Jadon Sancho (Out)

Status
Not open for further replies.

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,031
I was delirious when we bought Sancho, but with good reason. What none of us on the caf could have known was his immaturity. Yes of course that season was a train wreck and he could be excused for his performances, but not his behavior.
 

HTG

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
5,994
Supports
Bayern
I was delirious when we bought Sancho, but with good reason. What none of us on the caf could have known was his immaturity. Yes of course that season was a train wreck and he could excused for his performances, but not his behavior.
To be fair, you could have easily known. He already had issues at Dortmund. The red flags were always there to see if you just bothered to look. So at least your scouts must have known there was risk involved.
Though I admit I would not have expected things to become this bad.
 

Baxquux

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2022
Messages
1,199
There are a few really good young English players who’d have been much better and infinitely cheaper signings for us with the benefit of hindsight. Eze, Olise, Gibbs-White to name three. Huge transfers rarely work out. Even more rarely from the BL. Doesn’t mean the BL is a bad source of players, just means I would hardly ever spend big money on a BL player unless they were unequivocally brilliant. Haaland, De Bruyne, Lewandowski level.

Otherwise I’d be capping my spend on that league to 40ishM. Wirtz looks a big talent from there, but I’d want a heavily incentivised deal to sign him. Like 40-50m up front and the rest in bonuses. Only BL player I’d spend big on right now, who looks a sure bet for any league in the world, is Musiala.




TBF there were plenty of warning signs that most of us wanted to ignore. Including me. Was signed to play right wing, because that was our problem position, despite everyone knowing deep down he preferred the left. Never, ever possessed any extraordinary physical gifts, in that he wasn’t rapier quick or strong. Just a moderately quick acceleration. If you looked at a lot of his highlights from the BL, he tallied up great numbers taking advantage of space he wouldn’t be afforded in the PL, especially playing for a top team against low blocks. He also had lots of fitness issues at Dortmund, not so much with injuries, but returning from the off season in poor shape, being overweight etc. He was also admonished a few times for poor discipline and time keeping.

These were all things we chose to ignore, because we’ve been desperate for a revival of our fortunes for so long.

He’s clearly better than what he’s shown, but I don’t think he was ever anywhere near as good as any of us thought. A big reason he rarely, ever stood out for England, even at his peak Dortmund confidence days.

Another shit transfer where the club hasn’t done its homework or used a data driven approach. We can file Antony under that category too. Players who were signed under the “eye test”, by popular demand, or due to manager familiarity. I bet if you look at the underlying data of both, in metrics that would apply to the PL, the data would show them to be shit potential transfers.

Three years ago I think it was the Athletic who used a data driven analysis to analyse the gaps in United’s on field performance and then tried to match them with players whose on field metrics matched the needs of the team. The two names that stood out head and shoulders above the rest, in terms of being transformative in how we’d play were Camavinga and Frimpong. Who were both available at very reasonable fees at the time.

It wasn’t too long after we ignored what the data was telling us, by instead signing Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo; that it fell apart. At that point, another data driven analysis by the hugely unpopular Rangnick, suggested we buy Enzo Fernandez (available for <20m), Nkunku, Gvardiol (would’ve cost about what Casemiro cost at that time), Julian Alvarez (25m) and Luis Diaz. So there is quite literally evidence out there in the public domain that we could’ve had a team with Gvardiol, Frimpong, Camavinga, Enzo, Nkunku, Diaz and Alvarez for about what Sancho, Antony, Mount and Varane cost. We also wouldn’t have had to spend 65m on a 30 year old DM either.

And this is just shit in the public domain. Imagine how bad it is behind the scenes. The players we’ve ignored, the recommendations we’ve brushed aside. We set up a whole DoF style system under a proven DoF in Rangnick and then ditched it because of a bad six months as coach and on the advice of the new manager who wanted full control. Which is the antithesis of the whole purpose of having a DoF. This club just doesn’t have any joined up thinking.


Frankly, if United are interested in a player under the Glazers, I just assume that he is overpriced shit at this point.
Great summary. This in particular tells a story it's not about 'being backed', but about investing that money intelligently. Both ETH and the club more broadly ( pre Ten Hag) are to be blame for this - ETH not just in terms of existing signings but in discarding the one opportunity the club gave him to get informed second-opinions and DOf centred input from RR and allow him to concentrate on coaching. RR signings of the kind described, would have slotted into what ETH is, by all accounts, trying to do, in ways which make more sense than most of his actual signings.

