christinaa
Gossip Girl
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2012
- Messages
- 11,548
- Supports
- There's only one United!
Just void the season and gift Liverpool 80% of the trophy already for the games played. They'll top up the rest themselves.
Just void the season and gift Liverpool 80% of the trophy already for the games played. They'll top up the rest themselves.
Read the same. And while that's nice to hear and all, it's still hinging on the condition that it's safe for everyone to play again.Per the athletic fifa have indefinitely extended the season. Contracts extended and transfer window to be moved
FIFA is to confirm an indefinite extension to the 2019-20 season across the globe, allowing each country’s football authority to determine when campaigns can finish.Per the athletic fifa have indefinitely extended the season. Contracts extended and transfer window to be moved
can someone just ban this parasite and his disgraceful chums.& yet over 1,200 children die every day from malaria & have done for years. Maybe some lives are more important than others to us westerners. Maybe deep down we're all just bullshit hypocrites.
FIFA is the overseer right. So everything moves as per their edict? I'm ok for a vaccine to be prepared and resume this season in 2024.Sounds like a legal nightmare. FIFA imposing that playing contracts are extended beyond July when plenty of teams will have already accounted for players being released.
ridiculous.Per the athletic fifa have indefinitely extended the season. Contracts extended and transfer window to be moved
Im sick and tired of the focus being on the super rich clubs.Sounds like a legal nightmare. FIFA imposing that playing contracts are extended beyond July when plenty of teams will have already accounted for players being released.
I can't see the present season being left in limbo such are the financial stakes. Money talks and if BCD is neccessary it'd happen. Scrapping it and just starting 2020/21 in August is wishful thinking, especially as social distancing measures will most likely continue into late summer.It's difficult to see any football being played much before September (and even then, it would be behind closed doors), but that doesn't necessarily mean that this season can't/won't be finished, it's just that it would have to eat in to next season a little.
That might seem undesirable, but given that the current COVID-19 modelling predicts a series of waves of infection (with corresponding lockdowns with each upsurge), it is likely that next season will be significantly (possibly fatally) disrupted anyway.
Maybe the best thing to do is finish 2019/20 off in late August/September, and then more-or-less write off 2020/21 (at least in the traditional 38 game league sense) and come up with a different format for the games, involving significantly fewer fixtures.
Imagine a club relegated last season were still lumped with a high-salaried player they couldn’t shift in the transfer window and were counting on getting him off the books on the 30th of June. Now, in FIFA’s eternal wisdom, said club have to continue paying said player until August/September/October/insert your own arbitrary date here.Sounds like a legal nightmare. FIFA imposing that playing contracts are extended beyond July when plenty of teams will have already accounted for players being released.
So some clubs will have players who they have paid for this season up until June but cannot afford to pay any further, or the player quite within their legal rights has decided that they do not wish to return beyond their contract end in June.FIFA is to confirm an indefinite extension to the 2019-20 season across the globe, allowing each country’s football authority to determine when campaigns can finish.
The game’s world governing body will also alter the dates of the summer transfer window and permit contract extensions for players whose deals run out on June 30.
Nothing will be automatically be extended
Fortunately they didnt say this, they just said they "will permit contract extensions", thats very different to actually extending everybody's contracts.ridiculous.
Im sick and tired of the focus being on the super rich clubs.
how on earth can you impose contract extension on lower league clubs. They will all need to be releasing players and they are running out of cash fast. Unilateral extension of contracts is an astonishingly bad idea and will lead to clubs going bust.
BCD only works for the PL, and its just too problematic with the potential for accidents, spreading of the virus, etc. Clubs are already under the PR hammer, can you imagine the fall out if a player has a car accident, or breaks a leg? What if a club has a covid problem and cant field a team? Clubs will be very wary of starting before things are very clear.I can't see the present season being left in limbo such are the financial stakes. Money talks and if BCD is neccessary it'd happen. Scrapping it and just starting 2020/21 in August is wishful thinking, especially as social distancing measures will most likely continue into late summer.
Only if you can't read. Nothing will be extended automatically (nor is that possible from a legal POV).Imagine a club relegated last season were still lumped with a high-salaried player they couldn’t shift in the transfer window and were counting on getting him off the books on the 30th of June. Now, in FIFA’s eternal wisdom, said club have to continue paying said player until August/September/October/insert your own arbitrary date here.
As you said, a complete legal nightmare.
