Yorkeontop
meonbottom
They do have different sensibilities in that part of the world as we are constantly reminded.
I’m not saying it wasn’t a silly thing to do. The fact we’re discussing it proves it was a silly thing to do. If he’d gone with the bicep emoji instead there’d be zero drama. So he did feck up. I’m not denying that.It's best avoided to remove all doubt or question. There is already a widespread and prevailing negative understanding of a particular trope or symbol, so why even raise the possibility of giving it air. There were other very easy ways to express the same sentiment without stepping into a potential quagmire. It doesn't need to be some huge deal, but he should do better.
The problem here is that if this particular application is given some sort of informal license or imprimatur by ignoring it, others will surely mimic the same and excuse their line crossing with "I was just talking about his strength like Garnacho". Not exactly the best way to use a platform to promote an anti-racism message and stamp out racism if that is the Prem's objective.
Eventually, we will be in the "I thought he was cramping and needed some extra potassium, so I threw the banana" territory. (this is a joke , btw)
Well FA set a precedent with Cavani didn't they? On getting offended on behalf of others.It isn’t something I’d post myself, simply because I know what people are like. But can we all stop being offended on other peoples behalf for a second, and put this into perspective? It’s really weird to actually think he’d be doing this maliciously.
Which was also daft. I feel they just go whichever way the wind is blowing though - if this gets lots of attention, I doubt they’ll ignore it.Well FA set a precedent with Cavani didn't they? On getting offended on behalf of others.
What a ridiculous comment. The level of discourse on this forum is a joke.I must have entered the daily mail comments by accident instead of redcafe
And with Barnardo Silva.Well FA set a precedent with Cavani didn't they? On getting offended on behalf of others.
In Bilva's case, at least there was no 3-game ban and some kind of context was taken into consideration in the punishment. In Cavani's case, the post was not even in English.And with Barnardo Silva.
It's kind of ironic that you invoke context, yet conveniently ignore hundreds of years of context of that symbol and idea being negatively associated with black people. Are we doing context or not? You can't pick and choose and then be surprised when people minds immediately go to the centuries-old practice rather than the newfangled text speak, which is a notoriously unclear medium of communication anyway.The internet: "So why did you post that emoji?"
G: "To show support for my friend and teammate, who had just made one hell of a save at the death of a game."
The internet: "So you weren't making a comment about him being black?"
G: "No. That would kind of weird thing to do. If I had a problem with him being black, why would I post it on line? More to the point why would I post it online after hes just had a great night and saved the team? It's not like he hasn't had a few howlers over the past few weeks. If I did have a problem with him being black, would I not do it every other time when hes fecked up? Seems kinda weird that I would have nothing bad to say when hes been poor but have some racist comments when hes done well. Dont you think?"
The internet: feck YOUR CONTEXT!!!! I MUST VIRTUE SIGNAL!!!!!!!!
And more to the point, Onana now has to deal with all this shit because mouth breathing feck wits can't just take things as they are. And always have to be assuming that it's the worst case scenario. Just stay off the socials. Nothing good ever comes from posting on there. ITs nothing but cnuts chasing clout and they will torch any of you to get it. Dont forget to like, share and subscribe for more context ignoring pitch fork action. #feckcontext #feckfacts #feelingsforthewin #harrypotter #starwars #everythingelsethatgetsmethemostexposurecosimafamefeckingcunt
No, this is a straw man and no one is suggesting that. Still, it's best avoided and he shouldn't be complaining about any punishment coming his way. He needs to be smarter.So because some people sometimes make racist comparisons between black people and gorillas, that means Garnacho must’ve been doing so as well? Got it.
It isn’t something I’d post myself, simply because I know what people are like. But can we all stop being offended on other peoples behalf for a second, and put this into perspective? It’s really weird to actually think he’d be doing this maliciously.
I don't think he intended it either. But for certain measures a strict liability approach is taken to avoid and/or stamp out the questionable behavior. You can debate whether it is warranted in this context or not.I’m not saying it wasn’t a silly thing to do. The fact we’re discussing it proves it was a silly thing to do. If he’d gone with the bicep emoji instead there’d be zero drama. So he did feck up. I’m not denying that.
The one and only point I’m making with my last few posts is that it is obvious there was no racist intent behind what he did.
No need to go into bird lawyer territory here. Dont' think anyone actually said or thinks he was being racist, but the shortest answer is that kids could see it and imitate it thinking its now ok and a normal thing to do.I don't get this mentality. Surely by saying he's being racist (towards his friend and teammate) by posting pictures of a gorilla, it's the people saying he's racist who are actually being racist. They are essentially saying that black people look like gorillas...
