I do have sympathy for the clubs who are being "bullied" into a decision. On the other hand, the clubs who are objecting to playing at neutral venues aren't doing it for any reason other than their own interests. Home advantage would count for very little if games are being played without supporters anyway. If the PL decided to give upon the neutral venue idea, these same clubs would then just object to playing behind closed doors at all, using the same argument of losing out on proper home advantage. They will obviously disagree with any idea if they think doing so could help them avoid an unfavourable league position. The standoff cannot continue for months, so if clubs need to be pressured into a decision, then so be it. Nothing is going to be 100% equally fair on everyone, so some teams are just going to have to deal with it. My Scottish team, Falkirk, were only 1 point off the lead with a +20 goal difference with 8 games to go, but they have awarded the League title to Raith. Is that fair? No. Nothing was going to be completely fair in this unprecedented situation though. Some teams are going to have to take the hit worse than others. Whether that's Villa, Liverpool or whoever. A definitive decision needs to be made so the game can move forward and, tough luck to whoever feels hard done by.