City avoid transfer ban

Discussion in 'Football Forum' started by rpitroda, Aug 13, 2019 at 18:00.

  1. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:00
    #1

    rpitroda Full Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2013
    Messages:
    13,185
    Location:
    Los Pollos Hermanos...
  2. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:01
    #2

    ivaldo Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    22,053
    I for one am shocked, SHOCKED!
  3. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:02
    #3

    Spiersey Chelsea fan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    United Kingdom.
    Posted this in other thread, more apt here though.

    I was fully in favour of us getting a ban as we deserved it. Was also in favour of the ban being upheld even during the appeal process. However it now feels very harsh our punishment in light of this news Can't understand why City haven't been banned though, both clubs willingly and knowingly broke the rules. Other English clubs are being investigated currently about it as well, be interesting to see if anyone else is banned or in meaningless fines are handed out as well. City signed less players than us but they were still aware of what they were doing, they should have got a similar punishment.
  4. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:02
    #4

    NoLogo Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,279
    Location:
    I can't remember why I joined this war.
    Chelsea fans will love this. :lol:
  5. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:03
    #5

    Eboue nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    53,222
    Location:
    Hillary Clinton has been my friend for a decade
    Supports:
    Arsenal
  6. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:04
    #6

    Random Task Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,464
    Location:
    Chester
    So much for equal standards.

    Stinks of corruption.
  7. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:05
    #7

    El Zoido Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,492
    Location:
    UK
    You didn’t pay off the right people.
  8. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:05
    #8

    Dolf Full Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    Messages:
    2,186
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    “The disciplinary committee took into account the fact that Manchester City FC accepted its responsibility”

    Great, now take responsibility for where your money is coming from
  9. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:05
    #9

    JinnerJamie Small ginger

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,735
    Location:
    The Kings Town of Hull
    Russian money can’t buy FIFA post 2018... but Middle Eastern can until at least 2022
  10. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:06
    #10

    WhoAreYou? New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2015
    Messages:
    30
    Location:
    Catalunya
    Supports:
    Barcelona
    It appears City have not breached any rules after December 2016, when the interpretation of the rule(s) where made clear, while Chelsea has breached the rules after December 2016.

    But I guess it’s easier to yell “corruption” and “oil money” when a rival club doesn’t get punished for something they didn’t do.
  11. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:06
    #11

    Infra-red Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,667
    Location:
    left wing
    Chelsea need to increase the size of their brown envelopes.
  12. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:07
    #12

    How much? New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    I might be wrong but I think that we broke the rules (as they were poorly worded) on one maybe two occasions in relation to kids we had on trial playing in friendly games. Chelsea were found to have broken the rule 29 times, failed to comply with other registration requirements and also more seriously breached Article 18b . Chelsea were found guilty of breaching the rules on signing of minors, but also having influence in the transfer activities of other clubs and third parties on two separate occasions, so that maybe why your punishment was more severe.
  13. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:07
    #13

    Ace of Spades Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    3,027
    Shocking, I have never been as shocked ever before. :rolleyes::boring:
  14. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:08
    #14

    Zen86 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    7,700
    Location:
    That's the joke.
    A shocking development :lol:
  15. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:12
    #15

    Infestissumam Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    817
    Location:
    Austria
    I'm shocked. Didn't see this coming at all!
  16. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:13
    #16

    robinamicrowave Wanted to be bran, ended up being littlefinger

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,093
    Supports:
    Man City
    This isn't the end of it, is it? This doesn't seem like it's anything to do with the FFP / "Champions League ban" investigation?
  17. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:13
    #17

    HJ12 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    286
    What a joke. Essentially saying to every other club that it's okay to breach the rules, but when you're investigated just admit that you're guilty and pay the 400k fine or whatever it is.
    If you claimed ignorance of the rules at least you can hide behind the guise of stupidity (however unlikely that may be). Admission that you understood the rules and said feck em anyway, now that's a different level of we don't give a damn.
  18. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:15
    #18

    HJ12 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    286
    Correct. The Champions League ban's got to do with the football leaks info.
  19. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:16
    #19

    JJ12 Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2016
    Messages:
    3,591
    Location:
    Neath
    Is it because City admitted it and Chelsea kept denying it?

    Or are Chelsea being bummed?
  20. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:16
    #20

    andyox Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2018
    Messages:
    464
    Supports:
    Manchester City
    But you've pretty much answered your own question in your post. "City signed less players than us." Ergo, smaller punishment. Objectively, surely that makes sense that if you're found guilty of less charges, the punishment would be different?
  21. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:17
    #21

    sammsky1 Pochettino's #1 fan

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    22,915
    Location:
    Behind my 
    Not sure that makes total sense given it’s likely Qatar has some power now, if it exposed the 2022 skeletons. Not sure the princes of Abu Dhabi ahem any extra clout over FIFA.

