Hillsborough Inquests verdict - 96 Unlawfully Killed.

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
It might be as well to re-word that because they clearly did have an effect. I think what you mean is that the existence of ticketless fans per-se was not the cause of the tragedy.
I'm really not sure it did from what I've seen, but I'll bow to someones superior knowledge on the matter if they can argue otherwise. It seems to me that the real cause of the tragedy, as you say, was nothing to do with those fans and would have occurred regardless of only ticket holders being there due to the shoddy standard of policing and unsafe nature of the stadium.
 

Honest John

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2002
Messages
8,352
Location
Hampshire
I'm really not sure it did from what I've seen, but I'll bow to someones superior knowledge on the matter if they can argue otherwise. It seems to me that the real cause of the tragedy, as you say, was nothing to do with those fans and would have occurred regardless of only ticket holders being there due to the shoddy standard of policing and unsafe nature of the stadium.
This is true. I do agree with SalfordRed1960 that ticketless fans could often be a problem. But for me it was a whole catelogue of circumstances. Traffic Delays causing fans to arrive late. A bit of panic because the match had started. Clueless police who just opened one gate. That gate gave onto a single tunnel which led to the central 2 pens. There was no way of fanning out to wider areas of the end. The pens were already full and so the concentration of fans caused the crush. The pens were built as part of Maggies push to curb terrace violence and pitch invasions, so there was no escape for the poor souls at the front. These safety issues had been pointed out to SWFC (their chairman had called it bollocks).

Other things too. Why put the Liverpool fans in that end of the ground. They clearly had a bigger following the Forest and the opposite end (spion kop) back then was fecking enormous. This had been the case in 77 when I was there for the Semi Final against Leeds. We were herded into the corner and I was fecking near crushed to death, while the Leeds fans were sat in groups on the terrace the other end eating pies and drinking beer. Health and safety was second best to traffic flow and police convenience.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,950
Location
Occupied Merseyside
Even with today's verdict completely exonerating the Liverpool fans, there are those who still think they have to shoulder some of the blame.

Ticketless fans didn't cause this. Alcohol didn't cause this. The police caused this.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,314
Location
bin
It shouldn't have happened, the victims should never have been blamed, and it shouldn't have took 3 decades for them to get their justice. I only hope that the families can find some solace in the fact that their loved ones' reputations haven't been tarnished by the lying authorities and press.
 

VP

Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
11,556
To defeat the British state, after a 27 year war, is truly remarkable. This should resonate far beyond football for anyone fighting injustice anywhere.
 

redman5

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
5,241
Location
In a world of my own. People know me here.
I think its like you said though, those scenes happened up and down the country in away matches at the time and yet people did not die up and down the country. Clearly there was something fundamentally different that happened here, a reason why people actually died, for that, I think its fair to say that Liverpool fans actions had no effect whatsoever.
People didn't die the previous year when the same match was played between the same teams at the same venue, & both clubs had the same ends. So these so-called ticketless fans didn't contribute anyway to the tragedy for the simple reason there wasn't that many of them. I know this for a fact because I purchased 3 £6 tickets for the Leppings Lane End just 24 hours earlier at the club's ticket office. There was no mass rushing of the gates or the turnstiles. There was just a slow build-up of fans arriving at pretty much the same time in a very tight & compact area. The previous year saw a different police operation which was overseen by an experienced officer. A filter system was incorporated by the police which focused on getting as many fans as possible into the ground as early as possible, thus helping to reduce the risk of what happened 12 months later. Poor police leadership & planning was a key factor in what occurred that day.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,285
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
I wasn't apportioning blame, I said contributing. Even with the report you included, seems to confuse number of fans entering with numbers outside. When United went to FA semi-finals you would see an enormous amount of ticketless fans outside the ground, and I am pretty sure it would have been the same for Liverpool and Forest as the allocations for neutral grounds were never big. The culture at that time was also Saturday's was football.

Anyway, glad, or hopefully, it is now all done and dusted.
I've read that the "contributing" test started from a baseline of how would a large football crowd visiting an unfamiliar stadium be reasonably expected to behave. In effect the Jury concluded that the same crowd going into a stadium equipped to deal with large crowds and being managed by a police force and ground staff used to dealing with them would have been OK.

In other words, they weren't violent. disorderly, exceptionally drunk. They weren't hooligans with a blood lust bent on getting into a fight with opposition fans or the police. They were just football fans going to a match.
 

Adzzz

Astrophysical Genius - Hard for Grinner
Staff
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
32,781
Location
Kebab Shop
Not helped by the experienced officer in '88 being transferred to Barnsley because his superior simply took against him.
From what I gathered he took against him in part because the officer, conscious of the danger, kept radioing in emergency calls - deemed too many, presumably causing the chief to take a break from his beer and do some paperwork.
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
I think it's understandable if he's just got off a long haul flight and not immediately realised. He was probably barely aware of what time it was.

