City avoid transfer ban

Discussion in 'Football Forum' started by rpitroda, Aug 13, 2019.

  1. Aug 13, 2019

    andyox Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2018
    Messages:
    466
    Supports:
    Manchester City
    Genuinely I can see your point on the punishment. A small fine is obviously irrelevant to City and any PL club, obviously. But there has to be some degree of matching the size of punishment to the size of offence, and I think all City fans have been trying to say is that City's offence in terms of scale was very different to Chelsea's.

    In terms of future punishments, City's statement says that FIFA's regulations were updated in Dec 2016 (City's offences occurred before then), so maybe it'll be easier for FIFA to punish clubs more heavily if they now breach the updated regulations (no-one can plead ignorance or confusion of the regulations).
  2. Aug 13, 2019

    Wedge Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,518
    Location:
    Various fields
    Supports:
    a soft spot for Ajax
    They generate their own money you know :nervous::lol:
  3. Aug 13, 2019

    Gentleman Jim It's absolutely amazing!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,304
    Location:
    Salford
    Supports:
    city
    Disagree (surprise, surprise).
    The number of breaches, past infringements and cooperation with the authorities when caught rulebreaking are all factors in determining the punishment meted out. Presumably there is a tariff for guilty parties and both City and Chelsea were punished according to that tariff?
    City have been dealt with in line with FIFA's rules. You may not think the rules fair but that's another issue.
  4. Aug 13, 2019

    MileStolar New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2019
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Aren't we breaching the rules by signing Hannibal Mejbri?
  5. Aug 13, 2019

    SquishyMcSquish Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2018
    Messages:
    6,797
    Supports:
    Tottenham
    Scumbag club led by scumbag owners in getting away with scumbaggery shocker.


    Also :lol: at City fans pulling the race card because people are calling out their owners for being the fecking pond life that they are. They're absolutely the scum of the earth and shouldn't even be allowed to step in to the country, the only reason they're tolerated anywhere is because of their blood stained money.
  6. Aug 13, 2019

    Gentleman Jim It's absolutely amazing!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,304
    Location:
    Salford
    Supports:
    city
    As I just said to @Random Task the punishment is (presumably) in line with FIFA rules and is not means tested.
    Maybe in future fines should be a percentage of turnover so that financial giants will feel the pain as much as Forfar Athletic would if they were the guilty party but for the moment the rules have been enforced.
  7. Aug 13, 2019

    mad1max954 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    490
    What do you get when you have a corrupt organisation that’s state sponsored, investigated by a corrupt organisation that has proven state doping?

    Nothing.
  8. Aug 13, 2019

    Reiver Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,119
    Location:
    Near Glasgow
    They were fined what? £315000? Wow, that'll make them think twice. FIFA might as well have done nothing, it would have had the same effect.
  9. Aug 13, 2019

    BeforeKeanetherewasRobson Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,878
    Location:
    Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
    If I was a lawyer of another big club who was found guilty of signing 2 underage players, I'd be quoting this as a precedent... I can't see how FIFA could argue that anything other than a fine is passed else said club/lawyers go straight to CAS who'd surely have to overturn it.

    Between Chelsea's fine/ban and City's "fine", FIFA are effectively creating a scale for clubs/lawyers. At some point between 2 and 29, a pittance of a fine turns into a 2-window ban. Maybe worth risking 3-4 players.... just say you're sorry and await a fine?
  10. Aug 13, 2019

    tomaldinho1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Messages:
    3,846
    Basically were docked Aguero's salary for a week, a drop of water in the ocean.
  11. Aug 13, 2019

    Fluctuation0161 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,287
    Location:
    Manchester
    Don't play dumb. It doesn't have to be a personal count. You are effectively a state run club. Look at the state.

    Also, if you're going to respond to a question, not directed at you, with another question then just give it a rest.
  12. Aug 13, 2019

    Fluctuation0161 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,287
    Location:
    Manchester
    Point is there has been a systematic breaking of the same rule by the same club.

    Dodgy dodgy City. UAE FC.
  13. Aug 13, 2019

    Needham Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2013
    Messages:
    10,018
    This post has a hauntingly beautiful melody but it misses the point. Aguero won't have to pay the fine out of his wages.
  14. Aug 14, 2019 at 00:17

    andyox Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2018
    Messages:
    466
    Supports:
    Manchester City
    No that wasn't the point that was being debated, but crack on.
  15. Aug 14, 2019 at 00:23

    noodlehair "It's like..."

