Antisocial
Has a Sony home cinema
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,639
I’m just sorry they didn’t go further.
I read that in Morgan Freeman's voice.That was the moment harry finally looked like a captain
So we are spending money in January after all I see...
If you look at the SkySports video posted on YouTube from time 2:26, the referee clearly extends a straight arm, in response to the assistant’s raised flag, an holds it until the goal keeper kicks the ball, which I understand to be the regulation mandated signal for an indirect free kick, not the moving arm of a ‘play on’ gesture.I'm saying illegal.
Flag has gone up, pawson is indicating an indirect free kick.
Keeper launches it from his hands.
I'm not saying it would've stopped us losing, but to concede like that after having a go can be devastating for a teams moral.
Pawson like every ref at scamfield recently was pissweak, he gave everything the crowd shouted for including goals that VAR had to pull him on.
Imagine saying physical violence should have been used because of a decision made during a game of footballShould have decked the cnut
The FA are a bunch of twats anyway.
The VAR review is on the actual decision, not any reaction.Had the players not reacted like the that goal would have stood, guarantee it.
I'm glad he said something. Let the anger out Ole!I'm wondering if this is because Ole commented negatively on the card in his presser?
When asked about the incident towards the end of the presser he initially says no comment but after being pushed he says "Sorry Karen", as if they had some prior agreement not to touch on the incident, then went on to say that he feels DdG was right to be annoyed about the lack of protection and VAR proved this.
Absolutely 100% agree. If they'd done the same with the Everton goal and McBurnie's equaliser, those decisions would have gone in United's favour too.Had the players not reacted like the that goal would have stood, guarantee it.