Erling Haaland / signs for Dortmund

Status
Not open for further replies.

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
I don't see any problems regarding Martial. There will be plenty of games for both players and he'll also be able to cover the left if Rashford is injured or needs a rest. Signing Haaland should allow us to keep him fresh and hopefully that helps with his injuries.

I don't see him having any issues with it either. Ibra and Sanchez were established superstars brought in to take his position. Signing a youngster to compete with him is very different. He should take it as a show of faith that we're happy to go forward with him as our only experienced striker.

I really don't get this protectionism people have towards their favourite players. Martial is one of my favourites but its obvious a bit of compeition would help keep him on his toes. He has a tendency to slack off in smaller games. In a perfect world Haaland comes in a turns out good enough to take his place. If that happened we'd be in great shape.
 
Last edited:

Suv666

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
8,773
There's this weird cult around Martial on the internet which is very weird. A bit of competition is what the lad needs, He is very inconsistent and has not fulfilled his potential yet.
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,198
In my head, we'd look something like this (full-strength) until the summer:

------McTominay------Fred-------
James------Martial----------Rashford
------------------Haaland---------------

I know Martial's not a #10 but i see no reason why he couldn't do better there than Mata/Lingard/Pereira. If he can't, start one of those three and Martial/James/Rashford/Haaaland rotate based on fitness and form.


From the summer onwards, if we sign who we should sign, I'd hope:


---------McTominay-------CDM--------------------
-----------------------CAM/#10------------------------
James/Martial------Haaland---------Rashford


I think a big but technically decent CAF coul cause HAVOC bringing our fast wide forwards into play and knocking the ball onto them etc.
Haaland is not as good playing with his back to goal and bringing teammates into play though, so that really wouldn’t be a reason for displacing Martial with him. He offers a threat running in behind, is a big bundle of energy and is a predator in the box - something totally different.

Keep Martial away from the right wing.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,893
Location
England
Is he good aerially? Would be brilliant if he was, because it would give us a threat from crosses.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,370
Location
Flagg
We've also seen in games that an injury to Martial and our attacking play relies purely on Rashford. Vital we get another player in personally, if nothing else to reduce the pressure on our senior (crazy to think Martial and Rashford as this) attackers.
Yeah true but at least we have some kind of depth in attack. Greenwood has shown he can play in place of Rashford or Martial and at least allow the team to function.

You also have to factor in Haaland's age and experience. Highly unlikely he'll come in and be an immediate answer to anything.

Meanwhile we are literally 1 injury from having NO ONE as half of our midfield. I'd classify that as an emergency really.

Whilst I agree you can’t pass up an opportunity to sign a prospect like this for £20m. I don’t think midfield will be addressed until the summer so with Pogba back this month we can hopefully limp to the end of the season.
I think midfield is in a situation where waiting to sort it out just isn't an option. If you can't get a player in permanently in January, then you have to look for a temporary fix.

If we can do that and get this kid I wouldn't be complaining
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,661
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Only thing I'm concerned about is shoving Greenwood out on the right. He's been much better playing up top, and I don't see Martial or Haaland on the right either.

Depth wise with players in positions they have looked at the level we need, it'd end up like this...

LW - Rashford/Martial/James
ST - Martial/Haaland/Greenwood
RW - James

It would end up with Greenwood only getting minutes out on the right, which whilst he can play there, he hasn't looked half the player he has up top.
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
Yeah true but at least we have some kind of depth in attack. Greenwood has shown he can play in place of Rashford or Martial and at least allow the team to function.

You also have to factor in Haaland's age and experience. Highly unlikely he'll come in and be an immediate answer to anything.

Meanwhile we are literally 1 injury from having NO ONE as half of our midfield. I'd classify that as an emergency really.



I think midfield is in a situation where waiting to sort it out just isn't an option. If you can't get a player in permanently in January, then you have to look for a temporary fix.

If we can do that and get this kid I wouldn't be complaining
Midfield is definitely the more urgent signing. As you correctly point out we continue to be an injury from disaster as proved in the SU and Villa games without Scotty. Every time Fred or Scott go into a challenge I flinch these days.

It's not a choice between signing a striker or a midfielder in January though. They will likely have a list of targets they believe they can get over the next two windows including 2 midfielders. If any of those players are available in January I'd expect they will go for them. They'd probably sign all 3 in January if it was possible. But clubs are reluctant to sell mid season so unfortunately it might just be Haaland that's available.

