Ok buddy.History disagrees here, buddy
Ok buddy.History disagrees here, buddy
Seriously dude, why care about sell on value if we never sell anyone?Ok buddy.
Dude, it's a joke.Seriously dude, why care about sell on value if we never sell anyone?
One never knowsDude, it's a joke.
fixed it for youKane,Muani & Rashford seems like a good front 3 variable strikers.
Never said that. I would rather see a younger player than Kane coming here.We’re not getting Kane and Muani, mate.
You know posters don't know Kane at all when they point to his injury recordKane is great but im not sure he will leave the goldfish bowl behind
secondly his injury record and our luck with injuries
This seasonHe is hardly ever injured
Huh? This season he’s achieved playing relatively injury free but previous seasons, are we just discounting those? We are talking about a player who will be coming into his 30s, do we expect less niggles?You know posters don't know Kane at all when they point to his injury record
Makes me wonder how little they know about Osimhen if they speak this way about Kane who plays in our league.
Season | Injury | Days | Games missed |
---|---|---|---|
20/21 | Ankle Injury | 6 days | 2 |
20/21 | Ankle Injury | 7 days | 2 |
20/21 | Unknown Injury | 5 days | 1 |
19/20 | Fitness | 23 days | 1 |
19/20 | Thigh muscle rupture | 67 days | 14 |
19/20 | Ill | 3 days | 1 |
18/19 | Ligament Injury | 51 days | 9 |
18/19 | Torn Ankle Ligament | 40 days | 8 |
18/19 | Back Injury | 2 days | - |
17/18 | Ankle Injury | 20 days | 2 |
17/18 | Knee Injury | 8 days | - |
17/18 | Hamstring Injury | 7 days | 2 |
16/17 | Ankle Injury | 24 days | 3 |
16/17 | Ankle Injury | 49 days | 11 |
13/14 | Back Injury | 49 days | 11 |
https://www.transfermarkt.com/harry-kane/verletzungen/spieler/132098This season
22/23 | Biceps femoris muscle injury | 32 days | 6 |
21/22 | Muscular problems | 2 days | - |
21/22 | Corona virus | 11 days | 2 |
21/22 | Cheekbone Fracture | 54 days | 12 |
21/22 | Calf Strain | 7 days | 2 |
20/21 | Head Injury | 11 days | 3 |
20/21 | Corona virus | 21 days | 6 |
20/21 | Shoulder Injury | 62 days | 14 |
17/18 | Shoulder Injury | 79 days | 5 |
17/18 | Shoulder Injury | 35 days | 5 |
17/18 | Calf Problems | 14 days | 2 |
16/17 | Meniscal Injury | 178 days | ? |
2 ankle injuries? I know it’s only a week each but he’s getting older so expect these to start happening more oftenhttps://www.transfermarkt.com/harry-kane/verletzungen/spieler/132098
Since 19/20 he hasn’t had an injury that’s bad?
Yes, we don't need to count one's where he had injuries from isolated incidents that occcured almost 3 years ago.Huh? This season he’s achieved playing relatively injury free but previous seasons, are we just discounting those? We are talking about a player who will be coming into his 30s, do we expect less niggles?
Osimhen, I’d think hard about investing in him too
Kane
Season Injury Days Games missed 20/21 Ankle Injury 6 days 2 20/21 Ankle Injury 7 days 2 20/21 Unknown Injury 5 days 1 19/20 Fitness 23 days 1 19/20 Thigh muscle rupture 67 days 14 19/20 Ill 3 days 1 18/19 Ligament Injury 51 days 9 18/19 Torn Ankle Ligament 40 days 8 18/19 Back Injury 2 days - 17/18 Ankle Injury 20 days 2 17/18 Knee Injury 8 days - 17/18 Hamstring Injury 7 days 2 16/17 Ankle Injury 24 days 3 16/17 Ankle Injury 49 days 11 13/14 Back Injury 49 days 11
He missed 5 games in 20/21.2 ankle injuries? I know it’s only a week each but he’s getting older so expect these to start happening more often
if United sign him, great, but it will cost the guys of 100m to do so and I’d want someone who we can rely on.
besides not convinced he’s gonna leave spurs now
Oh so you can talk without petty insults?Yes, we don't need to count one's where he had injuries from isolated incidents that occcured almost 3 years ago.
The fact that he has 3 seasons of dependable appearances shows he doesn't have an injury record to worry about.
Sorry, but it gets really annoying when a Kane injury narrative is peddled again. Just comes across lazy.Oh so you can talk without petty insults?
how do you get “3 seasons of dependable appearances”?
You're not factoring his playing style. Look at how the likes of Lewa, of a similar ilk, age with time.You guys are not factoring in his age
Yes and the build of that lad with his running style means he will always be prone to muscle injuries. I wouldn’t touch him anyway. You’d have to build your team to suit him, rather than dropping him into a system that already works.You're not factoring his playing style. Look at how the likes of Lewa, of a similar ilk, age with time.
Explosive players who rely on physicality and pace tend to be 1) more injury prone and 2) fizzle out faster. Have you seen Haalands injury stats by the way?
And last and the season before that…This season
He whispers slowly in James ducker’s ears.Where does ten hag say this about kane or rumour?
To be fair to Osimhen, Covid x2, a cheekbone fracture and a head injury are no indications of a susceptibility to injury. What is/was up with his shoulder though?Osimhen
22/23 Biceps femoris muscle injury 32 days 6 21/22 Muscular problems 2 days - 21/22 Corona virus 11 days 2 21/22 Cheekbone Fracture 54 days 12 21/22 Calf Strain 7 days 2 20/21 Head Injury 11 days 3 20/21 Corona virus 21 days 6 20/21 Shoulder Injury 62 days 14 17/18 Shoulder Injury 79 days 5 17/18 Shoulder Injury 35 days 5 17/18 Calf Problems 14 days 2 16/17 Meniscal Injury 178 days ?
Neither of which solves our CF deficiancy.kane is going nowhere this summer. ye really should stop upsetting yourselves and maybe have a gander at a double swoop for fati and de jong from barca.
He's not wrongTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Solid signing for Spurs to replace Kane if/when he leaves. We should be going for the best - I.e. Kane himself.Agree about Toney in for Kane, ideal squad player.
So you pray that one of the finest strikers of this generation (200 premier league goals and the rate is not slowing) is not bought and instead we go with Ivan Toney (25 PL goals). Because he's better value for the future (2 years and 9 months younger).I really hope and pray we don't waste money on Kane. If we spend big on a striker then please let it be Ivan Toney. Far better value for the future
So you pray that one of the finest strikers of this generation (200 premier league goals and the rate is not slowing) is not bought and instead we go with Ivan Toney (25 PL goals). Because he's better value for the future (2 years and 9 months younger).
Don't get me wrong, I like Toney and he'd do a good job for us. But he's at least 2 levels down from Kane.
Edit - I don't even think Toney would end up being that much cheaper!
Give me some of what you're smoking because it seems strong as shit. Kane is 29 so what exactly makes you think Kane is fast leaving his peak? Have you seen how long strikers these days play for? Lewandowski is 34 and doesn't seem to be slowing down with 14 goals in 17 La Liga matches. If we can get Kane for another 4 years at top level that would be fantastic. Kane has 17 goals so far and he has played 23 matches.Toney is coming into his peak Kane is fast leaving his