djembatheking
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 4,075
It was , under the cosh here .Great cross from young Neville too.
It was , under the cosh here .Great cross from young Neville too.
Didn’t see the replay tonight but that’s how I remembered it first time round. England had a good 15-20 minutes after the break which made the difference. Tactical switch at half time gave England an overload Scotland couldn’t handle. Redknapp started to dictate but it was McManaman who was outstanding for England, their best player for the second game in a row IMO. The attacking level they hit there, repeated against Holland and Germany was obviously outwith Scotland’s reach, as solid as we were.England were dreadful in that first half, didn't have a shot on goal. Scots neat and tidy but lacked quality in final third.
I believe things pick up now....
Yeah second half England upped the tempo (pretty much just by telling McManaman to cut infield and run directly at Scotland's back 3 which created more space for likes of Neville on the overlap).Didn’t see the replay tonight but that’s how I remembered it first time round. England had a good 15-20 minutes after the break which made the difference. Tactical switch at half time gave England an overload Scotland couldn’t handle. Redknapp started to dictate but it was McManaman who was outstanding for England, their best player for the second game in a row IMO. The attacking level they hit there, repeated against Holland and Germany was obviously outwith Scotland’s reach, as solid as we were.
Still, next 15 minutes Scotland were the better team and Seaman’s save from Durie’s header doesn’t get the praise it deserves. Draw probably would have been the fairest result, but Gazza had a higher ceiling than anyone else on the park.
Be a good replacement for the ageing Steve Bruce, depends on how much Spurs want for himBig Sol on to tighten things up.
He was decent for Forest around that time. Was just an industrious right sided player who could play wing back (England were playing 3-5-2 then). Pretty similar to Milner.How the feck did Steve Stone have an England career?
We surely had better options.He was decent for Forest around that time. Was just an industrious right sided player who could play wing back (England were playing 3-5-2 then). Pretty similar to Milner.