Of course it is an agenda when it is the reason for you to act smug. You use a good game where he got appreciated all over on here to look down on people who you think wronged you after games where the player was poor. As if good games are a more valuable currency than bad games. People who have criticised Bruno do so, because they think he isn't the best player United, their favorite club, can have. Even if you and a few others don't seem to be able to accept that and start talking of hate and negativity. Bruno received some criticism and some of it is over the top. And it isn't really helpful behaviour to call people out after particularly bad games. But what you did here is the exact same thing - you called people out after a good game. And you seem to think in your case it is justified and just behaviour, because you consider your reasons to do so as superior. They are not - you choose to feel confirmed by a good game. Others feel confirmed after a bad game. It is just opinions. Every one just as worthless as the next one.I'm not sure whether supporting someone that has been our best player for years now can be considered an agenda, can it? I'd argue that's called 'being a fan'.
By all means, do whatever you want but don't complain when after the next bad game there is movement in here again and you don't like it. You are just as invested and triggered by this topic as other people are, time to acknowledge that.