I think their argument is that a season is decided by a body of work. A season can come down to one game sure, but you can point to dozens of individual moments and say if only, and if only they had gone a different way then the season doesn't come down to that one game.
Does that make sense? ;p
Little sense maybe.
The title is not won in September or October, but can be lost in April.
Sure vs B'Burn was not the decider. We won against Shitty what we lost against Blackburn.
Even though we lost Roon for that match, we shoul've won it easily. It was up for the taking. Blackburn offered little to stun us.
The title was lost at OT. It was 6 points match and we got 0 from that. Had we won that match, the title would've been all but wrapped up, almost the same with drawing it.
Can't say anything about Chelsea, they are worthy champions. To get 18 points from 18 against us Arsenal,Pool shows for it.
Any of those matches(B'Burn,Chelsea) did us and practically took the title away from us.