Stretfordender
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,096
The problem is Glazers and Woodward end of.
100% they are the biggest problem.The problem is Glazers and Woodward end of.
You’re comparing owners who invested the second highest net spend over the past 5 years and brought in LVG and Mourinho to Bury and Bolton?Also, if anyone doubts the dangers of bad owners, just take a glance at the Bury and Bolton thread.
Or, for a more direct comparison... Liverpool a decade ago under Hicks and Gillette.
No, hence the second paragraph with a direct comparison with awful owners and the damage they can do.You’re comparing owners who invested the second highest net spend over the past 5 years and brought in LVG and Mourinho to Bury and Bolton?
It's not the Glaziers fault that managers have wasted the clubs money. We have spent enough to be challenging for the title. The Glaziers don't decide who we buy, or don't coach them on the training pitch, neither can they dictate a players performance.100% they are the biggest problem.
However that doesn't mean Ole is perfect either. Had he never played for us they'd not have even picked up the phone for him, let's be honest.
Ole will not achieve 20% of what Jose has in his career. Probably less than that actually.
Sadly most teams will sit deep against us.I have said before on here that this side is good enough to get top four both in it's own right and by virtue of the fact that Arsenal, Tottenham and Chelsea will drop a lot of points. Some of the problems we have faced are down to poor chance conversion. If things had been just slightly different, we could easily have 10 points. The results have been very disappointing but the performances have not been ragged. That said we need to sort out how to breakdown defences that defend deep. This is the third time we have lost points against deep lying defences.
How hard did you look mate?
https://talksport.com/football/513310/david-moyes-manchester-united-sign-gareth-bale-real-madrid/
The rest are easy to find with a quick Google as well, like this.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...Ander-Herrera-and-Romas-Daniele-De-Rossi.html
I said the club were willing to back Moyes financially and that they were willing to pay a world record for Bale. Both are true and that link is Moyes confirming that we made a bid for Bale. What more do you want another one, ok?It does not show Moyes dithered or tried to buy him at the end of the window, it just says everything was in place from our side. Same for Herrera, it just says that Herrera had not put in a transfer request even though we had reached the buyout clause. There is no source there on any other players.
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...avid-Moyes-Gareth-Bale-Cesc-Fabregas-transferHe told BBC Radio Five Live: “I spoke to Gareth Bale a couple times but he had his heart set on joining Real Madrid.
“We tried to change it but we couldn’t do so. We offered more money to Tottenham at that time.
You said Moyes dithered and ran out of time, nothing in there shows that. You are just linking vague statements and pushing that it supports what you have said, when they do not. It is just a narrative with nothing to really back it up.I said the club were willing to back Moyes financially and that they were willing to pay a world record for Bale. Both are true and that link is Moyes confirming that we made a bid for Bale. What more do you want another one, ok?
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...avid-Moyes-Gareth-Bale-Cesc-Fabregas-transfer
On Herrera here is Graham Hunter speaking about a conversation he had with Moyes in 2013, where Moyes confirms we were in for Herrera (as if that needed confirming). It also details that it was the Club and not him that decided to move for Herrera when ideally he wanted to wait another 12 months.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/blog/name/93/post/1908047/headline
DeRossi himself confirming he could have joined United in the summer of 2013.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jan/03/daniele-derossi-roma-suicide-manchester-united
Anything else you need me to Google for you mate, or can you take it from here?
You said Moyes dithered and ran out of time, nothing in there shows that. You are just linking vague statements and pushing that it supports what you have said, when they do not. It is just a narrative with nothing to really back it up.
Do you know where the nickname Dithering Dave came from mate?He liked him and a year and a half earlier wouldn't have hesitated to sign him, because his scouting of the young Basque midfielder was extremely detailed, but his "eyes-on" work on Herrera had diminished since.
Thus, his ideal position was to scout him for six to 12 months, get to Athletic games personally as well as listen to the United player assessors ... and then act or reject.
