Jeppers7
Pogfamily Mafia
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 7,435
I love this
Oh
It’s TC23 all over again
Made me chuckle and nodAnd to answer your question, no. I work, and don't have time to sit and follow every transfer.
or CR7It’s TC23 all over again
fair play.
Should give it to Bruno Fernandes, he’s much suited to that number. Think he had 8 at sporting.Pogba 6
Sancho 7 YES
Martial 9
Rashford 10
Greenwood 11
Just need a worldie for no.8 now.
Guess I’m just a grumpy old fart and don’t see what’s wrong in calling him his name instead of his number.fair play.
not sure why you disliked it anyway. I thought it was pretty good.
Ronaldo had R9 on his boots over 20 years ago. He’s always had that moniker.Guess I’m just a grumpy old fart and don’t see what’s wrong in calling him his name instead of his number.
I can’t remember fenomeno being called R9 at the time either, it’s all a more made up recent thing since Cristiano had the cr7 to distinguish him from the Brazilian ronaldo? Then messi, fair enough two greats, then cleverly, then martial, it’s just seems now if you Think you’re good, you can be called by just your initials and number. Like Beckham May have been the first to have stitched name boots with db7 on them but I can’t remember him ever ever being referred to or called db7
I understand that’s a totally pointless morning moan
Same as what I said for beckham, they may have had it on their boots but I can’t remember them being referred by as thatRonaldo had R9 on his boots over 20 years ago. He’s always had that moniker.
You only see it more now because there is more online stuff where people write short form. Nobody calls them that in real life, except for perhaps weird little kids.
R9 is better than Fat Ronaldo.Ronaldo had R9 on his boots over 20 years ago. He’s always had that moniker.
You only see it more now because there is more online stuff where people write short form. Nobody calls them that in real life, except for perhaps weird little kids.
Josh kingNow why on earth would they keep the number 7 shirt vacant I wonder...
BrunoPogba 6
Sancho 7 YES
Martial 9
Rashford 10
Greenwood 11
Just need a worldie for no.8 now.
Did Twitter and football forums exist and were popular in the 90s? I don’t think so, no one had a reason to call them that. They still had it on their boots and all over tshirts and clothing and posters. I’ve never heard a single person say CR7 in real life. It’s a short form for online speak and Twitter.Same as what I said for beckham, they may have had it on their boots but I can’t remember them being referred by as that
Ok fair enough, I don’t see the harm in just writing Greenwood instead of mg11 Or cleverly instead of tc23. Maybe I don’t appreciate the twitter character limit enough as I don’t use it.Did Twitter and football forums exist and were popular in the 90s? I don’t think so, no one had a reason to call them that. They still had it on their boots and all over tshirts and clothing and posters. I’ve never heard a single person say CR7 in real life. It’s a short form for online speak and Twitter.
Bruno when Mata leaves? Mejbri in the future?Pogba 6
Sancho 7 YES
Martial 9
Rashford 10
Greenwood 11
Just need a worldie for no.8 now.
Should’ve given him 22 in honour of BellinghamYou guys do realise that they can't give Greenwood both 11 & 7, don't you?
Had they given him 7, then you'd all be posting the same thing, but saying stuff like "I wonder who will get 11"?
It comes from the very old days where you had:Oh ok, i honestly hadn't noticed
JK7 incomingJosh king
It’s TC23 all over again
or CR7
12 Mike Smalling
You sound like a purist like me.Just me who really wants the #2 taken from Lindelof and the #3 taken from Bailly?
Not suited to CBs and it hurts my eyes.
Jones having the #4 upsets me too. I want it to be given to someone who plays.
In the classic 4-4-2 9 of the numbers go without saying.It comes from the very old days where you had:
two full backs on the flanks, no.2 and no.3
Then
three half backs nos. 4, 5, 6 (no.5 was known as the centre half).
Then five forwards! 7 right wing, 8 inside right, 9 centre forward, 10 inside left and 11 left wing.
Them were the days.
5 or 6.What number should CBs have?
A slight correction... the names Right wing and Left wing were invented a bit later. The original names for the 7 and 11 positions were Outside Right and Outside Left, respectively.It comes from the very old days where you had:
two full backs on the flanks, no.2 and no.3
Then
three half backs nos. 4, 5, 6 (no.5 was known as the centre half).
Then five forwards! 7 right wing, 8 inside right, 9 centre forward, 10 inside left and 11 left wing.
Them were the days.
Yes, that’s absolutely right! Thank you.A slight correction... the names Right wing and Left wing were invented a bit later. The original names for the 7 and 11 positions were Outside Right and Outside Left, respectively.
Them were the days indeed!
Clearly I’m being pedantic, but why is Rashfords 10 in one box, whilst Greenwood’s 11 is in two boxes. I wouldn’t be happy seeing that go out!That's an excellent powerful picture. Bravo to whoever took it.
I don't know boss. I was commenting on the picture itself. Maybe the max on sticker number is 10?Clearly I’m being pedantic, but why is Rashfords 10 in one box, whilst Greenwood’s 11 is in two boxes. I wouldn’t be happy seeing that go out!
I’ve always associated 6 with CB.In the classic 4-4-2 9 of the numbers go without saying.
But some people debate which of 4 & 6 are centre back and which centre mid.
You often hear "Number 6" role as being midfield these days, and that's what I would have gone with, 4&5 centre back, 6 in midfield, but I know some 4s were centre mid.
I know, and I want having a go at you, just that this sort of thing draws me out of the moment. I end up focusing on something that doesn’t look right, rather than the actual message/ picture.I don't know boss. I was commenting on the picture itself. Maybe the max on sticker number is 10?
It's ok boss. It means that you look deeper than just fancy picture.I know, and I want having a go at you, just that this sort of thing draws me out of the moment. I end up focusing on something that doesn’t look right, rather than the actual message/ picture.
But when people are on about midfielders you always hear talk of whether someone is a 6 or 8.I’ve always associated 6 with CB.
At Utd we have had Pallister, Stam, Ferdinand (before moving to 5), Brown, Evans, I’m sure a couple more.
Off the top of my head I think 4 has been our least used number for a centre back, in the PL out of 4,5,6.
I know! I imagine if you’ve never watched football, it must be pretty confusing.But when people are on about midfielders you always hear talk of whether someone is a 6 or 8.
Never a 4
Those Icelandic women look pretty hot to be fair.Mason Greenwood and Phil Foden 'had girls back to hotel rooms' breaking strict England Covid bubble after Iceland game.
why are those rich players so stupid?!