dinostar77
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 5,394
Maybe bayern can be convinced to part with gravenbech if the offer was big enough.
I’d prioritise a DLP but I think someone like FDJ (as an example) actually does/could perform both those functions lacking in our team. Being mobile, box to box & press resistant next to Casemiro & controlling the tempo of the match from deeper. It’s probably why EtH wants him so badly. Outside of Verratti (who’s too injury prone), I’d be lying if I said I watched enough football away from United to put forward names of midfielders of a similar mould.Personally I feel we need both,however if we can only sign one this summer which is it
Like who then?Someone like Caicedo who could partner Casa in the big games,whereas playmaker is people like De Jong (obviously not him)
I prefer pizza to riceThere was a TIFO IR L episode on youtube where they used a stats based pizza chart to show the strengths of erikson and casemiro. Then they overlayed frenkie stats on the combined pizza chart and you had the perfect midfield in terms of all of the strengths required by your midfield trio combined.
We arent going to get rice, just too expensive.
Agreed. Been saying this for some time. Many fans get stuck on the hype of caicedo or rice without understanding that they are freaking expensive and they were brought into the league when cheap. This summer, we have the opportunity to buy players of similar ilk for really cheap. We don't need to spend 100m on Declan rice to compete. We can spend 20 or 30m on a player with all the base skills and they will have the impact of the 100m player.If we were competent in moving players on we could have both as there’s players like Le Fee out there that could be gradually built up to be that playmaker and only has a year left on his contract so probably available for £15-£20 million which could be offset by moving VDB on.
There’s players like Rice and Caicedo out there that are pretty certain to be available this summer and we could offset a good chunk of their fees by moving McTominay and Fred both on.
Of course I’m only being hypothetical but if we brought in Le Fee and one of Rice or Caicedo and moved on McTominay, Fred and VDB you’re fixing pretty much all problems in midfield with Casemiro and Eriksen already there then Rabiot on a free who can play pretty much both roles.
Our other problem is though that we have a revolving door of managers over the past decade who all played differently so the players don’t fit the new manager coming in each time, it’s clear what ETH wants to do but is hamstrung by deadwood that we can’t seem to shift in order to facilitate it.
We're not going to compete by cheaping out on the midfield, I'm in agreement that there's opportunity to get good value but we also need guaranteed quality that excels in the Premier League, if we want to close the gap on Man City. Over the last decade the club's spunked too much money on gambles that haven't proven themselves at the top level, something that SAF valued greatly.Agreed. Been saying this for some time. Many fans get stuck on the hype of caicedo or rice without understanding that they are freaking expensive and they were brought into the league when cheap. This summer, we have the opportunity to buy players of similar ilk for really cheap. We don't need to spend 100m on Declan rice to compete. We can spend 20 or 30m on a player with all the base skills and they will have the impact of the 100m player.
Alan varela/Tijjani Reijnders (15m)
Enzo le fee/Andre (20m)
40m can sort out our midfield for the next 10 years. Midfield is the position with the most options. Striker and GK will cost us the most
Another big myth right here that is repeated over and over again. How much we spend on a player has no bearing on whether they will be quality for us. Even if we blow that 100m on Declan rice, he could still flop for us...Incase you are doubting, consider the fact that we have already done this before. We blew 100m for Pogba and it ended up bad. We blew big money on Fred and where is he. We blew 80m on Maguire....I could go on and on.We're not going to compete by cheaping out on the midfield, I'm in agreement that there's opportunity to get good value but we also need guaranteed quality that excels in the Premier League, if we want to close the gap on Man City. Over the last decade the club's spunked too much money on gambles that haven't proven themselves at the top level, something that SAF valued greatly.
No, the point is that we currently need quality players that have proven themselves, like Casemiro and Varane for example, if we want to compete against Man City. I love the idea of finding value we should be all over it, but when it comes to such an important position we can't be solely chancing it on players that haven't established themselves at the top level yet, and unfortunately proven, top players tend to cost a chunk of money. I agree Rice is out of question at the current price but somewhere in the £50-£80 million range is possible with the right outgoings.Another big myth right here that is repeated over and over again. How much we spend on a player has no bearing on whether they will be quality for us. Even if we blow that 100m on Declan rice, he could still flop for us...Incase you are doubting, consider the fact that we have already done this before. We blew 100m for Pogba and it ended up bad. We blew big money on Fred and where is he. We blew 80m on Maguire....I could go on and on.
