Cheers!
Haha. This.
If we ever dropped a point, that was it, we was in a mood and thought the title was impossible, even if it was game 1. Absolute money pitThis really pisses me off. Are they trying to sell the pile of turd they are trying to pass off as a 3D engine as something great? It's a pile of horse shit, look at football games it's 2016 and one of the best selling PC games every year can't afford to hire a team that makes a 3D engine that delivers some actually watchable 3D game that manages to get across some real football atmo?
Football Manager said:
Yup. It's basically the same game with bare minimum interface tweaks.
Liked 2 features, that's it:
That game was god awful
Which is a very good idea if they can just get the match engine right from the off.
They do, but the downgrade for guys like Adnan and Pereira won't be very significant I feel, just like last season as they are still contracted to a big club. A bit similar case to Wilson's case this year
I think a lot is down to catering for the majority.
Something to do with them developing their own engine in house, with a small team.
Probably because there is plenty of people who don't give a damn about the 3D engine and haven't used once, so the extra cost in development is deemed useless?
No, they're all in on the 3D look.
I use the 3-D engine mostly. The problem is that in the 3-D view, the game looks unrealistic. As in, there are a few misses that hardly happen in real life, whereas they are too common in FM. Just as an example, in one on ones, players do miss goals that way, but a striker from a top team does not miss 4-5 one on ones against a GK of an average side. In 2-D engine it looks unrealistic. So until, their match engine doesn't become really good, I'd much rather have poor graphics than have great graphics to amplify these shortcomings
They are doing a poor job then.
*Cavani looks around nervously*
They are always making a big deal of the 3D engine, saying they've made improvements etc, but it always looks and feels the same way every year with very small changes.
I suppose a lot depends on who you take over really.
Out of curiosity, what don't you like about it / what did you want from it?
I generally either start with Utd, but lose interest after a few seasons or start unemployed with no prior playing experience or badges. In the latter case as well, you typically get a job after 4-5 seasons in Championship/PL level clubs depending on prior results and leagues that you load. But from the 2nd season onwards(even for teams battling against relegation), it becomes far too easy to atleast qualify for CL, due to a great scouting network and too many regens who are wonderkids
I've had issues with the format and formula of FM for years mate. The whole series is stale to me and I find my hours spent on it are through boredom rather than a genuine interest in the game anymore. SI seem to change the smallest things year after year and fail to push for anything substantial to me. My main driver over the past 4 years in each edition has been to pick a formation and get dominance from that because I'm a football geek I guess.
To an extent I do agree. One of my biggest issues with the game is simply the ability to buy very good young players and progress them
Yeah fair enough. I don't really know how you play, but to be honest, I can't ever play single player anymore. I just don't get the motivation to play it. None of the game ever appeals to me to be honest, but I play with a few friends, now that just adds some real competition and I think that's what keeps me interested.
pr0 does regular updates until the release of the next title with optional form/stat changes.
