ETH has started to look defeated. If he’s really just waiting to be sacked there’s little point in keeping him.
Even if one were readily available, there’s no point at all in appointing a permanent manager until the ownership issues are resolved and any structural changes (DoF) are in place.
So an interim then. A vibes merchant might lift the mood of the fans and improve results in the short term, but that might just make things harder for his successor. Given the ownership changes, and I’m assuming they
will happen, I don’t think there’s too much danger that a short-term successful interim would be given the full-time gig.
A disciplinarian might be better for the club’s long-term health, but he would need to be ostentatiously backed by the club, i.e. coming down hard on dressing room malcontents. I just can’t see that happening with the Glazers still around.
I don’t often agree with
@devilish, but he’s right about PL experience being essential for an interim. It’s got to be someone who can hit the ground running.
Who though? Potter would get crucified by the press, and can’t get his teams to score; surely one of any new guy’s main priorities. Conte isn’t a vibes merchant. Lopetegui?