Bojan11
Full Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,115
Rockstar have nothing to do with Mafia.Isn't this why R* made Mafia? A GTA style open world game set in older times?
Rockstar have nothing to do with Mafia.Isn't this why R* made Mafia? A GTA style open world game set in older times?
Well now I look like a twat That'll teach me not to check things on Google.Rockstar have nothing to do with Mafia.
I bet you clap when the plane lands.I think they’re incredibly overrated games. Only one I ever really got into was Vice City.
Absolutely 0% chance that it'd be a PS exclusiveFirstly, forgive me for bumping this thread when there's no official update - a horrific sin.
Last few weeks though there seems to be some organic traction gaining with this game and various speculation.
My attitude to gaming is pretty blasé these days but speculation of a new GTA takes me right back to reading magazine articles in PSM with big Vice City and San Andreas reveals, and being so excited just that there was simply a countdown webpage to the first teaser trailer of GTA IV.
If GTA VI is announced to come out as a PS5 exclusive I will jizz everywhere. It's disappointing that PS4 gen never got a dedicated version of the game. Perhaps you could say RDR2 was Rockstars only chance at it. Even GTA VI will probably be nerfed somewhat to be released on current gen as well as next gen. Though if RDR2 is anything to go by it'll be amazing.
Once again I am sorry.
Well because it's my fantasy and you never know it's plausible that it could be a timed exclusive of sorts.Why would they make it a ps5 exclusive?
I’m the same. I want to like them. I try to like them and GTA V was impressive to look at but I just seem to give up on them pretty quickly.I think they’re incredibly overrated games. Only one I ever really got into was Vice City.
Rockstar has been very lazy this gen. Refusing to make a single player DLC for GTA 5 or RDR2 when fans are begging for it for years. Just putting crap into online and charging it 5mil for a car. I have played a lot of GTA online, I still am. Its enjoyable. But the games are desperate for dlc, What happened to CJ or Mcgready for GTA 5 and Sadie Adler for RDR 2.
Last gen they made. GTA 4,5, Mad Max, LA Noire and RDR. 2 brand new games. Yet they can't do shit this gen. GTA 5 was a bit shit in story standards. RDR 2 was a masterpiece for me at least. Incredible game. Just they could have easily done more but they are focused on multiplayer!
No chance. They will have an absolutely cracking single player story line and then it will be online taking over just like V.I think the future of GTA will be online, I fear GTA 6's single player will be an after thought with the online taking priority. I'll probably still end up buying it but I'm not expecting it to be on the level of San Andreas.
A lot of people were saying that before RDR2 though because of GTAV and it turned out to not be the case. It was their biggest, most sprawling and detailed game yet.agree with @horsechoker and I fear the next GTA will be a massive let down and that proper single player will be ignored.
Why is it being exclusive a fantasy? Seems a strange fantasy to have?Well because it's my fantasy and you never know it's plausible that it could be a timed exclusive of sorts.
Come on, you can accuse Rockstar of many things, but saying they're lazy isn't one of them. Red Dead Redemption 2 is one of the most dense, single player experiences we've ever seen in gaming. I'm not a fan of RD2, but it's an impressive game. Most game companies could release a trilogy of games, DLC and all, and still not come close to the single player content in RD2.Rockstar has been very lazy this gen. Refusing to make a single player DLC for GTA 5 or RDR2 when fans are begging for it for years. Just putting crap into online and charging it 5mil for a car. I have played a lot of GTA online, I still am. Its enjoyable. But the games are desperate for dlc, What happened to CJ or Mcgready for GTA 5 and Sadie Adler for RDR 2.
Last gen they made. GTA 4,5, Mad Max, LA Noire and RDR. 2 brand new games. Yet they can't do shit this gen. GTA 5 was a bit shit in story standards. RDR 2 was a masterpiece for me at least. Incredible game. Just they could have easily done more but they are focused on multiplayer!
I used to absolutely love the GTA games and be pumped for each new release. But GTA5 was the end of the fan in me. Eventually I think I moved beyond games with such basic gameplay mechanics. Or at least the fascination with them went down. I'll always play them for the 'fun factor' but they no longer register among my most cherished gaming experiences. Same with the latest Red Dead.I think they’re incredibly overrated games. Only one I ever really got into was Vice City.
