Antisocial
Has a Sony home cinema
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,643
More than the stupid precedent, they would have embarrassed themselves IMO.Unbelievably stupid precedent to have set, you'd have thought.
Even if it has nothing to do with corruption, you realize how much football is sick when you see pathetic diving attempts and cheating in friendly matches among friends. What we see on TV, behavior from pros and from people who represent football, they have an influence on a lot of people.Football is rotten into the core
What Moggi did at Juve is nothing compared to the Blatter's mafia.
Yep, it makes no fecking sense at all. Stupid as well as corrupt.On what basis could a legal case be made regarding the Henry handball ? All the ref would have said is "Sorry didn't see it " and that's that.
Nope the Swiss have said that they are not investigating Blatter.but arent the swiss investigating him as well - better safe with hookers & caviar on demand than in a cell
Makes you wonder about the reason behind paying them off.Yep, it makes no fecking sense at all. Stupid as well as corrupt.
Seems that Blatter in his latter years was quick to act on matters like this. TH handles and knocks Ireland out of the World Cup give them a £5m loan that they repay if they make the next world cup.Makes you wonder about the reason behind paying them off.
They got bought off very cheap. Should have asked for a full world cup share.this is tremendous. The irish cry for weeks about the handball then accept cash not to take the case all the way
Since about 1988.I'm livid with the FAI
Christ, if even half this shit is true, how fecking deep does this rabbithole go?http://www.zeit.de/sport/2015-06/chuck-blazer-fifa-fussball-weltmeisterschaft-2022
I assume this will be in English soon. It alleges Germany made certain deals to guarantee the World Cup, including arms to Saudi Arabia.
Unfortunately, it's effectively impossible to prove these deals are bribes, except potentially the last one.Christ, if even half this shit is true, how fecking deep does this rabbithole go?
Ha, I doubt it. A large contingent of the FAI will think Delaney pulled a cute stroke by scalping FIFA for €5 million.How's the overall reaction in Ireland? Surely this means they people in charge have to quit now.
Yeah, it's most definitely legal, but it's still shady looking. Like Beckenbauer going to work for Gazprom 6 months after voting for Russia (most likely).The article also states that those things were most likely "legal" but not very sportsmanlike and that these infos aren't new but have been known for 10 years. Just nobody really picked up on it or wanted to talk about it (perhaps as it involves a Western World Cup).
Much better.
Why would they have a case?So, when we will see actual real legal challenge against on-field decision? Heavily implied that the Irish somehow actually had a case...
I dunno but Fifa must have thought so.Why would they have a case?
Maybe Ireland or someone had a smoking gun that FIFA feared would bring the whole house down? I'm saying this because it looks like FIFA had a number of people gunning for them so it's not beyond the realms of possibility that this case, as stupid as it sounds, could have afforded such individuals a platform to air out some dirt on them.This is a really strange one. I've no idea at all what Ireland's case was. Bad decision happen all the time and you can't seek compensation.
FIFA tend to go to all costs to avoid any legal wrangles, probably to try and hide what's come out. Bearing in mind that Fifa wouldn't have had to pay if it went to court (the case would probably be laughed at) fifa probably just 'loaned' it to keep them sweet. I think this is much worse for the FAI than Fifa.
The deals they are talking about there are very much the kind of horse-trading that passes for global diplomacy and developing international trade relations. Not that different to the kind of dealing that goes on for UN votes or on a single nation scale the kind of deals that are believed to be offered to US Senators in return for votes/influence. It's not really surprising to see FIFA and the World Cup in the blend. I seem to remember Britain's attempt at relationship building with China in the 70s being reflected in London Zoo getting a pair of Giant Pandas.The article also states that those things were most likely "legal" but not very sportsmanlike and that these infos aren't new but have been known for 10 years. Just nobody really picked up on it or wanted to talk about it (perhaps as it involves a Western World Cup).
No idea, but both them and FIFA thought so.Why would they have a case?
Looks like a bad TV movie - passHas anyone actually seen the FIFA film? I really want to.