert the investment he´s had so far into anything and are getting ready for another manager to back who is just not available or ready:-) I am sure they would question him for getting Bailly and Lindelof for about 60m who were not able to adapt or perform being outperformed by academy products or players who are at the club for long like Smalling.
BTW, this all "Board vs Mou" is just speculation. What can board do when Real asks for 250m for Bale who is injury prone and Mou says he wants him or 80m for Perisic/Willian whos price will go down right nthe first season... I don´t know but United if we are after unrealistic targets who´s mistake it is? Surely it is Moyes all over again
Yes, he always goes on holiday this time of yeardid he really say Woodward is on holiday?
I assume it is a verbal quoteThis is fake tweet. I can't seem to find this quote anywhere.
Do a basic search before posting fake quotes like this.
What...?I assume it is a verbal quote
What did he mean by you can’t “find” the quote?What...?