Kane would be a stopgap solution, the kind of trap we love falling into. Kane would put us back in contention for winning the league, maybe for one season. He turns 30 in July. As we saw with Ronaldo, you could be an absolute finishing machine, but when you lose that step of pace, you become a one-trick pony.
How many years would Kane have left playing at full tilt, in a pressing side like ETH wants? If he wants to sign on a 1-year rolling contract, sign him up, but I think after a couple years we will again have the problem of finding a forward to lead the line. For the money we'd have to fork over, wouldn't it make more sense to buy a player closer to hitting his peak, at like 23 or 24, and have him for 7 or 8 years?