Don't say this, you'll be accused of writing in the daily mail comment section.I don't get this mentality. Surely by saying he's being racist (towards his friend and teammate) by posting pictures of a gorilla, it's the people saying he's racist who are actually being racist. They are essentially saying that black people look like gorillas...
That's possibly the thickest post I've read on here.It's kind of ironic that you invoke context, yet conveniently ignore hundreds of years of context of that symbol and idea being negatively associated with black people. Are we doing context or not? You can't pick and choose and then be surprised when people minds immediately go to the centuries-old practice rather than the newfangled text speak, which is a notoriously unclear medium of communication anyway.
No, this is a straw man and no one is suggesting that. Still, it's best avoided and he shouldn't be complaining about any punishment coming his way. He needs to be smarter.
I don't think he intended it either. But for certain measures a strict liability approach is taken to avoid and/or stamp out the questionable behavior. You can debate whether it is warranted in this context or not.
To take it out of a race context, the idiot United support who wore that "97 Not Enough" shirt, was also treated with strict liability. I myself thought he was referring to their 97-point season in which they failed to win the title, because I had always associated the Hillsborough disaster with 96.
Which is why he deleted it in 5 mins.It's clearly a storm in a teacup but you'd think the club would have taken steps to educate players on which language/emoticons can be taken out of context on social media after the Cavani affair. It'd take 5 minutes to do so.
But then you have to consider what is the visual colloquialism of a gorilla in context to sending it to someone ? As another poster highlighted a bicep emoji has connotation of strength, the fire, thumbs up, or wink emoji's conveys a positive response in support of something. I've yet to come across there being a norm in this social media world we occupy where the gorilla emoji is used adequately.So because some people sometimes make racist comparisons between black people and gorillas, that means Garnacho must’ve been doing so as well? Got it.
It isn’t something I’d post myself, simply because I know what people are like. But can we all stop being offended on other peoples behalf for a second, and put this into perspective? It’s really weird to actually think he’d be doing this maliciously.
I agree it’s best avoided - but only because you’ve got weapons on twitter who’ll say you’re racially abusing your teammate.No, this is a straw man and no one is suggesting that. Still, it's best avoided and he shouldn't be complaining about any punishment coming his way. He needs to be smarter.
Urgh, I feel dirty just having you respond to me with that nonsense.It's kind of ironic that you invoke context, yet conveniently ignore hundreds of years of context of that symbol and idea being negatively associated with black people. Are we doing context or not? You can't pick and choose and then be surprised when people minds immediately go to the centuries-old practice rather than the newfangled text speak, which is a notoriously unclear medium of communication anyway.
No need to go into bird lawyer territory here. Dont' think anyone actually said or thinks he was being racist, but the shortest answer is that kids could see it and imitate it thinking its now ok and a normal thing to do.
I dunno, I mean, if it's an opposition fan or player who is doing it to antagonise then it's reasonable to say they are being racist because they are equating the black player to a gorilla.Don't say this, you'll be accused of writing in the daily mail comment section.
MUFC's Response Team is clearly on point but, as we all know, the internet never forgets. Hopefully the FA do the sensible thing.Which is why he deleted it in 5 mins.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
And that should be the end of it…but it won’t be! What a bloody stupid world we live in. Let’s be honest it’s these kind of conversations that lead to resentment, particularly for the less educated amongst us. So many real issues to deal with without this shite.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yes, it could be considered racist if you use a gorilla emoji to praise a black person. Images of gorillas, apes, or monkeys are historically racist when they’re used to disparage or insult Black and African people.
Be cautious when you use the (gorilla) emoji to avoid unintentionally offending someone.
That's possibly the thickest post I've read on here.
Very sound arguments.Urgh, I feel dirty just having you respond to me with that nonsense.
2 game ban for Onana for trying to influence impartial FA.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I’m so glad he’s come out and said this. Too many out there that like to virtue signal and get offended on behalf of others. Context is everything.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Thankfully he made an statement. What Garnacho meant was to compliment Onana, not to offend him, and Andre clearly understood it.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Great tweet.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It has little bearing on what FA will do though.I’m so glad he’s come out and said this. Too many out there that like to virtue signal and get offended on behalf of others. Context is everything.
This is a topic that won't die on its own unfortunately.Great tweet.
Although I do wonder if keeping schtum and hoping everyone forgets about it might have been a better idea?
So you're agreeing with lsd then? If the level of discourse on this forum is "a joke," as you believe, then it is indeed (according to you) at a similar level to that of the Daily Mail.What a ridiculous comment. The level of discourse on this forum is a joke.
Good for him to come out with that.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Feck the FA. The whole Cavani situation was a good indicator of what they are.It has little bearing on what FA will do though.