I have no idea what this sentence meansOnly for City.. does saying "possibility of charges" is called commenting on the case.
I have no idea what this sentence meansOnly for City.. does saying "possibility of charges" is called commenting on the case.
The Athletic are champions of selective outrage. They have some great journalists who are more than capable to go in-depth on this, but they have decided since the beginning to be massive cheerleaders on it. They were giddy with anticipation when talking about the summer window in that podcast.Just heard yesterday’s athletic football podcast, which is usually quite good, where they talked about City’s summer transfer window and how they’re likely to spend big.
Managed to not mention the charges or potential punishment once.
I was kind of impressed.
When the Athletic started I thought they where going to be different and unbiased. Guess I was wrong.The Athletic are champions of selective outrage. They have some great journalists who are more than capable to go in-depth on this, but they have decided since the beginning to be massive cheerleaders on it. They were giddy with anticipation when talking about the summer window in that podcast.
Martyn Zeigler is one of the very few who has been consistently tough on this.
Don't worry, they're always ready to do an exceptional podcast when there are job cuts at Manchester United or when there are bad decisions about the women's football team at Manchester United or when something related to Greenwood at Manchester United happens. Sanctimonious Adam Crafton (who is in fairness an excellent journalist) will come on to tell you how it's the worse thing to happen to football, while the elephant in the room destroys the couch and smashes the TV to bits.When the Athletic started I thought they where going to be different and unbiased. Guess I was wrong.
Exactly.. I wasn't even thinking about when they attack us(they all love kicking us when we're down). Just in general, "spread the love/hate". They never seem to cover these kind of news, maybe mention it, but go deep, like with those examples you mentioned.Don't worry, they're always ready to do an exceptional podcast when there are job cuts at Manchester United or when there are bad decisions about the women's football team at Manchester United or when something related to Greenwood at Manchester United happens. Sanctimonious Adam Crafton (who is in fairness an excellent journalist) will come on to tell you how it's the worse thing to happen to football, while the elephant in the room destroys the couch and smashes the TV to bits.
I think you have got confused by the phrase i wrote 'Real football fans'.The PSG fans going wild last night looked real enough to me.
Yea, or maybe more precisely ‘money talks bullshit and walks’.Laughable that there is all this delay. Money talks bullshit walks situation it seems.
I think you have got confused by the phrase i wrote 'Real football fans'.
I should have put 'real football' into quotes.
I'm not saying the fans aren't real, however pathetic sugar daddy fans act.
I'm saying that the clubs themselves aren't real. They're facsimiles. They are an artificial construct of what a real club has built but without the history and soul that got a real club to the top.
Your second paragraph is interesting. I wouldn't know how a City fan felt or if they will be honest enough to admit that the wins felt hollow after a few days of winning their first premier league or champions league.You're completely correct, but increasingly this point is being made to a generation of adults who have become adults through a period in which city normalised cheating. A lot of people in their 20s for example just don't grasp a time before City and that's ultimately been city's aim. Ride it out, play the long game and the chance to act was immediately. It should never ever have been allowed to happen.
That said, and I've made this point before, however good city fans felt after any of their tainted wins, will never come close to how for example a life long Wigan fan felt winning the FA cup. City fans think that because they feel joy it must mean it's real, but it isn't - its just the best joy available to a team that has cheated. Sleeping with a beautiful woman might feel amazing, but when you've paid for it it can only feel so good
Your second paragraph is interesting. I wouldn't know how a City fan felt or if they will be honest enough to admit that the wins felt hollow after a few days of winning their first premier league or champions league.
Those fans should be content watching the same teams spend hundreds of millions of pounds and scoop up trophies while their own club hope for once in a lifetime Leicester experience?You don't have to really. You just have to ask yourself how you or the majority of people you know would feel. If we were bought by Saudi tomorrow, spent 600m (in some world where we can circumvent FFP) and won the league next year or the year after, Im sure it would be a league success full of objectively exciting moments, but deep down there is simply no way it would feel the same as if Amorim happened to turn us around organically. What Leicester felt under Ranieri is not the same as city predictably winning a title under every single manager since they cheated the first one. We can do the whole 'nobody knows how another individual feels' until the end of time - but broadly speaking any football fan with a brain understands the difference between types of success, and broadly speaking globally, there is no respect for City as a football club. It could have been Southampton that were bought - and we'd be here talking about them.