Any thoughts on a solution for team who unavoidably lose players that they have budgeted this season for and paid for? Let's not forget that it's not just wages, a player's value is amortised over their contract.Only if you can't read. Nothing will be extended automatically (nor is that possible from a legal POV).
CorrectSo some clubs will have players who they have paid for this season up until June but cannot afford to pay any further, or the player quite within their legal rights has decided that they do not wish to return beyond their contract end in June.
Those teams will be without those players now for the rest of the season? What a shambles.
I'm not saying this is a great idea or anything, let's get that out of the way first. It's a legal minefield from a contractual law POV.Any thoughts on a solution for team who unavoidably lose players that they have budgeted this season for and paid for? Let's not forget that it's not just wages, a player's value is amortised over their contract.
Exactly and there's a whole load of other reasons which we will be missing.I'm not saying this is a great idea or anything, let's get that out of the way first. It's a legal minefield from a contractual law POV.
If you leave +1 contracts out of the equation (options which can be exercised unilaterally), either the club and player agree to extend the contract till the end of 19/20 season (or beyond that), or they don't come to an agreement and lose said player. A contract is between the player and the club, UEFA has no say in it and as far as I see it's only a "recommendation" from them to extend contracts to the end date of the season, cannot be enforced legally of course.
Just like with any solution, you'd have a shitload of grey areas. What if a few players refuse to extend but all others do? Seems like a form of distortion of competition to me. What with players who've already signed contracts elsewhere, e.g. Ziyech to Chelsea? Do Chelsea get compensation? Will Ziyech extend for 3 months on the same conditions as his current contract with Ajax? Can players who refuse to extend sign with other clubs? I don't know either.
As you mentioned it can indeed be a legal nightmare, but at the moment we can only comment on the potential solutions they bring forward. If they want to play out the 19/20 season they have to do something about the contracts, obviously, so good that they're already thinking about this stuff. Voiding the season would no doubt be a complete legal nightmare as well by the way, so whichever option we eventually go for, it'll just be the lesser of two evils.
From a contractual and legal POV I'm very interested to see what will happen.
Well, I hope they have their ass covered if they void the season and don't take an "we'll see what the consequences are" approach because they're gonna be attacked with lawsuits as well in that scenario.Exactly and there's a whole load of other reasons which we will be missing.
The more they try to figure this out and iron it all out, the longer it's going to take and the more of an issue it will become. I can't see it being possible. It would require far too much goodwill in an industry where goodwill is rocking horse shite.
Hey bud! How are you and the missus holding up?Well, I hope they have their ass covered if they void the season and don't take an "we'll see what the consequences are" approach because they're gonna be attacked with lawsuits as well in that scenario.
I reckon that proposed £750m will end up being the cheapest and most practical option as it would be open to negotiation and could result in the lifting of the 3pm rules to ensure that TV companies have more access to future matches per season.Well, I hope they have their ass covered if they void the season and don't take an "we'll see what the consequences are" approach because they're gonna be attacked with lawsuits as well in that scenario.
And that is where the integrity argument that is so beloved of the dippers falls apart.Correct
Doing fine for now - since she's kinda in "healthcare" she's a bit more paranoia about it than me, but friends and family still healthy Hope the same goes for you?Hey bud! How are you and the missus holding up?
I have wondered about your post quite a bit recently. Not taking prize money into account (which seems to be the major factor the EPL wants to finish this season, IMO), how would it be possible for the league to get sued if they were unable to finish the season, and decided to void it (say, restart - no promotion/relegation - just to keep it simple)?
Wouldn't force majeure just about cover every single legal contract out there? I can't think of any court/judge who would rule in favor of a plaintiff because COVID-19 had the entire world on lockdown?
yes. Curtail the league. Pre season and transfer window. Start afresh when we can.Any thoughts on a solution for team who unavoidably lose players that they have budgeted this season for and paid for? Let's not forget that it's not just wages, a player's value is amortised over their contract.
this is the PL, the only thing that matters is money. You can be reassured that any decision made will have taken into account any legal issues and potential costs. the PL doesn’t care about anything else.Well, I hope they have their ass covered if they void the season and don't take an "we'll see what the consequences are" approach because they're gonna be attacked with lawsuits as well in that scenario.
Add in Clubs that just won't exist if this continues for an extended period.Correct
Simplistic and unrealistic view. What pre-season if players aren't allowed to train together? What transfers window if agents aren't allowed to meet in July or August, let alone players travelling internationally to get their medicals done and stuff?yes. Curtail the league. Pre season and transfer window. Start afresh when we can.
