Deery
Dreary
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,590
Must have been about 3 phases of play behind
He affected play directly.Must have been about 3 phases of play behind
Richarlison.Who was offside there?
Even if he doesn't if he influences the play he's off.Your man coming back from offside didn't touch the ball, did he? Or does he not have to?
Richard ArlisonWho was offside there?
Correct, just seen it there nowRicharlison.
That’s not what I said thoughHe affected play directly.
Better for football to spend time drawing lines and have less goals.Another VAR disallowed goal for offside. There has been quite a few at this WC. In WC’s gone by they probably would have stood.
Richarlison was coming from a offside position and played a part in that goal.How was that offside... baffling
bullshit call
Yeah I'd forgotten that somehow. ThanksEven if he doesn't if he influences the play he's off.
Of course it is. Don't see what the fuss is aboutI mean that is definitely the right decision tbh. Richarlison was miles offside when the ball was played too him
He was miles offside and immediately competed for the ball. About as blatant an offside as you’ll ever see. Pre-var play would’ve been stopped ages before and there’d be no “goal” controversy.Absolute bullshit.