There are cheap options who have the same probability of success at manutd as those expensive players you desire. It's better to go for the cheap options especially if the probability is roughly the same.
Besides all this, the most important thing is funds. We don't have funds to blow on a 100m midfielder...we just don't. Hate it or love it, accept it or ignore it, we don't have the funds until we get the glazers out.
That is the hard reality of manutd today. If we don't have the funds, it's a no brainer to buy the cheap options
Agree a lot with the first paragraph. Part of the problem is our current back up options who hav ebeen regular starters until this season are so poor passing the ball an dhave been for years. We have see Casemeiro can be a play maker to a degree this season and Eriksen is supposed to be a playmaker as is Fernandes and all of them have looked decent as a unit agains lesser teams, but havent had the composure or legs especially defensively....McFred at times were ot bad at carryign the ball but it wasnt profressive of with intelligence and little end product either.Better progressive passers of the ball than Fred and McTominay would be a start. Generally, we're fine with our present midfielders when playing Casemiro and Erikson against lesser opposition. The problem arises against the better teams. Erikson is a fine progressive passer but not a great mover or defensively minded which leaves the defence and Casemiro exposed. A purchase of a player more defensively astute and has passing range could help in tough away games also giving stronger depth to the squad.
EtH should play with just 2 forwards in away games where it's obvious we will be under pressure (Rashford and a new striker should be adequate). He's been too bold and open against the better teams this season. Stop playing Antony and Sancho.
There were like 4 Croations near the Brazilian box, with Case was all the way even behind the ref. I don't think he was there as a DM when his team was leading with a few minutes to go.thats incorrect Fred bombing forward to croatia touch line chasing a 50/50 ball he lost, cost them. Casemiro then had to step forward to kill the counter and once it was by him it was game over. But i would blame Fred on that one as he was brought on to close up shop and be defensively disruptive and not chase another goal.
Yeah. I don't know the deal. I don't think we're the only Club in the world that could offer him that, if true.He actually started doing it a lot in his last season at madrid. Kroos and Modric would sit at times and Casemiro would be the one bombing forward.
I think this is why he wanted to come to us, he wanted to be at a team where he could be much more involved and he saw a big hole in our team that he wanted to fill, funny how he was never linked to any other club.
Our press resistance and dribbling in midfield might be the worst I can think of in Europe top-ish teams, even fecking Spurs have Bentancur. You can't be a possession team without it which is why both CMs we buy hopefully will have this ability.A deep playmaker who is press resistant and can move with the ball. We have no dribblers in midfield
Honestly, Even that 60m to 80m you speak about is very high and is money we don't have. If the rumours are true, of us having roughly 100m to spend, it means we will only buy one or two players at such costs.No, the point is that we currently need quality players that have proven themselves, like Casemiro and Varane for example, if we want to compete against Man City. I love the idea of finding value we should be all over it, but when it comes to such an important position we can't be solely chancing it on players that haven't established themselves at the top level yet, and unfortunately proven, top players tend to cost a chunk of money. I agree Rice is out of question at the current price but somewhere in the £50-£80 million range is possible with the right outgoings.
I consider going big on Fred, Maguire and Antony as examples of us signing players at a high price that haven't proven themselves at the top level, so they don't fit the criteria.
How much do you think an 18 year old Rooney would go for in today's market? About 80 million at the very least. If Rooney was ripping it up for Everton and England right now, with us in need for a striker and Man City dominating the league, by your logic you would deem that opportunity too expensive and go for a cheaper alternative instead?Honestly, Even that 60m to 80m you speak about is very high and is money we don't have. If the rumours are true, of us having roughly 100m to spend, it means we will only buy one or two players at such costs.
Even if we sale players...if we are buying new players at those prices, we will buy 2 or 3 players tops. This reckless spending is exactly what has got us here. Furthermore, there is zero correlation between price of the player and their success at manutd. Given the lack of guarantees, it's a no brainer that we ought to spend wisely on the cheap high potential players. Being cheap doesn't mean they are not quality.
We keep blowing huge money on relatively average players or old players. If we are properly run, we need to go all in on the buy cheap make superstar strategy.
