Did we waste €200 million this summer?

Captmfla

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2023
Messages
98
It's a good window because you get Hojlund, great striker with high potential and Onana, one of the best keepers around.

I’m watching Kudus destroy Brentford at the moment, and thinking how he was nearly half the price of Mount. Comfortably a better player, and a better player than Bruno too for my money.
In the end, Brentford destroyed Kudus actually (based on the verb you used)
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
12,156
There is the argument that Levy would never, ever have sold Kane to another PL club, which I have no evidence to refute.

But IF 120m would have pried Harry loose from Daniel, that money would have been vastly better spent than the 200m Antony, Mount and Onana over the last two summers.
 

MetoTTT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Messages
2,547
Location
France
Hojlund is a excellent buy (maybe we've overpaid) but he could be a complete elite striker imo, Onana will do the job (replace aging Dave on massive wages was needed)...just can't get the Mount deal.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,450
Location
Croatia
One is responsible for us being out from CL, second is yet to score a goal in PL, third is injured since we signed him (and with questionable role in team) and fourth is downgrade to Fred.

I don't know what future brings but at this moment this window looks as complete debacle.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,034
One is responsible for us being out from CL, second is yet to score a goal in PL, third is injured since we signed him (and with questionable role in team) and fourth is downgrade to Fred.

I don't know what future brings but at this moment this window looks as complete debacle.
It's still early to judge all three of them.

Personally, I can see the logic in Onana. If he cuts out these clangers, he may end up being an upgrade on De Gea. We couldn't go on with a keeper who couldn't pass (or leave his goal-line).

Hjolund has got five in the CL and looks like he has all the tools. No worries about him at all.

Can see Mount being a solid squad player or a hard-working 8 if/when we get good again.

It's last year's signings that are going to screw us. Anthony was decent tonight but has been woeful over all, and Casemiro was just too old.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
11,500
Location
Texas
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
It was pretty obvious from the start of the window that it was going to be another directionless disaster.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
15,442
This idiot should think about joining the Tory government. He'd be excellent at pissing away money especially to his buddies.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,063
Idk

If possible with 200m I would have preferred us to sign a top class central midfielder and a really reliable quality striker.

Have no idea if they were available and wanted to come here so it is hard to say. Mount is a good player, Hojlund is a talent and Onana could turn it around.

A lot of ifs as Mount doesn't really have a space in the starting 11, Hojlund needs to come good and Onana needs to cut out the mistakes.

Basically I have not answered the question.
 

Kopral Jono

Full Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
3,352
One is responsible for us being out from CL, second is yet to score a goal in PL, third is injured since we signed him (and with questionable role in team) and fourth is downgrade to Fred.

I don't know what future brings but at this moment this window looks as complete debacle.
And it could have been one Harry Kane. I will never, ever get tired of saying this.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,031
If we’d kept De Gea and only signed Hojlund & Regulion on loan, we’d be better off this season.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
2,784
One is responsible for us being out from CL, second is yet to score a goal in PL, third is injured since we signed him (and with questionable role in team) and fourth is downgrade to Fred.

I don't know what future brings but at this moment this window looks as complete debacle.
This window looks like it will get the manager the sack !
 

AFC NimbleThumb

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
7,564
Instead of signing Kane, Utd pissed away £129m on the magnificent duo Antony and Onana

Fecking marvellous :rolleyes:
Because Kane can collect the ball off the goalkeeper, spray it to himself on the wing then get on the end of his own cross. . .

The fact people can rightly recognise we spunked away money on Antony but still act like Kane would cure the many ailments of this team astounds me.

Would we be better with Kane? Of course.

Would Kane cover up for some issues? Of course.

Are we a team in the right moment to sign a 30 y/o striker when we are years away from competency? No.

The squad needs a tear down & fans need to stop looking for a white knight to come in to save us.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,148
It does feel like we've have been better off doing what we did with Hojlund and just picking 2 more 20 year olds we rated at positions of actual need (a physical #8 and a CB) and grabbing a keeper on a loan or free like Nubel from Bayern.

Or even guys in their mid-20s but who fill holes in the outfield positions probably woulda worked better. Plug in I guess Matheus Nunes or Edson Alvarez in midfield and say Pau Torres, to pick some realistic names, and we're better off:

We'd be better off with this squad:

Hojlund/Martial
Antony/Diallo
Rashford/Garnacho
Bruno/Eriksen/Hannibal
Nunes/McTominay
Casemiro/Mainoo
Shaw/Reguilon (Malacia)
Dalot/AWB
Maguire/Varane
Lisandro/Pau Torres/Lindelof
Loan Keeper/Bayindir

I don't think we'd be a ton better, but we'd be in a better situation going forward, just needing to replace Martial, Varane and Casemiro and find a keeper, instead of needing 2 midfielders, replacements for Varane and Martial.

Basically it was weird we bought Mount without selling Bruno for 80M and using that money elsewhere. There's no real evidence that Mount and Bruno could play together based on either's career, and we have other needs. If we were moving to 3 at the back than buying Mount would have made more sense, but we aren't, so it didn't.