If you read the rest of it, you’ll see I called RDR 2 a masterpiece. I love that game, best open world I’ve ever seen, feels very real and alive. Like Witcher 3. But what I’m saying is the made ONE game this gen. they ported up GTA 5 to this gen when it was made it the last year for the last gen. That’s what I mean by lazy. They can easily do better then that. They’ve plenty of teams to do so. Not saying they should make 4 new games, just more then one isn’t asking much.Come on, you can accuse Rockstar of many things, but saying they're lazy isn't one of them. Red Dead Redemption 2 is one of the most dense, single player experiences we've ever seen in gaming. I'm not a fan of RD2, but it's an impressive game. Most game companies could release a trilogy of games, DLC and all, and still not come close to the single player content in RD2.
It would also be crazy for them not to focus on multiplayer.
Rockstar isn't one studio, it's over half a dozenIf you read the rest of it, you’ll see I called RDR 2 a masterpiece. I love that game, best open world I’ve ever seen, feels very real and alive. Like Witcher 3. But what I’m saying is the made ONE game this gen. they ported up GTA 5 to this gen when it was made it the last year for the last gen. That’s what I mean by lazy. They can easily do better then that. They’ve plenty of teams to do so. Not saying they should make 4 new games, just more then one isn’t asking much.
I’d like that idea. But as long as the other guy backs out I’ll still be able to play the mission. It won’t kick me out of the game. That’s the major problem with GTA5 online. Can’t complete a mission without some idiot leaving the minute it starts.They could merge some of the bigger single player missions with optional matchmaking like other games such as Destiny or Division which also have open world areas.
I think that's how monster hunter world works. Although I never really see random people joining my session.I’d like that idea. But as long as the other guy backs out I’ll still be able to play the mission. It won’t kick me out of the game. That’s the major problem with GTA5 online. Can’t complete a mission without some idiot leaving the minute it starts.
I hope you’re right, but it’s the lack of single player DLC and the absolute rinsing of the online side of it since release that just makes me worry about it.A lot of people were saying that before RDR2 though because of GTAV and it turned out to not be the case. It was their biggest, most sprawling and detailed game yet.
I can't see it happening. Rockstar have their reputation based on their games garnering insane review scores and people first buying them for single player. GTAVI will be a while away yes but it won't neglect the single player.
The big question is whether Rockstar decides to help the RP community by providing the tools to help them, they currently have a very strange attitude towards the RP community.I don't think anyone can blame Rockstar with GTA V. I don't think they could have anticipated how well it would be received and the amount of content they've made available for it has meant that massive youtubers have been able to keep uploading content in GTA V and remain happy along with their viewers. They aren't stupid though and know that there are a lot of people who are casual online players but want a great story.
Looking back at GTA V the story didn't feel that long. You can complete it in a day or two if you really want to. They should really make some of the content available offline in a Forza Horizon 4 style though. I.e each month there is content that comes out and you have the choice to play it online or offline. There were times that I really wanted to be able to create custom heists by myself. I haven't played it for a while but in terms of heist customisation they could have taken it much further. Being able to choose a jewel store to rob and exactly how you wanted to do it without being given options was what they promised and didn't really give.
I did read the rest of it. They're not lazy. They're one of the hardest working studios in the business. The point I'm making is, is that you said they made one game this gen, but this isn't a "normal" game. It's almost incomparable to any other game that has been made. The time and money they put into it is unheard of, really. They could've easily made two or three games in that time, probably. But they dedicated all their time to that game. Also, they work a lot on the online aspect of things, whether that's GTA 5, or RDR2. That may be something you aren't too fussed on, or at least you think they should put their time and effort into single player content instead, but in no way is that down too laziness. They just going where the money is taking them. They've released a lot of online content for GTA 5 and RD2.If you read the rest of it, you’ll see I called RDR 2 a masterpiece. I love that game, best open world I’ve ever seen, feels very real and alive. Like Witcher 3. But what I’m saying is the made ONE game this gen. they ported up GTA 5 to this gen when it was made it the last year for the last gen. That’s what I mean by lazy. They can easily do better then that. They’ve plenty of teams to do so. Not saying they should make 4 new games, just more then one isn’t asking much.
What a weird, selfish fantasy to have.Well because it's my fantasy and you never know it's plausible that it could be a timed exclusive of sorts.
Yeah, bizarre. Something you'd expect a twelve year old to say.What a weird, selfish fantasy to have.
Why would a game being exclusive to a system be your fantasy? Weird.Well because it's my fantasy and you never know it's plausible that it could be a timed exclusive of sorts.
I too fantasise about loads of people not getting to enjoy something. I do it while watching tentacle porn in my mother's basement.Grand Theft Auto - serious business