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,873
    Location:
    Flagg
    I don't understand these rules. Why is this a lesser offence than what Chelsea and the FA did? Why did Chelsea get severely punished for something the FA couldn't even get right? Did they just not cough up the bribe money?

    Why aren't we breaking the rules by signing that 16 year old from Ajax? Is there an exemption for players with silly hair?

    Why does Pep constantly moan about other team's spending when City spend so much the global ecomony is probably dependent on their transfers?
  16. Aug 14, 2019 at 01:51

    padr81 Mr. MoneyBags

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,944
    Supports:
    Man City
    Nobodies trying to turn it into a race war. The following is just plain xenophobic and its unavoidable that he'll get called out on it.
    "when there is an inevitable political/ physical war between that part of the Middle East when they stop becoming useful to the west, you can bet your life City will be used as political pawns that will be drained of life as a retaliation.

    It'll be nothing more than they deserved for selling their soul to the devil. Wonder how many of City's supporters realise that if their owners could click their fingers tomorrow and create their ideal world, none of them would be in it? In fact, they'd all either be enslaved or actively terminated, depending on sex, religion, ethnicity and or sexual orientation."

    It's also nothing to do with the topic in question which you are debating quite fairly without resorting to said measures. His whole argument is "Cites owners hate the minorities so that somehow equates to them being guilty of buying u18s from outside Europe needing a harsher punishment".
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2019 at 01:59
  17. Aug 14, 2019 at 01:52

    cesc's_mullet Get a haircut Hippy!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    26,026
    Supports:
    Hawthorn Football Club
    In totally, completely, definitely, most-assuredly, purely coincidental, please believe me, unrelated news every single Fifa big wig has bought themselves brand new mega mansions.
  18. Aug 14, 2019 at 01:57

    padr81 Mr. MoneyBags

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,944
    Supports:
    Man City
    Wrong, we're not a state run club. We are owned by one member of the royal family of said state who yes uses us as a PR vehicle for his state (and have many horrid pieces of shit on the board) but we are not owned by Abu Dhabi, but by Mansour, who as far as you or I can prove has zero deaths on his cv. To suggest anything else is ridiculous. The owner of Man City (singular) as far as I know has zero murders on his cv, I thought you might be able to inform me otherwise but as usual you are putting things together regards City which just aren't true.

    It's a post on a discussion forum which is hugely ill informed so I will discuss it on said discussion forum, you don't have to answer but I sure as hell can quote and try to debate said point until I'm told otherwise.
  19. Aug 14, 2019 at 02:05

    padr81 Mr. MoneyBags

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,944
    Supports:
    Man City
    Thats a pathetic argument, the equivalent of me saying the £ is easily the most bloodstained currency in the world and the british shouldn't be allowed anywhere because of their record (I'm a brit myself btw)
    .
    You find the post that we all quoted all tell me its not xenophobia and you are simply a liar. The fact that you think people posting like that is fine just because they are being racist against a scum bag is Tommy Robinson like logic buddy.
  20. Aug 14, 2019 at 02:06

    padr81 Mr. MoneyBags

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,944
    Supports:
    Man City
    Chelsea did it 29 times, were investigated on 93 counts. City did it twice and were investigated on 9 counts. The punishment is still far too lenient for the crime though and we should have faced somekind of reprecussions
  21. Aug 14, 2019 at 02:10

    padr81 Mr. MoneyBags

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,944
    Supports:
    Man City
    Thats a fair point but the key word is presumably, with my opinion of Fifa, Whom I tend to imagine are completely inconsistent with this rule (as they are with everything else) except being corrupt (they are great at being corrupt).

    Not that I'm accusing City of doing anything corrupt with this decision but I still feel the punishment is too soft.

    What is to stop United or Liverpool from signing two 16 y/o wonderkids when they know the punishment of £300k is a drop in the bucket when the worst case scenario is getting millions from selling them on, even if they only become Championship or lower half of the table quality players. Best case scenario is they become superstars.

    Fifa have set a precedent where imho its a risk worth taking.

    Thats why I think the fine shouldn't matter and a 1 window ban would have sufficed.
    Minor infraction 1 window - Major infraction 2 windows - Do an Atletico and you face 4-5 windows.
  22. Aug 14, 2019 at 02:14

    The Boy Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    526
    Supports:
    Brighton and Hove Albion
    The FFP investigation is separate.