Camavinga we had a small window of opportunity for before Madrid went fully in on him, plenty of people said he was an ideal profile, and we never looked proactive. It basically mirrored the Kroos situation 9 years ago, except Moyes had at least agreed provisional deals with the player and had the club agree price with Bayern before LVG was allowed to display his deeply quixotic judgement and allow Madrid to come in.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,147
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
To be fair, you could have easily known. He already had issues at Dortmund. The red flags were always there to see if you just bothered to look. So at least your scouts must have known there was risk involved.
Though I admit I would not have expected things to become this bad.
Hindsight is 20/20 though. Cantona had his issues when we bought him (not with professionalism with regards to training and effort, but with other aspects). Sancho was young, so you would have hoped he might mature as he's got older, or risen to the occasion of joining a big club on a massive wage. A big gamble that obviously that hasn't paid off.
 

HTG

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
5,994
Supports
Bayern
Hindsight is 20/20 though. Cantona had his issues when we bought him (not with professionalism with regards to training and effort, but with other aspects). Sancho was young, so you would have hoped he might mature as he's got older, or risen to the occasion of joining a big club on a massive wage. A big gamble that obviously that hasn't paid off.
I somewhat agree with your sentiment. But I would add that given your clubs situation, these issues should have played a bigger role during the whole process. Mostly because I feel you lack the structure in the squad and around it to help him mature in that way. If Sancho had gone to City, Bayern or Real, he would have found another environment in which the demands are completely different. At these clubs you have players who show young guys like him how it’s done and who demand more of him. Your squad, however, seems bereft of those leaders. That’s why I think it wasn’t a good move from the very beginning. You would have needed some ambitious and accepted leaders to integrate him properly and get him on the right track. But what you have is a bunch of guys who either don’t care or don’t have the leadership to provide all this. So the likelihood of failure seems to be higher at your club than at others. And not considering this weakness is an issue for me.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,338
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
I somewhat agree with your sentiment. But I would add that given your clubs situation, these issues should have played a bigger role during the whole process. Mostly because I feel you lack the structure in the squad and around it to help him mature in that way. If Sancho had gone to City, Bayern or Real, he would have found another environment in which the demands are completely different. At these clubs you have players who show young guys like him how it’s done and who demand more of him. Your squad, however, seems bereft of those leaders. That’s why I think it wasn’t a good move from the very beginning. You would have needed some ambitious and accepted leaders to integrate him properly and get him on the right track. But what you have is a bunch of guys who either don’t care or don’t have the leadership to provide all this. So the likelihood of failure seems to be higher at your club than at others. And not considering this weakness is an issue for me.
I think the pressure at Unite is higher than anywhere else atm, due to public scrutiny and years of relative underachievement.

I’m not entirely sure about the older players bit, though. If you listen to those who know the players, I think you’ll find that role models with expectations were available for Sancho in Ronaldo, Maguire, Fernandes and Varane, and several for England as well - he just doesn’t seem to react to them in the right way.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,193
Location
Manchester
How much would we get for him? Probably not even 50m
 

RedPed

Whatabouter.
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
14,558
Another talent done by the United curse! Not many players (and I'd probably add managers to that) seem to be able to maintain the pre-transfer hype that get them to United in the first place. It really is baffling!
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
Hindsight is 20/20 though. Cantona had his issues when we bought him (not with professionalism with regards to training and effort, but with other aspects). Sancho was young, so you would have hoped he might mature as he's got older, or risen to the occasion of joining a big club on a massive wage. A big gamble that obviously that hasn't paid off.
If I had to compare him to an other young very talented player, it would be M'Vila. It was rumoured that M'Vila had personal issues and the wrong people around(including his father) but until a certain point it wasn't visible on the field. Things went south suddenly and it took a very long time to go back to a decent level but it was too late, his career was already destroyed.

For all we know it's the same for Sancho, like M'Vila it may not be his fault but the result is the same.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,044
I have never been as disappointed by a player. He was so good at youth level and then at Dortmund. Now pre-retirement doesn't even sound outlandish.
It's insane. People can caveat with Bundesliga tax etc. but at 20 years old he got 17 goals and 16 assists in a domestic season. The only players who've hit 15+ goals and 15+ assists in a domestic season in the top 5 leagues in the last 10 years or so are the likes of Messi, Hazard, Suarez, Mbappe...

I don't think this is just a player flopping. This guy had genuine superstar level ceiling. Such a disappointment.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,832
Location
Inside right
The biggest disappointment I’ve had in terms of how a signing has panned out. We didn’t facilitate his game; he didn’t show any appetite for… application whatsoever.

Should be one of the premier talents in the game, instead it looks like he’s cashed in before doing anything of note in the game. Tragic.

The overwhelming feeling is he has no love for football despite being immensely talented. There’s not much to be done with that unless the player has the fire in their belly to do everything in their power to make the best of their ability.

The obvious snake move is a couple of years in Saudi Arabia before moving on to Newcastle, if he has any desire to do so.