Crazy enough, We used to do that alot with Ferguson. Majority of the squad was cheap and then the sprinkle on top would be pricey. Evra, vidic, van DER sar were all cheap. Ferdinand was pricey. Ronaldo, nani, Anderson were cheap. Rooney was pricey etc. This isn't new to us. We just stopped practicing it and went into some crazy galactico mindset which has never been the soul of manutd
We need carriers of the ball. It's the clearest weakness in the entire midfield. None of them can dribble for more than 2 seconds and are all crap when under pressure on the ball if they don't have a passing option.We need both. We need midfielders who are going to elevate our play in the build up phase.
It's absolutely vital to sign midfielders who are deep lying playmakers or deep lying pressure evaders or a deep roaming playmaker.
The solution is required in the deeper area of midfield.
A ball carrier can definitely enhance the play style as long as he also has the craft and guile on the ball to create plays or openings. But United's biggest problem in the last 10 years is that we can't play the game in the opponent's half. And if you can't sustain attacks in the opponent's half, you won't score a lot of goals in a EPL that is littered with teams in the top half who are adept at pressing high.We need carriers of the ball. It's the clearest weakness in the entire midfield. None of them can dribble for more than 2 seconds and are all crap when under pressure on the ball if they don't have a passing option.
Did you understand the whole comment or you read it half way. We used to buy a lot of players cheap and would only splash on one or two player. I gave you examples of how we did it for our defense and our attack then. Somehow, you chose to focus on the expensive players without understanding the underlying principle.How much do you think an 18 year old Rooney would go for in today's market? About 80 million at the very least. If Rooney was ripping it up for Everton and England right now, with us in need for a striker and Man City dominating the league, by your logic you would deem that opportunity too expensive and go for a cheaper alternative instead?
You're completely missing the point I'm trying to make.Did you understand the whole comment or you read it half way. We used to buy a lot of players cheap and would only splash on one or two player. I gave you examples of how we did it for our defense and our attack then. Somehow, you chose to focus on the expensive players without understanding the underlying principle.
Why are you using Rooney as the example and not Ronaldo. Because Ronaldo shows that you can buy quality players cheaply as long as they fit the profile.
We can not afford to buy all our players at those high prices of 80m. In a summer where we are super broke, and we probably need 2 midfielders, a CB, a GK and 2 strikers, we cannot buy all of them at 60m or 80m. Do you understand the underlying principle or you are just talking of imaginary money on FIFA. How hard is this to understand
This is what I'm disagreeing with, if you want proven quality, which is what we need to compete against Man City, you have to heavily invest in top players alongside buying the cheaper but more riskier purchases. I used Rooney as an example of us having to pay heavily for guaranteed Premier League quality. I could list all the relatively cheap transfers in the last decade that have flopped to counter your point and support mine.40m can sort out our midfield for the next 10 years.
Have a feeling he'll stay at La Real if they qualify for champions league. I think Arsenal are strongly linked as well.Zubimendi is a mobile player who can carry the ball and also has good defensive attributes. Could be a very good partner for Casemiro but is strongly linked with Barcelona for around 50 million pounds. The best players don't have to hundreds of millions worth. We just have to look in the right areas like we did with Bruno.
Customary video:
He's one of the best in the world but is he realistic?No love for Barella ?
Yeah would be great to sign Rabiot,Caicedo/Rice and someone with a similar profile to Le FeeIf we were competent in moving players on we could have both as there’s players like Le Fee out there that could be gradually built up to be that playmaker and only has a year left on his contract so probably available for £15-£20 million which could be offset by moving VDB on.
There’s players like Rice and Caicedo out there that are pretty certain to be available this summer and we could offset a good chunk of their fees by moving McTominay and Fred both on.
Of course I’m only being hypothetical but if we brought in Le Fee and one of Rice or Caicedo and moved on McTominay, Fred and VDB you’re fixing pretty much all problems in midfield with Casemiro and Eriksen already there then Rabiot on a free who can play pretty much both roles.
Our other problem is though that we have a revolving door of managers over the past decade who all played differently so the players don’t fit the new manager coming in each time, it’s clear what ETH wants to do but is hamstrung by deadwood that we can’t seem to shift in order to facilitate it.
Yeah you wouldn't think it's too much to ask but we don't seem to have found one yetJust a central midfielder whose main game is to retain the ball, pass the ball well in the first and middle third of the pitch, and is pretty good under the press. Mobility and ball carrying is a strong plus too.
Don’t think I’m asking for much there