I can't see Ole signing someone he's not sure about just to boost the numbers either. We've signed way too many problems over the last 7 years to sign another on a several year contract just to cover a few months. You'd hope there must be someone out there though who could come in on a loan or short contract though. All they have to do is be a better holding midfielder than Andreas and Matic. That's not exactly a lot to ask.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,491
I mostly think they come to him because he gets big moves with big wages done to be honest. You can just as well be sharp and bullish to achieve that as being nice. He's probably nice to the buying/interested clubs and as rough as possible with the selling ones
He more likely rough with those who try to screw his clients
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,074
Location
Canada
Only thing I'm concerned about is shoving Greenwood out on the right. He's been much better playing up top, and I don't see Martial or Haaland on the right either.

Depth wise with players in positions they have looked at the level we need, it'd end up like this...

LW - Rashford/Martial/James
ST - Martial/Haaland/Greenwood
RW - James

It would end up with Greenwood only getting minutes out on the right, which whilst he can play there, he hasn't looked half the player he has up top.
Dont think that's an issue. He's played almost exclusively on the right. Only times he does up top is in the dead rubber games (and vs spurs where he didnt make much of an impact). On the right is perfect for his development and he's impressed. Long term I expect to see him up top, and realistically if we sign haaland itll be a trio of those 2 and Rashford imo. Not a problem having depth till all are ready though, and someone like haaland is necessary so we can change games and rotate more. Would give a nice balance to the attack.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,370
Location
Flagg
Midfield is definitely the more urgent signing. As you correctly point out we continue to be an injury from disaster as proved in the SU and Villa games without Scotty. Every time Fred or Scott go into a challenge I flinch these days.

It's not a choice between signing a striker or a midfielder in January though. They will likely have a list of targets they believe they can get over the next two windows including 2 midfielders. If any of those players are available in January I'd expect they will go for them. They'd probably sign all 3 in January if it was possible. But clubs are reluctant to sell mid season so unfortunately it might just be Haaland that's available.

I can't see Ole signing someone he's not sure about just to boost the numbers either. We've signed way too many problems over the last 7 years to sign another on a several year contract just to cover a few months. You'd hope there must be someone out there though who could come in on a loan or short contract though. All they have to do is be a better holding midfielder than Andreas and Matic. That's not exactly a lot to ask.
You'd like to think that's how it works and we cn work on more than one target at a time, but when you listen to Woodward evidently this isn't the case.

If it was we'd have got it sorted in the summer as it was already beyond obvious then. It's not even like Herrera leaving happened suddenly. They literally knew months in advance.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
So if the rumours are true and Solskjaer did fly out to speak to him and his family this Friday, we've definitely had a bid accepted, which means this is much further along than most of the transfer rumours we hear about.
Well he could have just flown out to visit Mozart’s birthplace
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
You'd like to think that's how it works and we cn work on more than one target at a time, but when you listen to Woodward evidently this isn't the case.

If it was we'd have got it sorted in the summer as it was already beyond obvious then. It's not even like Herrera leaving happened suddenly. They literally knew months in advance.
So you think Ole's choice of midfielder is available this January but we're not going to sign him because Ed is only capable of doing one deal in the space of a month and has chose Haaland?

Come on. Be serious.
 

dev1l

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
9,598
So if the rumours are true and Solskjaer did fly out to speak to him and his family this Friday, we've definitely had a bid accepted, which means this is much further along than most of the transfer rumours we hear about.
Or else it might be a last ditch attempt after the player chose to play elsewhere
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,661
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Dont think that's an issue. He's played almost exclusively on the right. Only times he does up top is in the dead rubber games (and vs spurs where he didnt make much of an impact). On the right is perfect for his development and he's impressed. Long term I expect to see him up top, and realistically if we sign haaland itll be a trio of those 2 and Rashford imo. Not a problem having depth till all are ready though, and someone like haaland is necessary so we can change games and rotate more. Would give a nice balance to the attack.
My problem with it comes from a fear of the same happening to Greenwood, as has happened with Martial.

When Martial came he was an ice cold finisher, and then got stuck out wide. He's not developed as we'd all have hoped, and I feel that's partly due to shifting position a lot in his time with us.

This year its not much of a problem, but long term Greenwood needs to play up top when he gets his minutes rather than shunting him wide. (We also still need to add to our RW in the summer) which would eat even further into his playing time.

We'll see how it plays out anyways, as this is a signing I expect us to make
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Theres this new thing called injuries and squad depth
Haha I get that. But Haaland together with Rashford and Martial could lock Greenwood out of the team for years. Would we not be better getting someone towards the end of their career whilst Greenwood matures?
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,661
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Dont think that's an issue. He's played almost exclusively on the right. Only times he does up top is in the dead rubber games (and vs spurs where he didnt make much of an impact). On the right is perfect for his development and he's impressed. Long term I expect to see him up top, and realistically if we sign haaland itll be a trio of those 2 and Rashford imo. Not a problem having depth till all are ready though, and someone like haaland is necessary so we can change games and rotate more. Would give a nice balance to the attack.
My problem with it comes from a fear of the same happening to Greenwood, as has happened with Martial.