I'm far from a fan of Michael Owen, but it's not exactly something to crucify him over.
Yep. Stupid to have a pop at him over nothing.

If anything, he deserves abuse for the boring nature of his tweets
 

SalfordRed1960

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
4,554
Location
Miami Beach, FL 33139
I've read that the "contributing" test started from a baseline of how would a large football crowd visiting an unfamiliar stadium be reasonably expected to behave. In effect the Jury concluded that the same crowd going into a stadium equipped to deal with large crowds and being managed by a police force and ground staff used to dealing with them would have been OK.

In other words, they weren't violent. disorderly, exceptionally drunk. They weren't hooligans with a blood lust bent on getting into a fight with opposition fans or the police. They were just football fans going to a match.
Totally agree.

Human nature being what it is, i.e. the game had started, gate opened, fans want to see the match, it would have been natural to push your way in. Once the gates were opened control was lost. No different to people trying to push themselves onto the tube in London during rush hour once the door opens. I remember when United got Arsenal at Villa Park (the year we ended their treble hunt) we were caught up in traffic getting to Villa Park, when we arrived, there was an enormous rush and pushing to get in. We missed the first 5 mins. Like I say Human nature. That is why I thought strange they thought human nature of fans was not contributing once the gates had been opened by the police. Like others have said, bigger picture, if hooligans had not existed there would not have had the cages, and then this type of tragedy would not have happened.
 

Richard Cranium

New Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
1,357
Location
Location: Location:
27 years is a fecking disgrace. I'm not even that old. As we have seen, the British police have a long history of covering their mistakes. Has anything changed?
We genuinely have one of the most integral Police services in the world. The events around Hillsborough were shocking but let's not tarnish over one hundred thousand Constables that keep us safe daily, based on an incident most of them wouldn't have even been in service for please.
 

skidmark

Account closed by request: 23/12/16
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,744
Supports
Utd, and NUFC
From what I gathered he took against him in part because the officer, conscious of the danger, kept radioing in emergency calls - deemed too many, presumably causing the chief to take a break from his beer and do some paperwork.
I read it was unrelated to policing football. There was a junior PC who kept on radioing in his concerns while out and about doing his day job (unrelated to Hillsborough or football policing, just doing his normal day to day job). A load of his colleagues decided it would be a good wheeze to dress up in balaclavas pretending to capture said PC in a faked armed robbery. The experienced officer (Chief Superintendent Brian Mole), who got moved to Barnsley, was the boss of all these people - the junior PC and the other idiots - but did not take strong (enough for his boss) action against them. His superior, Chief Constable Peter Wright, took exception to this light handed approach, and took matters into his own hands, eventually culminating in some of those police officers who faked the armed robbery being fired and other serious repercussions. It was at that point that Wright, allegedly, took a disliking to Mole and got him shipped off to Barnsley as a punishment, whilst bringing in the inexperienced Duckenfield. The story is here in more detail, with more damning commentary about Peter Wright's involvement in both causing the disaster through poor leadership and then covering it all up afterwards: http://www.theguardian.com/football...-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades
 
Last edited:

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
Not helped by the experienced officer in '88 being transferred to Barnsley because his superior simply took against him.
Yes, the Duckenfield-Mole switch is what came over most from that Guardian article for me
 

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
what does puzzle me is that for all the talk of a cover-up - SYP were allowed to succeed with it I suppose

Taylor had explicitly stated in the original report that fans were not to blame

that 1st inquest = bent as a £ 3 note, imo
 
Last edited:

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,950
Location
Occupied Merseyside
I read it was unrelated to policing football. There was a junior PC who kept on radioing in his concerns while out and about doing his day job (unrelated to Hillsborough or football policing, just doing his normal day to day job). A load of his colleagues decided it would be a good wheeze to dress up in balaclavas pretending to capture said PC in a faked armed robbery. The experienced officer (Chief Superintendent Brian Mole), who got moved to Barnsley, was the boss of all these people - the junior PC and the other idiots - but did not take strong (enough for his boss) action against them. His superior, Chief Constable Peter Wright, took exception to this light handed approach, and took matters into his own hands, eventually culminating in some of those police officers who faked the armed robbery being fired and other serious repercussions. It was at that point that Wright, allegedly, took a disliking to Mole and got him shipped off to Barnsley as a punishment, whilst bringing in the inexperienced Duckenfield. The story is here in more detail, with more damning commentary about Peter Wright's involvement in both causing the disaster through poor leadership and then covering it all up afterwards: http://www.theguardian.com/football...-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades
That was an excellent read. The part at the end where the off-duty policeman, who tried to give the Hicks sisters mouth-to-mouth, was very moving:

At the end of his evidence, Greaves asked if he could say a few words. A big man with a moustache, overcome with emotion, he then read something he had prepared, to a rapt courtroom. “Just mere words cannot comfort Trevor or Jenni Hicks, or remove their sense of loss, pain and utter devastation,” he said. “But I would like to take this opportunity to say to them that I did my very best for Sarah in the circumstances. I could not have done more. For the time I was with Sarah, Sarah was with someone who cared. Sarah was not alone.”
 

christinaa

Gossip Girl
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
11,525
Supports
There's only one United!
I'm so very very happy for the families of the Hillsborough tragedy and my prayers go for the dead on that unfortunate day.