    Who are you?
  23. Aug 14, 2019 at 02:50

    minh_loc_xoay New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2019
    Messages:
    189
    At least they can strengthen themselves properly and help us prevent Liverpool from winning the League, while we are in the process of another rebuild.
    Manchester City essentially saved England from Liverpool last season, with the final blow to Liverpool dealt by us (Drawing them on Old Trafford). Beautiful Manchester teamwork there.
  24. Aug 14, 2019 at 04:13

    Pavl3n Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Messages:
    970
    Now one of the rules about this article 19 is that the parents have to move toit the country of the club for non footballing reasons.
    If my son wanted to play for Manchester United and I believe that it would benefit his future footballing career, I'd be all for his move to the club. However these are footballing reason.
    I wouldn't move to Manchester for any non footballing reasons.
    How do you go about that rule?

    And also we have signed a few 16/17 years old into the academy, how is it that we are not breaching the rules?
  25. Aug 14, 2019 at 05:50

    Jimmy_Bond Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2019
    Messages:
    136
    You keep saying that my post was xenophobic. Do you have any idea what Xenophobia is?

    An example of a xenophobic post would be... "All Arabs don't approve of homosexuality, and would happily pass legislation to punish homosexuality by death." This is xenophobic as it wrongly perpetuates an incorrect and negative opinion based on Race/ Nationality.

    However, if someone were to say "the unelected government of UAE (of which your owner is the deputy Prime Minister and Royal Family member) doesn't approve of homosexuality, and would happily pass legislation to punish homosexuality by death." This is not xenophobia, this is a fact.

    Here is a link to a list of some of the things which are punishable by death in the state where your owner is deputy Primer Minister and active member of the Royal Family...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

    So included in the list are the following things..

    1. Adultery. This not only encompasses having an extra-marital affair, but also extends to having sex outside of marriage. It is also worth noting that if a woman is raped in UAE the burden of proof is on her is to prove she was raped otherwise she can be tried for adultery.

    2. Blasphemy. This includes showing contempt or lack of reverence to a Deity.

    3. Apostasy. Abandonment or renunciation of a religion.

    4. Homosexuality. Self explanatory.

    Other more serious crimes are included on the list, but I won't mention them as they're not 100% relevant to the point I'm making.

    So, how many of City fans, United fans, and pretty much the vast majority of western citizens (or cityzens ;) ) would fall victim to at least one of these laws were they being ruled (undemocratically) by the people running Manchester City, and as a consequence be potentially subjected to the death penalty? I'd wager pretty close to all of them.

    As a side note, here is the wikipedia page on human rights in the UAE...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

    So, as another poster said, you are using the race card here to try and villainise me in order to defend the disgraceful regime that you have running your football club. Not a single thing I said was xenophobic nor an attack against a race of people, it was an attack aimed at the hideous laws inflicted upon the citizens and visitors to the UEA by its unelected government (of which your owner is a senior member).

    I do apologise for taking the thread off topic, but I'm not willing to have lazy accusations thrown at me by people who will do anything to deflect criticism.
  26. Aug 14, 2019 at 08:08

    Classical Mechanic Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    23,916
    The disturbing thing is that the accusations of racism originated from their owners, a cynical tactic on their part to deflect criticism of their regime and ownership of City that is now being championed by their fans.
  27. Aug 14, 2019 at 08:31

    Jimmy_Bond Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2019
    Messages:
    136
    And most disturbing of all is that they turn up every week and sing the name of a man who could quite easily find enough offenses on the average Friday night out of any City/ United/ Football fan to have them quite literally hung, strung and quartered (were they residing in a state governed by him, of course).

    It's a sad reflection of the tribalism in football that a set of fans will do anything (including calling conspiracy and cynically using the race card) to avoid highlighting and admitting that the thing bringing them so much success is truly gruesome.

    I'm sure were we bought by some Middle Eastern Sheikh with similar blatant contempt for many of things that we celebrate in western culture (such as freedom of speech and expression) many fans would be singing and dancing as we'd undoubtedly dominate and rule to an extent even more hegemonic than City, as our spending spending would be even greater (no FFP restrictions, not that City have let little things like the rules stop them). I personally would stop my association with the club immediately.

