England Discussion

Shimo

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,082
Don't think it really matters who got picked on the fringes, It's not like he has the tactical capacity to affect games with his management / substitutions. Southgate has his favorites and will play them. They should be able to get out of the group stages but, after that, if he comes up against any competent manager/team, they will be done.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,957
Location
Editing my own posts.
Can anyone think of an era where England have had worse options at CM? (not attacking mid). Hard to stake a claim for anyone else except maybe JWP.
Yeah CM looks particularly poor. Bellingham aside, even his stalwarts who looked good at the Euros are either older or in worse form.

It’s odd to have gone from “one of the best squads at the Euros” to thinking virtually the same squad looks poor barely a year later….A lot of people haven’t kicked on and Southgate’s stock is way down.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,218
What madness is this? Why wouldn't you pick one of our best players from the Euros in a 26 man squad? Particularly in a position where the competition is so limited.
Maybe because he's not fit and has played about 30 mins so far this season.

Would have been better off picking Milner.
 

GifLord

Better at GIFs than posts
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
22,898
Location
LALALAND
What madness is this? Why wouldn't you pick one of our best players from the Euros in a 26 man squad? Particularly in a position where the competition is so limited.
56minutes played all season. Same thing as with Hazard barely played 25 games in the last 3 seasons and gets picked. Purely based on Reputation :lol:
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,268
I... don't agree with this at all. I think it's one of the best squads in the tournament. I don't trust Southgate to maximise that talent but the front 6 is really as good as anyone's.
I don't agree with it at all. As I said, in forward selection there is some talent but rest is just poor or average looking from international perspective.

Is it?! Of course, there are weaknesses but overall this has to be one of the stongest teams in the world on paper. Top striker and wingers, midfield full of players that play week-in-week-out at the top level, and a few marquee players in defence. Nothing really wrong with the team at all. The only downside is that they're all English
Don't agree at all, as I wrote to poster above. Central midfield is just poor and drop from Scholes-, Lampard-, Gerrard-level is just enormous. I would say that player like Nicky Butt or Gareth Barry would go into this lineup without any trouble. Playing week in and week out doesn't mean anything if you are not good enough. Rice and Bellingham are overated by miles when playing aganst quality players. Centerbacks are just slow with no pace at all. There will be 3 centerbacks in starting lineup and that is not because they are good. Fullbacks aren't good enough defenders looking internationally.
 

Hoof the ball

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
12,297
Location
San Antonio, Texas.
Southgate has a real boner for anyone so long as they play in the PL. They don't even need to play well; just play in the PL. That's it.

The inclusion of Gallagher is atrocious. On current form and current reputation, if he played for Napoli or Valencia, he wouldn't get a look in, but because he's in the PL and at Chelsea, it happens. If Tomori or Smalling played for Bournemouth and Everton, it wouldn't even be a debate if they'd be included, but apparently playing for Serie A winners isn't sufficient enough. Granted Abraham hasn't been at the races so far this season, but where was his inclusion last season when he was red hot for Roma? Exactly. Southgate doesn't even try to hide it. He'll prioritise PL players in worse form than non-PL players in better form. Hell, it took fecking Bellingham playing out of his skin long enough at Dortmund to get Southgate to turn his head.

Absolute turnip.
 

ThierryHenry

wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
13,717
Location
London Town
56minutes played all season. Same thing as with Hazard barely played 25 games in the last 3 seasons and gets picked. Purely based on Reputation :lol:
Maybe because he's not fit and has played about 30 mins so far this season.

Would have been better off picking Milner.
I just don't agree with this at all. It's international football in a tournament with effectively no warm up. More than ever, you need to pick players who understand your system and have proven that they can do well in that set-up. If Phillips isn't fit enough, he won't play, and I'd still be happy with taking that risk in a 26 man squad.

It goes back to the Klose/ Podolski Germany teams. They fit perfectly in those roles, the manager trusted them, and so they kept getting selected even when not playing for their clubs. That seems smart to me.
 

Trequarista10

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2020
Messages
2,542
Southgate has a real boner for anyone so long as they play in the PL. They don't even need to play well; just play in the PL. That's it.