A couple of days later I got a text from Moyes to the effect that "the club," i.e. executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward, had decided to go "all in" on the last day of the transfer window and to try to pull the deal off.
100% they are the biggest problem.
However that doesn't mean Ole is perfect either. Had he never played for us they'd not have even picked up the phone for him, let's be honest.
Ole will not achieve 20% of what Jose has in his career. Probably less than that actually.
We do.Your problems have stemmed from sacking Moyes and Van Gal too early in my opinion. You need to stick with Ole now or this cycle will continue.
Yeah, I'm sure...Your problems have stemmed from sacking Moyes and Van Gal too early in my opinion. You need to stick with Ole now or this cycle will continue.
We certainly should not be sacking OGS this season-there is no point.The one consistent all through these dire 7 years, the people who single handedly destroy any momentum we might get.
They fecked over Moyes in the window with a display of incompetence never seen at this club. They then went and signed players the next manager didn't want. They then looked to have got it right for once and then fecked over that manager by giving him nothing to build on our best period post Fergie.
We are constantly in a state of transition because managers are not being allowed to build a squad. They are getting a window or two at best and then the rug is swiftly pulled from beneath them.
Now Ole has been heavily restricted in the market and our squad looks laughably thin.
I am not defending each manager outright, but as a group. Moyes, van Gaal, Mourinho and now Ole have all been hamstrung by the owners and their lapdog. No manager, of any ability would succeed here, not any better than Jose did anyway because it's a case of one step forward, 3 steps back.
Sacking Ole just starts the process again. Nothing changes while they run the show.
I think most teams struggle to break teams down barring the top 2 but even then they can slip up.We do.
The thing is we haven't really been that bad but the results have been poor. We can' break teams down but that isn't something new, we've struggled with that since Fergie left. IF Solskjaer can get them to at least punish some of these teams that sit deep against us AND our luck changes we'll be absolutely fine.
Solskjaer will get the whole season anyway. He's only had one window and I think everyone bar a minority can see it's not enough to fix our problems. He'll get until December 2020 at the very least.
Hmm.
I have very little time for the owners but that is what they are; owners. They might not be that best but it is obvious that their main objective is growing their investment.
To my mind the primary problem lies with those who are actually running the club./QUOTE]
They are running the club in the way the owners want. Surely this is blindingly obvious by now.
Jose is our most successful manager post Fergie. He wasn't perfect by any means but had he been backed last summer I think we'd have got top 4 again and he'd still be manager.
Which matters nowt. José still proved an awful appointment. Pochettino for example still doesn’t have a trophy to his name, and will likely never come close to Mourinho in accumalated trophies but you can bet your ass there’s no Spurs fans out there dreaming ”what ifs” about Mourinho..
Ole could win absolutely nothing for us and still be a healthier and more succesful managerial appointment for us than Mourinho.
You are so right. That's why Pogba is playing deep and Lingard/Mata upfront. The team only has two reliable central midfielders. He can't play three because he doesn't have them. Maybe Fred will turn up one day metamorphosized into a pretty good CMF but I doubt it.Not replacing Herrera is one of the most mental/mind boggling decisions that I can think of... and I seriously doubt that was Ole's decision.
Think what you want, the guy spent over 400 million on players and this is the squad we have to show for it. He was a trainwreck and if we’d have backed him further we’d have lost the few talented players we have left to his scorched-earth management.Jose is our most successful manager post Fergie. He wasn't perfect by any means but had he been backed last summer I think we'd have got top 4 again and he'd still be manager.
Look at the state of us now.
I still don't mind Jose i never hated him but i have to agree. Had he stayed the squad would be in an even worse state than it is now. He was only ever building for his own short term goals no matter how much it cost.Think what you want, the guy spent over 400 million on players and this is the squad we have to show for it. He was a trainwreck and if we’d have backed him further we’d have lost the few talented players we have left to his scorched-earth management.