When Martial came he was an ice cold finisher, and then got stuck out wide. He's not developed as we'd all have hoped, and I feel that's partly due to shifting position a lot in his time with us.

This year its not much of a problem, but long term Greenwood needs to play up top when he gets his minutes rather than shunting him wide. (We also still need to add to our RW in the summer) which would eat even further into his playing time.

We'll see how it plays out anyways, as this is a signing I expect us to make
Screw it play him anywhere and he'll succeed
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,018
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Screw it play him anywhere and he'll succeed
Should be integrated into the first team next season. Imo he will end up the better footballer than Håaland too.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
I don’t know anything about this lad, I’m sure he’s good and all, but striker is not the position we should be focusing on right now.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,819
Location
In hibernation
It absolutely is. Paired with a proper midfielder or two.
Yup, Haaland or someone else, a striker should clearly be a priority. No doubt we need midfielders as well, but someone with a real striker’s instinct is exactly what we’ve missed in games like today.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,668
I don’t know anything about this lad, I’m sure he’s good and all, but striker is not the position we should be focusing on right now.
Sure, but it's a position we broadly need to recruit in. And he's available for a good fee. It's sort of a no brainer.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,018
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Without signing some better midfielders and full backs a striker won't resolve our problems.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,074
Location
?
Ok, forget everything I’ve said. Get this lad in. We need all the firepower we can get.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,635
I don’t think anybody is expecting Haaland to immediately walk into the team and that’s the end of martial.

we will bed him in slowly and let him adjust properly I’m sure. Anyway we play like 60 games a season, martial cannot play them all.

eventually it’ll drive up the competition and they won’t be able to have a few poor matches or they’ll get dropped. Look at aguero/Jesus, one of them gets injured or bad form and the other takes their chance.
Haaland will demand the starting spot. If Ole won't give him that, he'll go to Dortmund or whatever team can guarantee him. It's just common sense.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Haaland will demand the starting spot. If not, he'll go to Dortmund or whatever team can guarantee him. It's just common sense.
Well the way Rashford/Martial played today he would walk straight in.

I don't think any club will be taking those sort of demands from a 19 year old anyway, they'll tell him to prove his worth like any team.

Paco Alcacer is a good striker at Dortmund, he won't just walk in easy there either.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,635
Well the way Rashford/Martial played today he would walk straight in.

I don't think any club will be taking those sort of demands from a 19 year old anyway, they'll tell him to prove his worth like any team.

Paco Alcacer is a good striker at Dortmund, he won't just walk in easy there either.
That's fair point about Alcacer. I'm not sure on your claim about no club would be taking that demand. Let's see.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
That's fair point about Alcacer. I'm not sure on your claim about no club would be taking that demand. Let's see.
We might give him a minimum of 20 starts a season of something like that, but no way would a club be held to "you'll start every game" especially being inexperienced. He might not settle or take a while to get going.

Anyway I have a feeling he'll soon be in our starting line up especially in home games like that. Our current forwards suck when there's no space.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,635
We might give him a minimum of 20 starts a season of something like that, but no way would a club be held to "you'll start every game" especially being inexperienced. He might not settle or take a while to get going.

Anyway I have a feeling he'll soon be in our starting line up especially in home games like that. Our current forwards suck when there's no space.
Just to give any chance he'll sign for United, I just think that Ole needs to give him that assurance. Otherwise Dortmund is a more attractive destination. Lower pressure League, attacking team style, and better suppliers from midfield; thus better chance on scoring more goals.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,753
One of the reason why we should be signing him. Instead of Mata, we can bring proper attacker and then move either Rashford or Martial to #10 position.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,166
One of the reason why we should be signing him. Instead of Mata, we can bring proper attacker and then move either Rashford or Martial to #10 position.
None of those two can play 10. I'm the opposite. We don't need to sign him this January. We can do it in the summer.

This January, we need a #10 or someone creative to be in the front four.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,753
None of those two can play 10. I'm the opposite. We don't need to sign him this January. We can do it in the summer.

This January, we need a #10 or someone creative to be in the front four.
He might not be available till summer. His release clause is 20-25 million, shouldn't stop us from addressing other positions.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,563
Location
Oslo, Norway
My heart will bleed for Martial if we sign Haaland. Poor lad, what did he ever do to deserve this? :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.