Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 42,248
This is heading towards a 2003 level thrashing now
India wouldn't have done any better bowling first. All the Indian batsmen just looked nervy throughout.One sided final as expected. And all due to the toss...
True.There will be plenty of fishing in here tonight can I advise not biting?
it comes to something when people just can’t post in good faith.There will be plenty of fishing in here tonight can I advise not biting?
Labuschagne can afford to do that knowing there's nothing there on the board to chase.Labuschagne batting is similar to Rahul. Scratching around, not pretty but hanging in. India just lacked the punch at the other end for the first and worst time of the tournament.
A good Head makes life easy for Cummings.
not really. Rohit would have opted to bat firstOne sided final as expected. And all due to the toss...
A good Head makes life easy for Cummins.
I sort of agree with it. We got the best possible start as well. 80 runs in 10 overs. Yes you lose gill and rohit but still a great advantage. We just played knowing we will get bundled out.India wouldn't have done any better bowling first. All the Indian batsmen just looked nervy throughout.
It's not because of the toss India has just been thoroughly outplayed and outwitted .One sided final as expected. And all due to the toss...
Just not the one they needed. You're right though about how well the Aussie's have performed today when it mattered, their plans were good and several key players have delivered while India have obviously not reached the heights they had previously in the tournament.More to cricket than what some suggesting.
Sure you can argue dew etc but Australia and Cummins have to get credit for doing their homework and reading the conditions.
People were having go at Cummins for wanting to bowl first. Turns out it was an inspired decision.
India showed no fight in the bowling. Heads were gone
Incredibly brave and backed it up with a near perfect performanceThat toss call is one of the best in recent history assuming they win this. Massive shout.
Still had to play well though.
Yup. India after the first 10 overs, did nothing at all to try and win the game.I sort of agree with it. We got the best possible start as well. 80 runs in 10 overs. Yes you lose gill and rohit but still a great advantage. We just played knowing we will get bundled out.
Yeah the final should never have been here, largest ground or not.honestly we didn't lose it at the toss, lost it when BJP won the elections and decided the game is in Gujarat
remember that next time you all vote
Should have chosen pitch one shouldn't theyOne sided final as expected. And all due to the toss...
Only Starc makes it into their all time ODI XI from these guys. And that's the 2015-2019 version of him.2 ODI WC, Test champions, and 1 T20 WC in last 13 years after their golden generation retired. Quite impressive
Such a gutsy call, and incredible execution. They had planned the field and tactics to each and every batter down to the tee, and were fearless in their cricket and unbelievable on the field when saving boundaries and taking catches.That toss call is one of the best in recent history assuming they win this. Massive shout.
Still had to play well though.
I see what you mean now. Tuned in a few hours ago and was drawn in by the atmosphere and seeming levels of excitement. All that seems to have dissipated and it’s proving quite a chore to watch now, as tends to be the case in most sports when one side wins easily.That's not really normal. That's India in a home WC final. Normally it's more like a snooker hall
Been an incredible year for Cummins.That toss call is one of the best in recent history assuming they win this. Massive shout.
Still had to play well though.
Already leaving in drovesI love how quiet the crowd have become