Ridiculous rules - they’re following them here but the rules are badly written on thisWhy can you have benefit of a doubt for defenders but not attackers?
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Ridiculous rules - they’re following them here but the rules are badly written on thisWhy can you have benefit of a doubt for defenders but not attackers?
Rules are if you score it doesn’t matter. Ball to hand or not the goal is ruled out. The ball hits his arm then his chest. Its the right callEven if it hits his hand it’s bullshit, as it’s been cunted right at him from 5 yards away - ball to hand as it used to be called in more sensible times. But it fecking doesn’t touch his hand at any point? What have they even seen?
there is none. every time they modify the handball rule is gets more absurd.So that’s a handball but the Gabriel one wasn’t one? Where’s the consistency?
Agreed. Horrible decision to call that a handballAt this point they might as well make handballs binary. As long as the ball touches the hand it’s a foul.
I was trying to remember who it was scored against us with a blatant handball in the build up only for the goal to be given, thanks.fecking shambles. As always it's worth reminding ourselves about the Middlesbrough one.
So the Gabriel one from earlier today was also a handball?Don't blame the decision, blame the rule, it's a texbook application.
Let the Venezuelan's have something will youRondon. Jesus, he’s a player that just seems to exist and do nothing.
Im sure he’s been around since like 2003.
Yeah I know, it’s the rule I have an issue withRules are if you score it doesn’t matter. Ball to hand or not the goal is ruled out. The ball hits his arm then his chest. Its the right call
Exactly, ridiculous ruleSo ridiculous, because if Rashford dribbles past Pickford and passes it to Bruno who slots it into an open net from 2cm out then it's not a handball.
Those people exist?McT gets carded within 2 minutes of subbed in and some of you want him in over Casemiro…
It's not even the rule, it's the bizarre on/off application of it. West Ham scored today with almost the exact same circumstances - the ball ricocheted from leg to hand before the goal - yet that was allowed to stand.Yea it's a definite handball by the rule. It's the rule that's the issue.
Or Scamacca.So the Gabriel one from earlier today was also a handball?
This is about as guaranteed as you can get.Suspecting will end up in 2-2
David Coote