    More likely to do with City’s threat to drown FIFA with lawyers if they dared find them guilty.
  22. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:18
    #22

    Morpheus 7 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,646
    Location:
    Ireland
    Shock horror
  23. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:19
    #23

    Spiersey Chelsea fan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    United Kingdom.
    Not really. The charges are still pretty severe, 9 players is a lot. City knew what they were doing as well, it isn't some error on their behalf. Barcelona were punished for 10 cases. Is the extra player justification for a 2 window transfer ban compared to a tiny fine? All the clubs are fully aware of the rules regarding u18s, the amount of players involved should be somewhat irrelevant unless it's a genuine mistake for 1 player.
  24. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:19
    #24

    fergiesarmy1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    403
    Does seem one rule for city and another for everyone else, still remember Ferdinand getting an eight month ban while that city player got fined 2k in similar circumstances.

    They werent even loaded with oil money then :nervous:
  25. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:19
    #25

    andyox Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2018
    Messages:
    464
    Supports:
    Manchester City
    For the sake of accuracy, we threatened to drown UEFA with lawyers, not FIFA.
  26. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:20
    #26

    ash_86 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,665
    I'd be more surprised if they have gotten a ban.
  27. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:20
    #27

    Igor Drefljak Definitely Russian

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    5,327
    Location:
    The Wastelands
    So wait, all we need to do is buy loads of these young promising kids and then admit to it, so we get a fine that doesn't actually matter...

    Interesting
  28. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:20
    #28

    LARulz Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    14,371
    :lol: so predictable
  29. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:21
    #29

    andyox Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2018
    Messages:
    464
    Supports:
    Manchester City
    Reporting is still coming out, but MEN is saying that we were only found guilty of charges related to two players, not nine.
  30. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:23
    #30

    Bastian Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2015
    Messages:
    7,713
    I don't care about their transfers, I just want them banned from the CL. Or is that another investigation?
  31. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:23
    #31

    Manchester Dan Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    2,396
    Supports:
    Man City
    I hope we appeal the fine...
  32. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:23
    #32

    Gasolin Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,171
    Location:
    NYC
    Still, Chelsea will be very confused now. I think the ban would have made sense, but now I hope they get at least a CL ban.
  33. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:24
    #33

    Ramshock CAF Pilib De Brún Translator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    38,989
    Location:
    Swimming against a tide of idiots and spoofers
    Quelle surprise
  34. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:25
    #34

    duffer Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's Scout

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    33,949
    Location:
    Chelsea fan.
    I don't care about them not getting a ban but a £315K fine for a club like Man City (or Chelsea) is utterly ridiculous and no disincentive at all.

    Part of me actually likes the ban. Without it I doubt any of our kids would get a chance and I've been wanting that for years.
  35. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:29
    #35

    Welby5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    202
    Supports:
    Chelsea
    OK about a lesser punishment for City, but the difference in punishment is massive! Chelsea's season has been hugely effected. Not only this season, but probably no CL football next season too. Meanwhile, City get fined a bag of peanuts. For all its great football your club (NOT IT'S FANS) stinks to high heaven and is as bent as a 9 pound note.
  36. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:31
    #36

    Denis79 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2014
    Messages:
    3,114
    I'm not informed about this matter, why were they under investigation?
  37. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:32
    #37

    fergiesarmy1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    403
    Take your fishing elsewhere, may as well just dump a million in fifa’s Account for the next pathetic fine they issue city.
  38. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:33
    #38

    robinamicrowave Wanted to be bran, ended up being littlefinger

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,093
    Supports:
    Man City
    Kolo Toure received a 6-month ban in 2010, to be fair.
  39. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:33
    #39

    Random Task Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,464
    Location:
    Chester
    Fifa said City breached article 19 of its regulations: "International transfers of players are only permitted if the player is over the age of 18."

    Chelsea were banned from signing players for two transfer windows for a similar rule breach - but the club are appealing to have that overturned.

    "The Fifa disciplinary committee has sanctioned English club Manchester City FC for breaches relating to the international transfer and registration of players under the age of 18," said football's world governing body in a statement.

    "Manchester City FC was found to have breached, among others, article 19 of the Fifa Regulations on the status and transfer of players.

    "The disciplinary committee took into account the fact that Manchester City FC accepted its responsibility and sanctioned the club with a fine of CHF 370,000."
  40. Aug 13, 2019 at 18:33
    #40

    Guy Incognito Full Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,243
    Location:
    Somewhere
    *pretends to be shocked*