And who would that RB signing be? I don't see anyone who'd be good enough and attainable.
I don't know either.
I feel like we've been at this point of the discussion before, somewhere a few pages ago, and I don't think we'll get further in our arguments this time around.
My point is merely that I'm highly sceptical of the 'Kimmich the destined Lahm successor' narrative. Not because I don't like it, but because I like it too much.
It's wishful thinking at this point, because it corresponds more to what we think, and hope, should work out than to what evidence we can see in things that have happened on the pitch.
On the pitch, in reality, Kimmich has virtually never been used as a right back for us (maybe once?), neither by Pep or by Carlo. He's here almost 2 years, mind you.
And since he virtually hasn't played the position, we have virtually no actual evidence that he can play it. (Some of us, me included, had the same wishful thinking with Rode, in the end he played RB maybe twice including the shocker against Wolfsburg..)
Yes, Kimmich has played RB in a handful of NT games now, and he did well.
But first of all, NT football is a different level of football, and secondly, that too were only few games to judge from.
With that logic, there's surely a number of RBs out there who've shown more high level right back performances in real life than Kimmich has shown.
As I said before, and i will leave it at that, I'm happy for us to try, if miraculously Carlo all of sudden sees Kimmich as a RB (though I suspect if he does, it's less miraculously than ordered from above which is a problem in itself). He's our kid, he's a good kid, and I will be happy wherever and whenever he plays.
But let's not pretend like it is a no-brainer.
Let's also not forget we added Rudy, and have recently briefed the media that '€20m for Henrichs is too expensive' (this kind of media leak reallly gets on my fecking nerves
).
It smacks of us trying to construct on whole Lahm by adding together three parts of one Rafinha, one Rudy and one Kimmich each.