A killer in the modern game is that if you want to check out as a young star, you’ve made the kind of money that you never have to work again in your life whilst living out any dream or fantasy you have. Sancho will have over £100m in the bank, if not more before he’s 26. You can’t contest that; any drive to have a long and illustrious career has to come from the player. Hell, if he‘s money motivated, that’ll probably be his driver to see out his career even if he’s only phoning it in.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
Yeah, he looks like a lost cause.

Which is a shame. And I won't have people telling me he never was anything special to begin with.

Issues (that very few of us were aware of) or not, he was objectively a huge talent and absolutely a player worth going for.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,485
Location
London
There are a few really good young English players who’d have been much better and infinitely cheaper signings for us with the benefit of hindsight. Eze, Olise, Gibbs-White to name three. Huge transfers rarely work out. Even more rarely from the BL. Doesn’t mean the BL is a bad source of players, just means I would hardly ever spend big money on a BL player unless they were unequivocally brilliant. Haaland, De Bruyne, Lewandowski level.

Otherwise I’d be capping my spend on that league to 40ishM. Wirtz looks a big talent from there, but I’d want a heavily incentivised deal to sign him. Like 40-50m up front and the rest in bonuses. Only BL player I’d spend big on right now, who looks a sure bet for any league in the world, is Musiala.




TBF there were plenty of warning signs that most of us wanted to ignore. Including me. Was signed to play right wing, because that was our problem position, despite everyone knowing deep down he preferred the left. Never, ever possessed any extraordinary physical gifts, in that he wasn’t rapier quick or strong. Just a moderately quick acceleration. If you looked at a lot of his highlights from the BL, he tallied up great numbers taking advantage of space he wouldn’t be afforded in the PL, especially playing for a top team against low blocks. He also had lots of fitness issues at Dortmund, not so much with injuries, but returning from the off season in poor shape, being overweight etc. He was also admonished a few times for poor discipline and time keeping.

These were all things we chose to ignore, because we’ve been desperate for a revival of our fortunes for so long.

He’s clearly better than what he’s shown, but I don’t think he was ever anywhere near as good as any of us thought. A big reason he rarely, ever stood out for England, even at his peak Dortmund confidence days.

Another shit transfer where the club hasn’t done its homework or used a data driven approach. We can file Antony under that category too. Players who were signed under the “eye test”, by popular demand, or due to manager familiarity. I bet if you look at the underlying data of both, in metrics that would apply to the PL, the data would show them to be shit potential transfers.

Three years ago I think it was the Athletic who used a data driven analysis to analyse the gaps in United’s on field performance and then tried to match them with players whose on field metrics matched the needs of the team. The two names that stood out head and shoulders above the rest, in terms of being transformative in how we’d play were Camavinga and Frimpong. Who were both available at very reasonable fees at the time.

It wasn’t too long after we ignored what the data was tellng Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo; that it fell apart. At that point, another data driven analysis by the hugely unpopular Rangnick, suggested we buy Enzo Fernandez (available for <20m), Nkunku, Gvardiol (would’ve cost about what Casemiro cost at that time), Julian Alvarez (25m) and Luis Diaz. So there is quite literally evidence out there in the public domain that we could’ve had a team with Gvardiol, Frimpong, Camavinga, Enzo, Nkunku, Diaz and Alvarez for about what Sancho, Antony, Mount and Varane cost. We also wouldn’t have had to spend 65m on a 30 year old DM either.

And this is just shit in the public domain. Imagine how bad it is behind the scenes. The players we’ve ignored, the recommendations we’ve brushed aside. We set up a whole DoF style system under a proven DoF in Rangnick and then ditched it because of a bad six months as coach and on the advice of the new manager who wanted full control. Which is the antithesis of the whole purpose of having a DoF. This club just doesn’t have any joined up thinking.

Frankly, if United are interested in a player under the Glazers, I just assume that he is overpriced shit at this point.
Here here. Precisely why I don’t absolve ten hag of the blame for our mediocre transfer record under him. Yeah the club were stupid enough to give him such power but it’s laughable to try and detach ten hag from our transfers when he had the opportunity to take advise and chose not to. I know the club tries really hard to go along with the managers wishes when it comes to transfers but how many fecking times do we have to get burnt to realise this isn’t the way. Five times now we’ve done this. It’s absolute insanity. Rangnick must be sitting there and laughing really.
 

fergiewherearethou

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
1,602
Location
Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubuna
Supports
Erik ten Hag
The biggest disappointment I’ve had in terms of how a signing has panned out. We didn’t facilitate his game; he didn’t show any appetite for… application whatsoever.

Should be one of the premier talents in the game, instead it looks like he’s cashed in before doing anything of note in the game. Tragic.

The overwhelming feeling is he has no love for football despite being immensely talented. There’s not much to be done with that unless the player has the fire in their belly to do everything in their power to make the best of their ability.