My suspicion is that is what all this is about, its about providing a defense for the contracts. They know clubs will come at them, but I think that might seem like a lesser evil right now, clubs will not want to be seen to go to court over COVID. I suspect the EFL/FA will try and assist any club with genuine issues.Doing fine for now - since she's kinda in "healthcare" she's a bit more paranoia about it than me, but friends and family still healthy Hope the same goes for you?
Obviously I don't know what's in the specific contracts so hard to tell who would sue in a "null and void" scenario. England is no civil law country so it'll probably be different from what we know here. Force majeure is implicitly included in contracts over here but parties still have to prove that they've done everything within their power (bonus pater familias) to execute their contractual obligations, which might be why they're at least making it look like they wanna finish the season. Still, I don't know whether the league as a whole works as a big contract or not. Do they have legal basis to just "cancel" a whole season (75% odd completed)? I don't know how exactly, but every side with a disadvantage based on a "null and void" decision will try everything possible to challenge that decision. That's why I said if they're gonna null and void, they should have a waterproof defense file (or at least be as sure as they can be).
the PL and the behaviour of Liverpool and spurms have eroded the goodwill. The focus is purely greed and money. the focus and thoughts of these organisations are purely selfish and self centred.Exactly and there's a whole load of other reasons which we will be missing.
The more they try to figure this out and iron it all out, the longer it's going to take and the more of an issue it will become. I can't see it being possible. It would require far too much goodwill in an industry where goodwill is rocking horse shite.
For gosake.Simplistic and unrealistic view. What pre-season if players aren't allowed to train together? What transfers window if agents aren't allowed to meet in July or August, let alone players travelling internationally to get their medicals done and stuff?
This is dictated by the governments and health experts, and we'll have to see what's the best option when it can be considered to play again.
A team literally sued another team over a dead player last year. I wouldn't hold my breath...My suspicion is that is what all this is about, its about providing a defense for the contracts. They know clubs will come at them, but I think that might seem like a lesser evil right now, clubs will not want to be seen to go to court over COVID. I suspect the EFL/FA will try and assist any club with genuine issues.
I think they will hold on until the last minute to see if it could be played out, but I think most people are planning for worst case scenarios.
Feck off.For gosake.
curtail the season. Pause all football activities.
When it’s safe to do so, then start with a pre season and transfer window - 6 weeks later start the season.
that’s both simplistic (for Liverpool fans), and realistic.
All good this side, bud. The missus is still also having to go in to work as she works with the kid whose parents are both doctors.Doing fine for now - since she's kinda in "healthcare" she's a bit more paranoia about it than me, but friends and family still healthy Hope the same goes for you?
Obviously I don't know what's in the specific contracts so hard to tell who would sue in a "null and void" scenario. England is no civil law country so it'll probably be different from what we know here. Force majeure is implicitly included in contracts over here but parties still have to prove that they've done everything within their power (bonus pater familias) to execute their contractual obligations, which might be why they're at least making it look like they wanna finish the season. Still, I don't know whether the league as a whole works as a big contract or not. Do they have legal basis to just "cancel" a whole season (75% odd completed)? I don't know how exactly, but every side with a disadvantage based on a "null and void" decision will try everything possible to challenge that decision. That's why I said if they're gonna null and void, they should have a waterproof defense file (or at least be as sure as they can be).
Nope, because by starting a fresh season they can also put in place the rules about how they can handle it if the second wave lands and affects it which will remove all the risk of legal challenges etc, the teams will be entering a new season with new rules that they’ve all agreed to in advance.The people that want to start a fresh miss one potentially crucial point. With the potential of a second wave next winter curtailing football once more, wouldn't it make more sense to finish this season when possible then worry about the next after as opposed to risking two voids on the spin?
Re-start this season?For gosake.
curtail the season. Pause all football activities.
When it’s safe to do so, then start with a pre season and transfer window - 6 weeks later start the season.
that’s both simplistic (for Liverpool fans), and realistic.
The problem is there may not be any TV money providers left after this nightmare. I have read people are closing their SKY accounts in droves, including myself, when this virus calms down a bit. They may well go under. This will also not be helped by an extremely unsupportive government & populace, who will want something done about these overpaid prima donnas.The only thing that is driving the Premier League to finish the current season is the huge refund of TV money. If there is an amicable solution to the problem, both parties win. If the Premier League push for a premature restart of football, they'll be only making more people angry. I am sure they are aware of it.