Judas
Open to offers
It's gone painfully quiet.
Stay strong my brother.It's gone painfully quiet.
Good news for us. It's usually our PR BS to then boast how "we beat City to [X] signature".City in for him now.
People still writing off 20yr olds eh?3, 4 years. He's really generous, you must admit.
No, no, no, for goodness sakes no!!City in for him now.
Of course. Cafe experts in full force.People still writing off 20yr olds eh?
No player doesn't have a question mark hanging over them though, no ones a sure thing, especially coming to our club.Anyone else feel like the club is frozen by past mistakes that they're now unwilling to go in for players that have any sort of question mark hanging over them?
Sporting came to us and doubled their evaluation overnight. Its ridiulous from them, why even approach us at all?for the life of me I can't understand how we haven't got this deal done already.
1. Sporting need to sell.
2. The player wants to come to United.
3. We desperately need a center midfielder.
How is Ed Woodward still in charge? I just don't get it and am beyond frustrated with how our club is being run.
6 years of malfeasance is why Ed is the bad guy. Why can Sporting carry on like this? Because Ed and Judge are soft touches. Even when they walk away from a deal the selling club know they will come right back and pay the money they were asking for in the first place.Sporting came to us and doubled their evaluation overnight. Its ridiulous from them, why even approach us at all?
Nobody is paying that for Bruno. Why is Ed the bad guy for refusing to follow through on a universially acknowledged bad deal?
Sporting have made a pigs ear of this and he is the answer to their financial woes that they think he is.
Right. And that, after last week insisting Bruno play against Benfica. Sporting might actually be worse at this transfer thing than Ed...Sporting came to us and doubled their evaluation overnight. Its ridiulous from them, why even approach us at all?
Nobody is paying that for Bruno. Why is Ed the bad guy for refusing to follow through on a universially acknowledged bad deal?
Sporting have made a pigs ear of this and he is the answer to their financial woes that they think he is.
This does not mean what you think it does.6 years of malfeasance is why Ed is the bad guy. Why can Sporting carry on like this? Because Ed and Judge are soft touches. Even when they walk away from a deal the selling club know they will come right back and pay the money they were asking for in the first place.
I doubt it's even that, as it's only being reported in once place.So Sporting are briefing City's 'interest' to panic us into action? That's what I'd take from the latest PR developments.
Malfeasance? He may well be shit but I don't think he's committed a crime.6 years of malfeasance is why Ed is the bad guy. Why can Sporting carry on like this? Because Ed and Judge are soft touches. Even when they walk away from a deal the selling club know they will come right back and pay the money they were asking for in the first place.
Probably heard the word being used on Trump recentlyThis does not mean what you think it does.
Malfeasance? He may well be shit but I don't think he's committed a crime.
Might get away with nonfeasance:Probably heard the word being used on Trump recently
Malfeasance is any act that is illegal or wrongful. Misfeasance is an act that is legal but improperly performed. Nonfeasance, by contrast, is a failure to act that results in harm.
Come on Pex, you out??You lot still going?
I don’t think this was ever on, we were offered a player at a silly price and we looked into it but ultimately declined.
No, it wouldn’tWould be absolutely hilarious if city came in and bought him, would love to hear Eds reactions
I thought the player had already agreed terms though unless that is bullshit, if so I wouldn’t think it’s all bluster, Sporting just want to get as much as they can and given who they are dealing with I wouldn’t blame them and therein lies the problem. Ed is now known for being a soft touch.Is like ground hog window day in this thread. Had it all summer long, now here it is again and thus far it’s all been hot air and bullsturd.
Nothing to see here just a club using our name to market their only saleable asset who they’ve put an overly large transfer fee on, that no one will pay, just like in the summer.
Some people would think we are running a well run business here.Looks dead in the water. Genuinely amazed this club finds new ways to look stupid every day. Imagine saying you don't want a player in the summer, to then go for him in January to seemingly walk away when the play wants to come.
What honestly the feck are we doing
I was never really in mate. I think we’ve always evaluated him as squad player quality and we are not looking to spend our budget on a player that we don’t expect to be first choice in 3 months time let alone 12.Come on Pex, you out??
I kind of think this is true too. We don't want to blow our beans on this deal and then be woefully short in the summer. We'd have him if we could get him for what we consider a reasonable fee, but it just isn't looking like we can.I was never really in mate. I think we’ve always evaluated him as squad player quality and we are not looking to spend our budget on a player that we don’t expect to be first choice in 3 months time let alone 12.