Hopefully that trend continues. I’d hope nothing like what I heard 15 years ago in Victoria park student area happens now. We were walking in a group and a police van was patrolling - we assumed that because of the reported rape in the area it was because of that.
Seeing as he’s being dragged over the coals for being a creepy pervert you’d think someone would suggest to him that maybe he should fasten one more button on that shirt?
That’s why he’s in this mess
Proper crackpot levels. It’s scary though how these articulate, confident people can brainwash the masses of morons.
"Follow, me on rumble, please, to stay free, plus its my only remaining revenue stream, but that's definitely not the reason, freedom.
So true. I just uploaded this video to YouTube for free without any censorship but the other place where I did the same will still pay me.I mean, he’s right about a lot of the things government and media are trying to do to control the narrative - but what that’s got to do with allegations against him of rape and sexual assault I have no idea!
Brand - A Right Charmer
Like?
The online safety bill has been widely criticised - how valid the concerns are I don’t know.
Look, if you want to know what's really going on with the global elite, big pharma, George Soros, and the plandemic, all you need to do subscribe to Russell's rumble account for $5 a month.
I must be missing something. It seems like the example you give of him being right is something you admit you don't even know is valid.
I like how you're always there to hand it to the worst people.
The online safety bill is holding social media companies to account when they host hate material that could influence kids etc. (at least that's my interpretation of it). How does that relate to Brand and the rape claims?
Eh?
My original post stated that I have no idea what that has to do with the accusations against him. I also called it manipulation.
Is that what happened or is it just what Brand is claiming happened?
Believe his YouTube demonetization was made by the company, which is of course American. So not sure what he’s alluding to.
Im not totally certain - but Rumble seem to have said they did receive ‘questions’ from the UK government about whether Brand was able to monetise his content. Same with TikTok.
Yeah I've had a read and they said a select committee sent them a letter asking them some questions about his ability to monetise. It's not exactly the same thing but I'm not sure it's something I'd be happy about government reps getting involved in.
I thought they made it pretty clear that is what happened
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Every platform has some standards. In Rumble’s case, they are obviously much broader but even they have limits to what people can post, which is why the free speech argument is a bit disingenuous.
Ironic, seeing as comedians who get pulled over the targets of their jokes often hide behind the 'it's not real, I just say stuff to make people laugh' defence. If they can get away with that when they're denigrating trans people, surely other comedians can pull the same trick when they're aiming thinly disguised criticisms at dodgy cnuts?
Presumably because you can’t be charged with slander for making generalised jokes about trans people?
So much for that freedom of speech that Brand's new following also keep dribbling about.
Exactly.
Exactly my point. You're just much more concise! Feels like standup is one of the few places where the limits to free speech can be tested. I mean, didn't Hannibal Buress basically out Cosby?
It further shows what Brand really is. The fact he's trying to silence people even talking about the subject, especially stand ups/comedians, shows more than anything else why this isn't a fireless smoke situation.