The inclusion of Gallagher is atrocious. On current form and current reputation, if he played for Napoli or Valencia, he wouldn't get a look in, but because he's in the PL and at Chelsea, it happens. If Tomori or Smalling played for Bournemouth and Everton, it wouldn't even be a debate if they'd be included, but apparently playing for Serie A winners isn't sufficient enough. Granted Abraham hasn't been at the races so far this season, but where was his inclusion last season when he was red hot for Roma? Exactly. Southgate doesn't even try to hide it. He'll prioritise PL players in worse form than non-PL players in better form. Hell, it took fecking Bellingham playing out of his skin long enough at Dortmund to get Southgate to turn his head.

Absolute turnip.
He dropped Smalling when he was first choice at United, don't think he'd pick him if he played for Bournemouth or Everton. You may have a point on Tomori though. I'd pick him over Maguire and Coady. Abraham is one of a number of forwards who missed out so don't think it's to do with being in the PL or not, he's just similiar level. Overall sample size isn't really big enough to say if it's a factor, and if it is a factor how much so or how much its worth criticising, because there simply isn't enough English players playing abroad. Even with Tomori, there's also Guehi, Tarkowski, Burn, Mings etc in the PL not getting picked either. He picked Trippier, Bellingham, Sancho etc when playing abroad. In fact Sancho has fallen out of favour since moving to the PL, and Bellingham was called up when only 17 which showed a lot of faith from Southgate.
 

Rayman96

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
1,327
Location
Glasgow
Supports
Also supports Rangers
A lot of talk here about how this is the worst CM ever.
While I agree you dont have strength in depth, Rice and Bellingham would both cost £100m each. Not many, if any other squads could say that.
I think the problem is the defence and you will play 3 at the back to try and compensate which will leave the midfield short.
Not sure he needed to take 8 forwards.
 

Steven Seagull

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
9,207
Location
The Clockwork Orange tulip technician.
Southgate has a real boner for anyone so long as they play in the PL. They don't even need to play well; just play in the PL. That's it.

The inclusion of Gallagher is atrocious. On current form and current reputation, if he played for Napoli or Valencia, he wouldn't get a look in, but because he's in the PL and at Chelsea, it happens. If Tomori or Smalling played for Bournemouth and Everton, it wouldn't even be a debate if they'd be included, but apparently playing for Serie A winners isn't sufficient enough. Granted Abraham hasn't been at the races so far this season, but where was his inclusion last season when he was red hot for Roma? Exactly. Southgate doesn't even try to hide it. He'll prioritise PL players in worse form than non-PL players in better form. Hell, it took fecking Bellingham playing out of his skin long enough at Dortmund to get Southgate to turn his head.

Absolute turnip.
name your 26
 

Marcelinho87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
7,232
Location
Barnsley
A lot of talk here about how this is the worst CM ever.
While I agree you dont have strength in depth, Rice and Bellingham would both cost £100m each. Not many, if any other squads could say that.
I think the problem is the defence and you will play 3 at the back to try and compensate which will leave the midfield short.
Not sure he needed to take 8 forwards.
They wouldn't cost £100m if they weren't English imo.
 

GifLord

Better at GIFs than posts
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
22,898
Location
LALALAND
I just don't agree with this at all. It's international football in a tournament with effectively no warm up. More than ever, you need to pick players who understand your system and have proven that they can do well in that set-up. If Phillips isn't fit enough, he won't play, and I'd still be happy with taking that risk in a 26 man squad.

It goes back to the Klose/ Podolski Germany teams. They fit perfectly in those roles, the manager trusted them, and so they kept getting selected even when not playing for their clubs. That seems smart to me.
Those 2 players actually played for their clubs. Klose at 37/38 played 30 games for Lazio and had 8g/8a.
Playing 56min in 3months and a half and then getting picked up is fecking embarassing no matter how you put it.
In all of 2022 he played less than 700minutes = 7.7 games
He plays for a club that goes all the way in almost every competition yet barely plays for them and then even gets rewarded by being called up to the NT for the WC. It's like we're living in some sort of a bizarro world.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,218
I just don't agree with this at all. It's international football in a tournament with effectively no warm up. More than ever, you need to pick players who understand your system and have proven that they can do well in that set-up. If Phillips isn't fit enough, he won't play, and I'd still be happy with taking that risk in a 26 man squad.

