Drz
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,360
Legally Barca didn't do anything wrong so he wouldn't have been able to put lawyers on to it. Morally is a different story, but we know that Barca are a morally-bankrupt club.
Barca were in financial trouble and De Jong agreed to help them by changing his contract to get paid very little (relatively speaking) in his first couple of seasons but then his wage would increase so he'd get that difference paid back to him in his last couple of seasons. Barca then turned around halfway through his contract and said thanks for helping us and playing for cheap, but now either feck off so we don't have to pay you what you agreed to postpone, or stay on your original contract and forget about the money you postponed. Either way De Jong was down over £15m from the years that he'd agreed to play for cheap, but if he'd agreed to move to another club or agreed a new contract he wouldn't have had a leg to stand on to get it.
I respect that he refused to let Barca get away with their bullshit, and just stayed there on his contract so they have to honour it. If we heard about that in any other industry we'd be cheering for the worker not allowing the big company to screw them over.
That is a fair assessment. Can't shake the feeling it won't work for us though.
Besides, I think we need a younger version of Casemiro more. And with Mount returning from injury, Mainoo's potential and all the noise around J. Fletcher. I think a quality DM or even two if Casemiro leaves in the summer should be the priority for building our midfield.
Beyond that, how would you use Frenkie, if he were brought in? And what would be your ideal signing in midfield? (player or position even...)