gaffs
Full Member
Pellestri wont start on Saturday. I can see Ten Hag pushing Bruno wide.
Maybe Pellestri is shitHonestly think pellestri will only get a run if he scores a match winner in his limited time, similar to garnacho v Fulham
That's what Mitten was trying to convey, that they are worried about his "shooting". But we have seen his cameos, he is selected to start for Uruguay. You simply don't know how a young player will take to it until you give him a chance.Maybe Pellestri is shit
Maybe?Maybe Pellestri is shit
What are the other options?Maybe?
Then that begs the question, why is he even given five minutes? What is the point of bringing him on? What's the point of having him on the bench?
It just then makes his comments about pellestri unnecessary
Considering he started Bruno, he could have kept him there and brought on Maguire or Evans as CB instead.What are the other options?
So he should have brought on a defender to try and score.. okConsidering he started Bruno, he could have kept him there and brought on Maguire or Evans as CB instead.
If Eth really thinks pellestri is shit, he has other options given he he has no issues playing senior players out of position
No, he should have brought on a CB to play cb instead of putting Bruno at CB. That would have left Bruno out right instead of pellestri.So he should have brought on a defender to try and score.. ok
No because quite clearly he is sacrificing defending and Bruno can create from deepNo, he should have brought on a CB to play cb instead of putting Bruno at CB. That would have left Bruno out right instead of pellestri.
That's the logic based on your argument that "maybe he is shit"
Why bring on somebody "shit" to move your most creative player to CB?
You see where this is going?
Aside from Pellestri. Which young players do you think he needs to be giving a chance? That he isn’t?Problem is he is going to start worrying about the sack which will mean more reliance on people like Mctominay and even more reluctance to give young players a chance. Of course relying on the same dross will lead to him getting the sack but it’s what managers inevitably do.
So from that logic the choice isNo because quite clearly he is sacrificing defending and Bruno can create from deep
I guess the alternative is he believes Pellestri is a very good player but just refuses to give him more than 5 mins because well,
CorrectSo from that logic the choice is
Have a competent CB at CB for five minutes and keep Bruno closer to their goal
Or
Have Bruno deeper at cb and play a shit player out wide for five minutes?
That is Basically what it's summed up as right?
If we get one out of three as an established first team player here we'll have done great. The step up, even now is enormous.Long way to go to see what level they end up at, but theoretically - I’d be chuffed if we managed to get a top midfield 3 out of Mainoo, Gore and Hannibal. Our class of 23, so to speak.
The rest of our midfielders are all 30+ and Mount is Mount so who knows? All are highly promising but most importantly have the right attributes as players. All very comfortable handling the ball, and can look after themselves. I think if we get this right, there’s a slim chance all 3 could make the grade.
How can Bruno create from cb?No because quite clearly he is sacrificing defending and Bruno can create from deep
I guess the alternative is he believes Pellestri is a very good player but just refuses to give him more than 5 mins because well,