It goes back to the Klose/ Podolski Germany teams. They fit perfectly in those roles, the manager trusted them, and so they kept getting selected even when not playing for their clubs. That seems smart to me.
Those players were fit and ready to play.

There's literally no point in bringing a player to any tournament who is not fit and able to play if needed.
 

LouieVanGallsRedArmeh

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
68
Well Iam absolutely not schocked at all that Sancho PepsiCola and neither Lingard are in the WC squad, but why the hell is Harry in there, that is absolutely mind boggling, same goes for Sterling. Such a weird selection of players. At least England has the easiest group, should go through even with this bizzare bunch
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,069
Ben White is in.

Smalling he obviously doesn't like, Tomori I think he's also just not convinced by for whatever reason (and hasn't had the push like Maddison has to pick him) and Dan Burn I don't ever really had a chance (and if he did it would be as LB).

Dier is terrible, even worse then Maguire for my money, but Southgate likes him.
Dan burn would have been the perfect option for left centre back in the usual back 3 southgate goes for, burn has played there for brighton
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,248
Hope we lose all our games and the whole of England lose all interest in the shitty world cup
 

Gringo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
3,402
Supports
Portugal
Dan burn would have been the perfect option for left centre back in the usual back 3 southgate goes for, burn has played there for brighton
Dan Burn has been incredible for 18 months at least. I can't believe he hasn't got a cap yet.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
Location
Not Moskva
Good to see Maddison in the squad although he might be the WC equivalent of Grealish at the Euros. That elusive missing piece always out of reach.

it’s easy to analyse weaknesses as we are more familiar with the players (central defence particularly) but I don’t know which countries have true strength in all areas. Our progress will probably depend on penalty shoot outs as I see this side as low scoring, low conceding.
 

Bluelion7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Messages
1,192
Supports
Chelsea
Maybe I’m biased because as a Chelsea fan (although … I wouldn’t have picked Gallagher … so..), but how many of Englands current CBs have MotM awards in the CL knockout rounds on their CV’s? Chalobah has been playing really well in general, especially considering all of our CB’s have had to deal with NO DM cover. I looked it ups d apparently he was the second fastest player on the Chelsea squad behind only “Turbo Tino”, and his distribution isn’t bad.

In addition, if you take Ben White (good call) AND you are probably going to try for a back 3 … in addition to adding pace, wouldn’t you want someone who actually played the left side of a back 3? Maguire or Stine would be middle, White would be right side. Stones lack of speed would get exposed on left. Walker is coming off injury and doesn’t play left. Dier is … limited and wouldn’t play left.

Tomori would have been the obvious option, but Chalobah has been better than him, this year certainly. And neither get a look in.

And if I were taking a Chelsea CM it would have been RLC, not Conor. In this international matches everything is super tight, and one or two careless passes could be the only gap a team gets. Conor is good for 5 of those a half. He IS exciting, but exciting and careless players are not built for tourneys like the WC.

RLC (not a great option either …. Does no one over there want to be a mid?) would at least give you a mid over 5’8” who isn’t a walking statue (looking at you KP). He has grown pretty reliable at carry the ball forward and linking play. And when he hasn’t had to play RWB he’s been pretty good .

If you’re going to go so defensive that you start Rice in front of a back 3 … why could t you try playing both Mount and Foden. Mount CAN play deeper, scrap and press. So can Maddison for that matter

It would seem to matter less to Southgate about position changed considering a lot of these players aren’t playing regularly AT ALL for their teams.

Southgate seems so awful …
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,015
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Southgate will waste the talents of this squad.
 

RedDevilRoshi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2017
Messages
13,269
I take it Sterling is only in the squad because he’s been part of waistcoats previous squads?
 