Those fans should be content watching the same teams spend hundreds of millions of pounds and scoop up trophies while their own club hope for once in a lifetime Leicester experience?
Broadly speaking, maybe I don't have a brain (sports for me is just entertainment, I am not emotionally invested in any football club) so I would like to know if the different type of success really matters to those fans.
20 EPL titles in your cabinet yea I will wait for that fan with none to tell me that if a sugar daddy bought them and they won the league, it will feel hollow and meaningless because it wasn't organic.Ya i don't think you see sport the same way I do. If you're here rationalising UAE buying a random club to wash their global image and hoover up cups and titles I don't think there's much point is us talking anymore. You keep tuning in to sports for the reasons you want to
20 EPL titles in your cabinet yea I will wait for that fan with none to tell me that if a sugar daddy bought them and they won the league, it will feel hollow and meaningless because it wasn't organic.
Yes it is childlike and brainless. Then don't reply my post and it ends there. SimpleYour logic is so childlike. I've asked you politely to not bother continuing this trite tired pseudo argument to justify cheating
Yes it is childlike and brainless. Then don't reply my post and it ends there. Simple
Yea the child who doesn't want to continue the tired justification of cheating but wants to have the last word. Reply this my guy and I won't reply I promise. Good night amigoAs i said, childlike.
Yea the child who doesn't want to continue the tired justification of cheating but wants to have the last word. Reply this my guy and I won't reply I promise. Good night amigo
I'm not sure. I keep hearing different things. Some have said they can't appeal, while others have said they can.Hasn't it been established there is no means of appeal on this ruling?
Either way I wonder if FIFA have asked the PL nicely not to throw any shade on their new shiny Club World Cup - that finishes mid July
Would be funny of City get hit with unprecedented punishments whilst winning it
I'm not sure. I keep hearing different things. Some have said they can't appeal, while others have said they can.
Imagine the scenes if only 14 vote for them to be kicked out .'Rule B6 of the Premier League's Handbook stipulates that, in order to trigger the expulsion of one of its members, clubs would have to vote as part of a Special Resolution. This would require 15 clubs to vote in favour of expulsion.'
One can only hope.
What's going on with this? All gone hush hush again? Absolute piss take there's no decision announced yet.
'Rule B6 of the Premier League's Handbook stipulates that, in order to trigger the expulsion of one of its members, clubs would have to vote as part of a Special Resolution. This would require 15 clubs to vote in favour of expulsion.'
One can only hope.
I imagine that any sort of punishment that (presumably) includes a point deduction will be much cleaner to enact in the summer, rather than during the season when other teams can argue that the punishment will have influenced how their games went, both before and after.
If the punishment is handed out in the summer then there’s a clean slate without that added layer of complications.
There is an IT guy somewhere who knows.They said they expected any news to be delayed until the summer. Somebody knows though, so I’m surprised they’ve managed to keep a lid on it all this time.
If the city punishment is worth taking, then Newcastle's humble owners can start playing pass the parcel with brown envelopes to their heart's content.Hopefully Newcastle have realised that you can still build a successful team within the rules if you get your manager and recruitment right, but I still worry that they'd want to ditch the rules completely and go on a massive unrestricted spending spree.
They are apparently ready to pay the 160m€ that Leverkusen is asking for Wirtz.
Maybe its only negotiation tactics by Leverkusen though, the source is the Kicker, where certain journalists are basically their "propaganda machine" .
In that case im even more sure that nothing will happen to them.They said they expected any news to be delayed until the summer. Somebody knows though, so I’m surprised they’ve managed to keep a lid on it all this time.