May they all Rest in Peace and my prayers go for all of them.
 
Last edited:

Erebus

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2013
Messages
966
I remember watching this unfold on TV, and just not believing what I saw. Then following the families fight for the truth over all those years. What they need now is justice. RIP to the victims and total respect to the families.
 

Sparky_Hughes

I am Shitbeard.
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
17,539
Fantastic news for the families and all those effected. Hopefully those responsible will be prosecuted and the 96 can finally rest in peace.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Huge respect to the people who pursued the truth and justice for so many years despite having skids put under them for so many years.
 

Vanrouge

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,981
Location
Early '80s Stretty
It's brilliant news yet equally heart wrenching and enraging that it's taken this long. Fair play to the families for continuing the fight. For me, partisan rivalries have no relevance when it comes to this disaster. I think most fans who remember the days of terraces have always had nothing but empathy for what those Liverpool fans went through.
 

204Red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
2,543
Location
Canada
http://www.theguardian.com/football...-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades

The video and CCTV footage in this story is shocking.
The empty stands either side of where so many died is inexcusable.
What an utterly sad waste of life and so entirely preventable.
It must be horrible to have lost someone or to lived through that and then watch the lies and deception of the past 27 years unfold.

Justice for the 96 - football fans
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
It's kind of frustrating that even after 27 years, everything that has come to light in the meantime and today's verdicts, there are still people who'll argue that the fans contributed to what happened.

It'll also be worth remembering the outpouring of emotion today from the families involved when we next hear Hillsborough chants from any of our supporters. This is why that sort of thing is so unacceptable. It's still understandably very raw for the families, the club and probably the city itself too.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Amazed to learn that Kelvin Mackenzie still works for The Sun. I'd have thought they would have dropped him years ago...
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,785

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
I remember watching this unfold on TV, and just not believing what I saw. Then following the families fight for the truth over all those years. What they need now is justice. RIP to the victims and total respect to the families.
I was living in the UK at the time, watching it live on tv. It was gut wrenching to watch.
It was at the tail end of an era where football fan violence was still an issue and sadly at the time I bought into the reports it was caused by fans. That makes me angry, partly because I fell for it and partly because it was such a shitty thing for the authorities to do. So very glad that today the families of the fans get an official recognition that their loved ones were not to blame.
 

jeff_goldblum

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
3,917
I would have all respect for the families if they saw this as having achieved what they set out to do, but if I was them I'd be pushing for an inquest into the role the media and the government played in the cover up. The rabbit hole goes way deeper than one negligent/incompetent police force.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
I would have all respect for the families if they saw this as having achieved what they set out to do, but if I was them I'd be pushing for an inquest into the role the media and the government played in the cover up. The rabbit hole goes way deeper than one negligent/incompetent police force.
I agree but there seems little point when, as we know from experience, the authorities would only be 'investigated' by their associates or, at very best, those rendered effectively powerless to punish any wrongdoing. And at the end of it, the old 'lessons have been learned/moves to ensure this never happens again' bollocks will be rolled out for yet another encore.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
Am I missing something? What's he done?
I'm assuming that tweeting about a lad farting, at a time when a decision had been reached on jf96, hasn't gone down too well.
 

jeff_goldblum

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
3,917
I agree but there seems little point when, as we know from experience, the authorities would only be 'investigated' by their associates or, at very best, those rendered effectively powerless to punish any wrongdoing. And at the end of it, the old 'lessons have been learned/moves to ensure this never happens again' bollocks will be rolled out for yet another encore.
I strongly suspect you're right for the time being, if simply because there's no way a Tory government is ever going to launch any sort of credible inquiry into something that could seriously implicate the Thatcher regime and therefore weaken the party's position
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,890
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
Most of tomorrows papers will have Hillsborough on the front page, not The Sun though. I wonder if they'll mention it at all.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Appalling newspaper. And what makes it worse is that they've always masqueraded as the friend of the man in the street.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,046
Location
?
I read their article earlier. No mention of their denial or an apology.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,285
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Most of tomorrows papers will have Hillsborough on the front page, not The Sun though. I wonder if they'll mention it at all.
Yes, just seen that Sun front page on the BBC, what the papers say. Bloody hell. I guess if they'd led with it we'd have all called them hypocrites, but to drop it from the front page entirely. Incredible.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,046
Location
?
Also, how they think Cameron being on What'sApp is a bigger story than the Hillsborough verdict is laughable at the very least.