Shane88
Actually Nostradamus
Lovely, our very own Andy Carroll.
Yep, I agree completely.For that money? Thats crazy talk, I'd rather spend 80m on Bale than 45m on Kane
Andy Caroll's attitude is on different level to Kane, I 'm almost certain he will be 150+ goals striker in the league just because of his character..this reminds me of Andy Carroll.
Hopefully is just the media being fed by his agent to get a new contract.
The very thought of that wankers name does my head in. Dont buy anything off that arsehole - not even Lloris. Hopefully that prick Levy had a shitload of stuff robbed at the Hatton Garden heist too..I can't stand that dickhead Levy, feck him and feck Spurs. I wouldn't buy a player off them even if they were as good as Messi, never mind Harry fecking Kane.
I was just saying in general without thinking of the price tag although I don't believe Levy would let him go for £45m more like £65m knowing him!For that money? Thats crazy talk, I'd rather spend 80m on Bale than 45m on Kane
The Times and the Mail both running with it.I like him too but he's not proven over over 2 seasons yet, and we have James Wilson coming through as well.
Where has this story originated from? if its from the daily star I'm going to laugh myself to sleep.
If he has another blinder season. A £50m price tag could end up a world record fee.You don't buy him after one season. You wait for another season under his belt.
Ducker for The Times and Matt Lawton/Mike Keegan for the Mail which is a bit odd as Ladyman is usually the one who gets the leaks for the Mail.The Times and the Mail both running with it.
Would love him here but I doubt they would sell, even at £45m.
Are you the same person and forgot you posted on your other account?If we can get him than take him but I doubt Tottenham is willing to sell even at £45m.
Kane for a decent fee would be awesome. Dybala's type of deal... but more than that, its just too much a gamble.Are you the same person and forgot you posted on your other account?
Kane is a big risk. Then again, so is anybody, particularly strikers, for various reasons.
Would make me feel a bit sick spending a shitload because of hype though. Talented he may be, the way people have gone on about him will have put his price up. This guy could drop in value by 20m in one more season.
Well put.Rooney was 18, had been one of the best players at Euro 2004 -- Kane is 21, his goalscoring this season has been impressive, but, imo, his ceiling is nowhere near what Rooney's was, and it's only one season. Rooney had been impressing since the age of 16, when he scored against Arsenal on his debut.
No way I buy that Kane is as good as Rooney was, don't care about goalscoring stats either. You can judge players' potential on more than that.
When Rooney was 21 he scored 18 goals and assisted 14. Kane has 30 + 6. But, as I said, can't judge it all on goalscoring stats. General play is important.
So... if we sign Kane, or indeed any 'must start' striker, where does Rooney play...?
Surely not a season-long 'Rooney in midfield project'!?
*read in gruff, movie trailer voice*
From the men who brought you 'The Falcao Project', comes a new nightmare...
On screens everywhere from September, 'The Cross Field Pass - A Striker In Midfield'.
*gulp*
I tend to agree with this. They're typically difficult to deal with and we'd be far better served looking elsewhere for a more viable alternative.I can't stand that dickhead Levy, feck him and feck Spurs. I wouldn't buy a player off them even if they were as good as Messi, never mind Harry fecking Kane.