Nnnnnnnnnnnnnyeeeah of course
Champions League Final: Liverpool v Real Madrid | Hala Madrid!
- Thread starter PoTMS
- Start date
Ah I see, saw someone mention it was because he's behind the 'keeper. Thanks for clearing that up.
It should be one player, not two I'm not sure why its two.
An in-deliberate tackle.
Bad referee and bad "expert". Goes hand in hand.Peter Walton can feck off. He has no idea what he's talking about. Struggling to get his words out.
I'm not really sure any of that makes sense. Fabinho deliberately goes for a tackle and the ball comes off him. Even if you ignore that then Kounate deliberately makes a tackle just before that as well.
So the last 3 touches were Liverpool players and it ends up with Benzema and its disallowed
I hope everyone agrees that Real Madrid doesn't deserve to be up a goal. They got dominated.
Gerrard happy about that rule, thoughAbsolute nonsense rule. Only counts if a player deliberately gives the ball to the opposition player
Heineken can feck off as well
They’ve really fecked up the rules in recent times.
Exactly!
Haven’t seen a single angle where he plays it.
It's absolute nonsense. Clear goalDeliberate play implies they have to be a little psychics
The annoying part about this is Peter Walton. He’s wrong.
He’s saying Fabinho’s touch was not deliberate which leaves it open to interpretation and corruption.
In what planet is a slide tackle tackle not a deliberate act unless you’re on ice or a wet pitch?
He’s saying Fabinho’s touch was not deliberate which leaves it open to interpretation and corruption.
In what planet is a slide tackle tackle not a deliberate act unless you’re on ice or a wet pitch?
He went to win the ball, how the feck is that not deliberate?
This! It is a Konate clearance, it gets deflected on Fabinho's knee. Two Liverpool players. It was a goal.
It's a ridiculously dodgy decision, in a massive game. Less question marks if it was given than not.
A really far cry from all of those years when English clubs were consistently properly fecked by referees in Europe when Spanish opposition was in front.
Put Camavinga in and Kroos out, you need to have some energy in that midfield.
And that's a feckin goal, you know it by the amount of time it get them to call it.
And that's a feckin goal, you know it by the amount of time it get them to call it.
Is Philip Walton on crack?
If the ball is played into the goalscorer's path by an opposition player, it's onside whether it was accidental or otherwise. The rule has always been that way, right?
If the ball is played into the goalscorer's path by an opposition player, it's onside whether it was accidental or otherwise. The rule has always been that way, right?
This
https://streamff.com/v/bf25f7
0:32. Konate tackles the ball onto Fabinho
Go to specsavers in the morning sunshine
Fecking joke. its 100% goal
What the hell is this rule even. What player will play the ball deliberately to the opponent. This doesnt make sense
But the pass wasn’t meant for Benzema hence the crazy deflections. I still can’t believe this, a defender slides in , wins the ball and it’s not deliberate.
The whole things is a mess. The worst part isn’t Fabinho but the Liverpool player who gets in the first deflection, there’s no argument he isn’t trying to play the ball most of all.
Can't really blame UEFA for
It's bullshit, why is Fabinho sliding if he's not deliberately trying to play the ball
Deliberate action - as in passing backwards and the ball being intercepted, as opposed to a deflection.
As per the rules (I’ve just learned that rule) it isn’t a goal.
We have been robbed and the final ruined.
Exactly this. The argument would be that Valverde is the only phase of play that matters. But it's clearly the wrong interpretation of ANOTHER ambiguous rule, so will be fixed in the offseason.
Football laws need desperately simplification, no one understands anymore.
Let me say it again for all the blind folk on the caf.
Valverde touches the ball, ergo its a block, not a pass.
Ergo, not a goal.
The rule is fine.
Its all you blind folk that's the problem.
Valverde touches the ball, ergo its a block, not a pass.
Ergo, not a goal.
The rule is fine.
Its all you blind folk that's the problem.
Disgusting. They got away with murder there.
If the ball hit the player accidentally then yeah it is not deliberate then going for a tackle ? Trying to win the ball, it's about a deliberate as it gets
Don’t make me laugh the moment it bounces off Konate into Fabinho it stops being an offisde. Konate plays that to Fabinho who fails to control the ball how can this be an offisde???I don't see how you can say that's involuntary for Fabinho... He literally tackles him
To be offside there has to be only one player between you and the goal or none.
Why would any footballer deliberately give the ball away. It has to be a deliberate action which it was from the two Liverpool players
Correct. The way people are interpreting deliberate is hilarious. Obviously no defender deliberately plays the ball to an attacker.
Liverpool to win it on pens for sure.
In a more understandable example, if a midfielder plays a slide rule pass through to a striker in an offside position and the keeper rushes out and fumbles it leaving the striker to score I’m assuming most on here would call it as offside even though the striker himself did not receive the ball from the player who passed it because it touched an opposing player in the interim.