There's nothing wrong with being gutted about the result and the performance - we
all are. But to gloss over the extraordinary circumstances (an average of over £100m spent in each of the last five seasons!) is a f*cking joke, and even respected sports journalists are welcoming the new overlords:
This was United being usurped on their own manor. How, they will ask, did City get so good?
(Paul Hayward, Guardian)
Fuelled by petro-dollars, City’s resources are phenomenal, their depth of quality highlighted when Balotelli was replaced by Edin Dzeko and Sergio Agüero by Samir Nasri. Class for class.
(Henry Winter, Telegraph)
Other writers are falling over themselves in the rush to praise Mancini's tactics to the detriment of Sir Alex's...when they're not praising AVB's tactical nous & ignoring the indiscipline and entitlement of his players. This is plain wrong.
We no longer have a level playing-field; in fact, City now own the field. But it isn't because of talent or tactics. A few years back, I recall people cheering when Schumacher's Ferrari (seasonal team spending give-or-take £250m) lapped some anonymous driver's Minardi (seasonal team spending...about 50p, probably); are we all supposed to just say: "Fair play to City, they may have been f*cking crap before, but due to Mancini's genius, now they might be kings of football!
What an achievement! And thoroughly deserved too!" Shall we just ignore what is fast-becoming a boxing match between one fighter with a sledgehammer in his hand, and his opponent who is tied-up, fighting one-handed and wearing cushions for gloves? Pfft.