Alan Partridge
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 622
It’ll be like us replacing sir Alex.
We could go crazy and play two strikers in front of Cunha and try to get Gyorkeres and Osimhen.If Bruno went is a minimum of two players to strengthen our midfield. Realistically Mbuembo/Cherki and either Wharton/Baleba.
For our striker then Osimhen and see if we can do a deal with either Garnacho or Hojlund. Probably looking at 300k a week.
Be happy with that transfer window with Casemeiro/Anthony/Sancho/Rashford all leaving
We could go crazy and play two strikers in front of Cunha and try to get Gyorkeres and Osimhen.
That would be unrealistic but if it happened would boil every Abu's piss.
Not about replacing him, it will be about having the money to build what Amorim wants.
Ugarte/Ederson in the engine room
Cunha/Mbuemo in the 10s
Money to buy Gyokeres, Sesko etc.
i.e. no more excuses.
Cunha would. You'd have to buy in one top CM and another for less.and who would create chances for them? We didn't create enough with Bruno, if we sell him, we are going to be embarrassingly starved of creative players. We do not have enough production in our squad.
Doesn't really matter what we think, Ineos love Ugarte and I think Amorim likes him too. Also bear in mind he had zero pre season and then just went into 2 games a week, pre season is where you do the bulk of your intensive fitness work, I think he'll look very different next season.Ederson and someone else not Ugarte
Not about replacing him, it will be about having the money to build what Amorim wants.
Ugarte/Ederson in the engine room
Cunha/Mbuemo in the 10s
Money to buy Gyokeres, Sesko etc.
i.e. no more excuses.
it unlikely won’t be a one for one replacement. It will be spread across the team.
Ederson from Atalanta?
Semenyo?
Adam Wharton or Munoz from Palace?
It might allow us to go and get Gyokeres now Arsenal seem to be more interested in Sesko.
Doesn't really matter what we think, Ineos love Ugarte and I think Amorim likes him too. Also bear in mind he had zero pre season and then just went into 2 games a week, pre season is where you do the bulk of your intensive fitness work, I think he'll look very different next season.
Gyokeres reportedly wants UCL football if he leaves - The Athletic also reported back in February that he wasn't on our summer shortlist because we don't want to commit that kind of money to a 27 year old.
Ederson is really good but wouldn't really do much to offset the loss of Bruno's creativity. I like Wharton, but in this scenario he'd essentially be a direct replacement for Bruno (he'd cost nearly all the fee we've reportedly been offered by the Saudis for Bruno). Would people be happy with that - essentially, Bruno out and Wharton (plus £10m or so) in?
Been waiting for that for 15 years. Given upWe'd need actual playmaking creativity and we'd need it quickly. Before other teams get involved.
His work on the ball needs to come through leaps and bounds for him to be a 1st team regular. Improving his intensive fitness wont be enough. Its what kept him in the bench for the final.Doesn't really matter what we think, Ineos love Ugarte and I think Amorim likes him too. Also bear in mind he had zero pre season and then just went into 2 games a week, pre season is where you do the bulk of your intensive fitness work, I think he'll look very different next season.
Brunos replacement would effectively be Cunha + whichever additional signings Brunos transfer fee enables us to make (an Osimhen/Sesko or similar I hope).
Unfortunately he's our most valuable and sellable player, and somewhat a "sensible" sale in terms of age and need to rebuild heavily. If the money ain't well spent though, we could find oursoulves in real trouble next season I fear.
Disagree, I think this system puts huge strain on the midfield pair. If we don't add passing ability into the CBs and rely on trying to play out through 2 CMs who are always against 3, even 4 sometimes now, we will struggle next year as well. He's good enough on the ball in general, he just isn't someone who will break a press. Sure in an ideal world you go and spend huge money on Valverde who can do it all, but we finished 15th, are not cash rich and have no European football...this is where we need the coach to earn his stripes.His work on the ball needs to come through leaps and bounds for him to be a 1st team regular. Improving his intensive fitness wont be enough. Its what kept him in the bench for the final.
Gyokeres reportedly wants UCL football if he leaves - The Athletic also reported back in February that he wasn't on our summer shortlist because we don't want to commit that kind of money to a 27 year old.
Ederson is really good but wouldn't really do much to offset the loss of Bruno's creativity. I like Wharton, but in this scenario he'd essentially be a direct replacement for Bruno (he'd cost nearly all the fee we've reportedly been offered by the Saudis for Bruno). Would people be happy with that - essentially, Bruno out and Wharton (plus £10m or so) in?
I've read the Coutinho analogy countless times now and it is maddeningly misleading. At the point Liverpool sold him, you could already sense Coutinho was surplus to requirement in the team Klopp had assembled, not least because Coutinho was an ego moments player and the opposite of a playmaker. The improvement of the team as a whole predated the sale of Coutinho.It's Coutinho all over again (obviously Bruno is a better player but it's a similar approach).
You replace him by improving the collective team. Could try and move for Cherki and Baleba, capturing an elite creator and a top midfield prospect who already has prem experience.
It's the 100m question isn't it. People keep saying how this is a great opportunity to invest but then I'd want some names of players that we could actually buy to maintain or improve the quality we lose with Bruno.We really need Bruno at United next season, but the money he's been offered is crazy.
Realistically, what are the options for a replacement who could fulfill his role?
Captain and leader
Has bailed us out countless times
Goals and assists averaging 30 odd a season
Would actually be up for participating in a project to take us back to the top, but might take a few years.
Assume a big budget for a proven player.
Who steps up? Which DM? Which striker? We are playing a season later this summer, you know.You don't replace him with one player - We adopt a different model and allow others to step up and get a few players in, a DM & a striker of top quality (Along with Cunha) would replace him
Disagree, I think this system puts huge strain on the midfield pair. If we don't add passing ability into the CBs and rely on trying to play out through 2 CMs who are always against 3, even 4 sometimes now, we will struggle next year as well. He's good enough on the ball in general, he just isn't someone who will break a press. Sure in an ideal world you go and spend huge money on Valverde who can do it all, but we finished 15th, are not cash rich and have no European football...this is where we need the coach to earn his stripes.
I hope you're not seriously suggesting we spend all the 100m we get for Bruno on a 20 year old from Como and a 17 year old from the Argentinian league. In what universe does this seem like a way to improve us?Paz and Mastantuono can pretty much be signed for what we’d get for Bruno. Paz is allegedly going back to Madrid but through an €8m buy back clause. It wouldn’t be the first time they’d resign a player cheaply and immediately flip them for a huge profit.
Paz is a really interesting profile. A converted AM with 6 goals and 9 assists for Como last season. His defensive stats are really impressive. Profiles similarly to Fernandes this season just gone. Solid build, over 6ft. Mastantuono is also Argentinian and one of the best prospects in the world.
Madrid and PSG are way more likely destinations for these guys but we could get in quickly with an offer of first team football straight away.
Crazy talk yeahI hope you're not seriously suggesting we spend all the 100m we get for Bruno on a 20 year old from Como and a 17 year old from the Argentinian league. In what universe does this seem like a way to improve us?
We will struggle to without CL footy which Bruno will help us get backGenuinely don't understand the point of even following the club if your attitude is that we'll just never buy anyone that's good.
It’ll take a similar amount for Palace to consider selling Wharton.I think we need to give serious consideration to Wharton. A midfield of him and mainoo, I appreciate it’s young but plenty of years to grow together. I’d honestly take Wharton and Eze. I don’t want to lose Fernandes but there is no way ratcliffe is rejecting a bid of £100 mill for him