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
56minutes played all season. Same thing as with Hazard barely played 25 games in the last 3 seasons and gets picked. Purely based on Reputation :lol:
Martinez is an equally shite manager to Southgate. I love Hazard but he may as well retire at this point.
A lot of talk here about how this is the worst CM ever.
While I agree you dont have strength in depth, Rice and Bellingham would both cost £100m each. Not many, if any other squads could say that.
I think the problem is the defence and you will play 3 at the back to try and compensate which will leave the midfield short.
Not sure he needed to take 8 forwards.
2 decent midfielders is not enough for a tournament. Philips is not only not international level but is unfit. Gallagher and Mount are not a CMs. We are so weak in this position it’s ridiculous.
Our CB’s are also complete dogshit. But I do not have much fault for Southgate, there really isn’t much choice.
In terms of Forwards, they name Maddison and Foden in there and they are 10’s not forwards. The wide players are truly some of the most inconsistent in the World. It’s hard to tell if he has made the right choice.
Again, are players are poor, the manager is poor. This team will be knocked out the moment it leaves the group.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
Location
Not Moskva
Martinez is an equally shite manager to Southgate. I love Hazard but he may as well retire at this point.

2 decent midfielders is not enough for a tournament. Philips is not only not international level but is unfit. Gallagher and Mount are not a CMs. We are so weak in this position it’s ridiculous.
Our CB’s are also complete dogshit. But I do not have much fault for Southgate, there really isn’t much choice.
In terms of Forwards, they name Maddison and Foden in there and they are 10’s not forwards. The wide players are truly some of the most inconsistent in the World. It’s hard to tell if he has made the right choice.
Again, are players are poor, the manager is poor. This team will be knocked out the moment it leaves the group.
England will not be playing Real Madrid or Man City. They’ll be playing another international side with glaring weaknesses.
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
What madness is this? Why wouldn't you pick one of our best players from the Euros in a 26 man squad? Particularly in a position where the competition is so limited.
Irrelevant - he has had about a total of 30 minutes of football this season. He wasn't even very good last season.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
He should 100% be in the team, especially over someone like Coady, but the starting CBs are like the few players who do really well under Southgate. Walker, Stones, and Maguire have all done pretty well at the WC and the Euros under him.
Yeah he's never fancied Tomori at all,like you say it always looked likely he would go with his trusted lieutenants there. Feel for JWP who has missed out on last three tournaments and would have offered real set piece threat. Just remember how effective we were on those in last World Cup.
 

Bluelion7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Messages
1,192
Supports
Chelsea
Pickford
White Stones Maguire Shaw
Rice
Saka Maddison Bellingham Rashford
Kane​
You get your pace from Saka in this. Foden has to take either Maddison or Rashford’s spot. Foden is one of the best creative forces in all of football right now.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
England and US are in the same group.....and i think both managers made some really odd choices for their squads

England's midfield has zero creative players and how do you select Phillips who hasn't played in months until just yesterday or day before? Gallagher has been poor for Chelsea

CB pairing, much like the US, is going to be an area of honest weakness. Maguire isn't a regular at United and he shouldn't be in the squad for England based on merit. He and Stones together is going to be an issue.

How do you NOT select two left footed LB's? i mean that's a bit fuking mental if you ask me.
England's midfield has had very little creativity for years,probably have to go all the way back to golden generation with Scholesy
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
Glad Maddison and Wilson are in but for others:
  • Phillips has 3 sub appearance all season, JWP should be there instead.
  • Gallagher has been more miss than hit this season but there is a struggle in that area.
  • No Tomori who plays regularly in the UCL and has been great but we have Coady instead and Maguire has hardly played.
  • Would have liked Toney but if England are only playing 1 striker its difficult to get everyone in.
Ruled Toney out when didn't get on pitch in either of those two Nations League games
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,594
Location
Birmingham
You get your pace from Saka in this. Foden has to take either Maddison or Rashford’s spot. Foden is one of the best creative forces in all of football right now.
First of all, you get much more than just 'pace' from Saka, who funnily enough has created more than Foden this season, averaging 2 key passes per game to Foden's 1.4. He has also made 6 assists to Foden's 3. Maddison comes out on to in comparison to Foden who, according to you is ''one of the best creative forces in all of football right now''.
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,602
I think Chalobah should have been given a chance, to be honest.

Maguire shouldn't be in the team.

Phillips? How the hell is he in the squad. Literally getting in based on being at City and being one of Southgate's chums.
Because Phillips is essential to Southgates mind numbing approach to midfield so he brings him along despite only having one working shoulder.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
When I watched Southgate's interview on SSN earlier there was a distinct impression he only picked Toney for Nations League games due to combination of peer pressure and Wilson injury.

Tomori may well get a proper look in once Southgate leaves so hard as it is right now he just needs to bide his time.
 
Last edited: