Andycoleno9
matchday malcontent
Knowing us we will give plus 1 option to Ronaldo and lose Garnacho
But what about the cost of living crisis?!I still feel that more contracts should be renewed without wage increases. Essentially no matter how well a player performs they get an increase when the contract is renewed.
Don't see anything wrong with saying to a player that they've performed on the level of their contract and it will remain the same, with a view to improving the salary if performances pick up.
Marcus Rashford (+1 option) - Let him go now
Luke Shaw (+1 option) - Let him go now
Cristiano Ronaldo (+1 option) - Let him go now
Fred (+1 option) - Take the 1 year option
Diogo Dalot - Renew
David de Gea (+1 option) - Let him go now
Axel Tuanzebe - Let him go now
Tahith Chong - Let him go now
Phil Jones (+1 option) - Let him go now
Alejandro Garnacho - Renew
Tom Heaton (+1 option) - Let him go now
Only amendment on this is Dalot should stay as a rotation/potential first choice if he carries on how he is.Garnacho aside, I don’t think I’d massively be bothered if we don’t retain any of those players. I think I’d actively look to let De Gea and Ronaldo go. Two huge positions if (replaced correctly) will massively change the complexion of the side.
Dalot will get an extension just down to the fact he’s currently our starting RB, and we don’t have the option(?), but I’d extend with the intention of letting him go.
Shaw, Rashford, and Fred should all be up for sale next summer (I’m assuming we’ll activate the plus 1) for the right sort of bid, which is kind of just any actual bid.
Tuanzebe, Jones, and Chong — thank you for your service.
Heaton can stay for the vibes and the fact that (hopefully) both Henderson and De Gea go.
Unless Rashford shows great form, will try to get rid.Thought I would have a look at this ahead of time, some big names in here and although a lot have a +1 option. I genuinely think we are better off just walking away from some names this summer.
Marcus Rashford (+1 option)
Luke Shaw (+1 option)
Cristiano Ronaldo (+1 option)
Fred (+1 option)
Diogo Dalot
David de Gea (+1 option)
Axel Tuanzebe
Tahith Chong
Phil Jones (+1 option)
Alejandro Garnacho
Tom Heaton (+1 option)
There is about £62million per annum coming off of the wage bill there. Out of those listed I obviously am a bit jumpy about the Garnacho situation, if we don't play him this year then someone else will and I think he will dart.
Amongst those I think it is only smart to activate Rashford and Shaw's options just because we can probably recoup some transfer fee next summer even if knocked down.
More upheaval coming next year as well I reckon.
I know, it'd be crazy to not extend Shaw and Rashford given they both have the potential to regain form and be valuable assets again at the very least.Crazy the pack mentality has become so strong on here that the vast majority of posters want to release England's starting LB on a free transfer
Also, you've not got to search far to find a post from me being critical of Rashford but I certainly don't think we should be releasing him on a free either, that would be mental.
We'll see that these two can definitely contribute in a more organised team under ETH
Completely agree with this.De Gea's contract should absolutely not be triggered, save the 20m he's gonna earn and let him go for free. The club sells Henderson for 20-30m depending on his form in the rest of the season and here's your budget for the next goalkeeper.
That's what any well-run club would do which makes me almost sure they're gonna do the complete opposite.
I don't think we have to let Shaw and Rashford go for free. Take-up the extra year option on both and then sell this January or next summer. And take what the market is offering. Its not going to be $40M for Shaw and $100M for Rashford as some seem to think. But, even $15M for Shaw and $35 to 40M for Rashford would result in an extra $50M to spend on replacements in addition to the savings on wages.I know, it'd be crazy to not extend Shaw and Rashford given they both have the potential to regain form and be valuable assets again at the very least.
It would be daft to let Fred go too, given how bereft of midfield backup we are.
Seriously only United could lose that list of players and get zero fees for them. We're the absolute worst at moving players on in every way possible.
Can't see many being sold in January with the squad so thin and the fixture logjam ahead.I don't think we have to let Shaw and Rashford go for free. Take-up the extra year option on both and then sell this January or next summer. And take what the market is offering. Its not going to be $40M for Shaw and $100M for Rashford as some seem to think. But, even $15M for Shaw and $35 to 40M for Rashford would result in an extra $50M to spend on replacements in addition to the savings on wages.
You put Rashford on the market for £30m and every club in Europe will be in for him. He’s much higher rated than people on this forum think.I don't think we have to let Shaw and Rashford go for free. Take-up the extra year option on both and then sell this January or next summer. And take what the market is offering. Its not going to be $40M for Shaw and $100M for Rashford as some seem to think. But, even $15M for Shaw and $35 to 40M for Rashford would result in an extra $50M to spend on replacements in addition to the savings on wages.
Under the previous regime overseen by the former executive vice-chairman, Ed Woodward, United often stood accused of stockpiling players and automatically exercising contract options or awarding new long-term deals that did not feel merited and created a false economy around depreciating assets.
Ten Hag wants to move away from that culture and is keen to ensure players do not fall into comfort zones and that any new deals are hard won.
Insiders claimed the club had been “bitten on the a--- by carrying people” in the past and that a desire for hungrier, more motivated players – coupled with the importance of keeping the wage bill in check – would drive change.
Thought I would have a look at this ahead of time, some big names in here and although a lot have a +1 option. I genuinely think we are better off just walking away from some names this summer.
Marcus Rashford (+1 option)
Luke Shaw (+1 option)
Cristiano Ronaldo (+1 option)
Fred (+1 option)
Diogo Dalot
David de Gea (+1 option)
Axel Tuanzebe
Tahith Chong
Phil Jones (+1 option)
Alejandro Garnacho
Tom Heaton (+1 option)
There is about £62million per annum coming off of the wage bill there. Out of those listed I obviously am a bit jumpy about the Garnacho situation, if we don't play him this year then someone else will and I think he will dart.
Amongst those I think it is only smart to activate Rashford and Shaw's options just because we can probably recoup some transfer fee next summer even if knocked down.
More upheaval coming next year as well I reckon.
Reading the first page of this thread, it is really shocking and laughable to see the amount of people advocating letting Rashford leave on a free. feck me.
Some of our fans suffer from memory loss, if a player hasn't performed well enough in the last 6-12 months then let him go on a free.
Reading the first page of this thread, it is really shocking and laughable to see the amount of people advocating letting Rashford leave on a free. feck me.
Should be renewed on reasonable wages but only if he is able to sustain good form for at least until April 2023, Rashford can be a good player under Ten Hag, but he is not a top player (aka a Kane or Mane) who is worthy of a top contract.
above is what I said about Rashford a month ago, so I am not advocating for Rashford to be let go on a free, but what if Rashford continued his dire performances of last season into this season, and did not show any improvements at all, what would be your thoughts? would it be reasonable to say for example activate the 1 year and sell?
Posted in the Transfer Thread by @mazhar13
This is really great news and excellent management by Ten Hag, the key quote in the article is: -
The only good thing about a contract that has an option of an additional year is that it will allow Ten Hag time to see these players up close for the whole season and determine if they are worth a new contract or let them go by end of this season.
Also there seems to be an attempt to control the wages: -
It would be absolutely unreasonable because:
1. He showed he is a loyal academy product with excellent work ethics
2. Last season we were in nowhere land, nobody did what it was supposed to do on the pitch, we played absolutely nothing
3. He played injured or not fully recovered
4. He showed in the past he can be above average, sometimes even world class (not as often as we wanted to be).
Thought I would have a look at this ahead of time, some big names in here and although a lot have a +1 option. I genuinely think we are better off just walking away from some names this summer.
Marcus Rashford (+1 option)
Luke Shaw (+1 option)
Cristiano Ronaldo (+1 option)
Fred (+1 option)
Diogo Dalot
David de Gea (+1 option)
Axel Tuanzebe
Tahith Chong
Phil Jones (+1 option)
Alejandro Garnacho
Tom Heaton (+1 option)
There is about £62million per annum coming off of the wage bill there. Out of those listed I obviously am a bit jumpy about the Garnacho situation, if we don't play him this year then someone else will and I think he will dart.
Amongst those I think it is only smart to activate Rashford and Shaw's options just because we can probably recoup some transfer fee next summer even if knocked down.
More upheaval coming next year as well I reckon.