    Some things are more important than football, such as the championing of basic human rights. Never thought I'd have to write that sentence.

    Cue the fingerpointing and the "look at you not at me-ism.."
  28. Aug 14, 2019 at 08:56

    Dr. StrangeHate Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    1,210
    Guys please leave Manchester City alone. They are necessary to save us from Liverpool for the next couple of years. When we are capable of challenging for the title we can bitch about them then. For the moment let's enjoy their wins.
  29. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:07

    noodlehair "It's like..."

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,873
    Location:
    Flagg
    How many times do you have to do it before it jumps from a nothing fine to a massive year long transfer ban? It seems like a dubious line/rule at best
  30. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:14

    B20 HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Messages:
    23,395
    Location:
    Disney Land
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    I'd love for city to get a hefty ban, but taken together, these are significant circumstances to take into account:

  31. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:17

    Reddy Rederson New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2018
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Unicorn Country.
    I would, but Im more of a 'the enemy of my enemy can feck off as well' kind of guy.
  32. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:21

    lysglimt Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    8,372
    I still Think this is a minor thing - it's the FFP that is the big bad one - and they deserve severe punishment for that. If they get off that one Easy, then we might as well give up.
  33. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:25

    SilentWitness ShoelessWitness Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    14,921
    Location:
    Scotland
    Supports:
    Everton
    Monaco to Manchester is 1700km :confused:

    Or does the EU rule overpower that part of the ruling?
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2019 at 09:54
  34. Aug 14, 2019 at 09:39

    sun_tzu The Art of Bore

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    12,995
    Location:
    Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.
    No... But it will probably be the last time we can sign an U18 player from the EU as the rules are

  35. Aug 14, 2019 at 10:09

    sun_tzu The Art of Bore

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    12,995
    Location:
    Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.
    He's moving to within 100km of Manchester... Which makes that rule irrelevant.
  36. Aug 14, 2019 at 10:10

    SilentWitness ShoelessWitness Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    14,921
    Location:
    Scotland
    Supports:
    Everton
    Ah, that was a brainfart on my behalf. Makes sense now. I assumed it meant that the club you're buying from had to be within 100km. :lol:
  37. Aug 14, 2019 at 10:12

    AceUnited New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    44

    Seems like the rules are different for the teams with "Oily Sugar Daddies".
  38. Aug 14, 2019 at 10:28

    deleon Full Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    690
    Should just give City a one-year ban, and extend Chelsea's ban for another 28 windows.

    Only way to make it fair :wenger:
  39. Aug 14, 2019 at 11:08

    Blueman New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2017
    Messages:
    43
    Supports:
    Man City
    I suspect that might get thrown out too. Sorry to say but there has been a shedload of negative reports about City, mainly from reporters and outlets who just dont want City because they dont bring the clicks, they want the cosy big fanbase clubs bringing in more clicks and income. So what we're getting is a distorted view of the situation..

    The media wont tell these details in their clamour for hate clicks but some of the facts are:

    1 - The FFP relates to 2014 breach (From 2011/12 accounts) - The day after city published their 2013/14 accounts showing we had met FFP UEFA changed the FFP ruleset
    2 - City have already been investigaed (and fined) by UEFA with this breach of FFP
    3 - City agreed a deal with UEFA themselves to meet FFP and pay the fine for this breach
    4 - The information comes from hacked email accounts
    5 - Leaks to the press about a closed investigation - And then add to that the "hostile actors" of Qatar, Utd, LFC, Bayern being involved in the case
    6 - The accusation that FFP has been set up by UEFA and the european elite to keep the elite at the top (For which there is a separate case)

    Given all the above points I think that the FFP sanctions that the media are hoping for wont come, I also have a slight feeling it will result in FFP being changed or removed altogether.

    There's a good writeup from a decent City fan, a guy who looks into these things with an impartial eye, long long read though - https://boltfromtheblue.live/2018/11/18/how-uefa-shifted-the-goalposts-to-shaft-man-city/

    So, UEFA want to keep FFP. City want to be at the top table in European football. The most likely outcome (I think) is that City will be found to be compliant (Or get a hefty fine). Seems most likely to me, but tbh there's so much cloak and dagger stuff, so much money and deals involved that anything can happen I suppose
  40. Aug 14, 2019 at 11:08

    Random Task Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,552
    Location:
    Chester
    Plus a 4-game ban for Evra.

    Fair is fair.