The obvious snake move is a couple of years in Saudi Arabia before moving on to Newcastle, if he has any desire to do so.

A killer in the modern game is that if you want to check out as a young star, you’ve made the kind of money that you never have to work again in your life whilst living out any dream or fantasy you have. Sancho will have over £100m in the bank, if not more before he’s 26. You can’t contest that; any drive to have a long and illustrious career has to come from the player. Hell, if he‘s money motivated, that’ll probably be his driver to see out his career even if he’s only phoning it in.
Such a good post, classic talent who has the luck to make bank after 2-3 good seasons. Afterwards, he just mimics playing football.
 

SamoyedSam

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 17, 2019
Messages
87
Supports
Notts County
I watched him extensively for England at youth level and again at Dortmund and I firmly believed he'd take United to a different level. It is crazy what has happened to Sancho, Hudson-Odoi and Sessegnon. They looked like world class players in the making. What separates Bellingham and Saka is obviously a mentality and attitude that pushes them higher. Of course injuries don't help.
 

Nevilles.Wear.Prada

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
2,717
Location
Malaysia
Supports
JDT
The way we almost got him and then we couldn't push it on in time, and then dortmund being smug about it. Finally got him for a better few and few years of these.. my lord. Just send him anywhere. What a traumatic transfer. This makes sanzhez transfer looks like Eric Cantona deal.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,529
I've genuinely never seen it with him.

Before he joined, the little I saw was pretty poor, but, because I had seen so little, I trusted the 'cafe. Then he joined us and I've still yet to see even one performance that justified the hype. Not one.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,765
Location
india
After Greenwood the biggest disappointment I’ve witnessed at United. I mean technically a player like him should not be anything other than top class. He’s incredibly gifted. But the desire and willingness to fight on a football pitch simply isn’t there. He wants it easy - he should get away to a place that can afford him such comforts.

We need to vet player’s mentality much more thoroughly. I wonder why clubs don’t get external agencies / professionals to provide detailed reports like you would with financial data in this regard? Especially given the enormous sums involved.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,147
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I somewhat agree with your sentiment. But I would add that given your clubs situation, these issues should have played a bigger role during the whole process. Mostly because I feel you lack the structure in the squad and around it to help him mature in that way. If Sancho had gone to City, Bayern or Real, he would have found another environment in which the demands are completely different. At these clubs you have players who show young guys like him how it’s done and who demand more of him. Your squad, however, seems bereft of those leaders. That’s why I think it wasn’t a good move from the very beginning. You would have needed some ambitious and accepted leaders to integrate him properly and get him on the right track. But what you have is a bunch of guys who either don’t care or don’t have the leadership to provide all this. So the likelihood of failure seems to be higher at your club than at others. And not considering this weakness is an issue for me.
That's a fair point, but feels a little bit shifting the responsibility away from the player. Of course there should be a better environment that will enable success, but demanding the wage he was sign on, feels a little a crass to then say "well the environment wasn't right for me to succeed". I take the point squad balance is pretty poor and it's probably why we went for players like Varane and Casemiro to try and counter that - also appears that may have not had the effect we were hoping.
If I had to compare him to an other young very talented player, it would be M'Vila. It was rumoured that M'Vila had personal issues and the wrong people around(including his father) but until a certain point it wasn't visible on the field. Things went south suddenly and it took a very long time to go back to a decent level but it was too late, his career was already destroyed.

For all we know it's the same for Sancho, like M'Vila it may not be his fault but the result is the same.
Very good comparison actually and Kazan may be the Saudi player in this story.

I hope it doesn't go down that route, as it would be a shame to see such talent wasted. There will be a well trodden path back to Europe from Saudi soon, I can't imagine Gabi Veiga is going to spend his whole career there, for example.
 

HTG

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
5,994
Supports
Bayern
That's a fair point, but feels a little bit shifting the responsibility away from the player. Of course there should be a better environment that will enable success, but demanding the wage he was sign on, feels a little a crass to then say "well the environment wasn't right for me to succeed". I take the point squad balance is pretty poor and it's probably why we went for players like Varane and Casemiro to try and counter that - also appears that may have not had the effect we were hoping.
The fault absolutely lies with Sancho. No doubt about that. But the underlying mindset was present before you got him. And you should have considered it. I believe players like this can be somewhat guided to success. We saw it with Neymar, for example. Back at Barca he was playing at an unreal level. At Paris he declined rather quickly to the point that I believe some people have forgotten how good he was. Him being so good at Barca is partly down to the leaders the club had at the time. You don't down tools when Pique, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and others are playing in your team. Or Özil at Real. And if you do, you won't be part of the team any longer, no matter who you are. Sancho never had this positive pressure from his teammates at United, I believe. And this would have been necessary in order to compensate for his lack of intrinsic motivation.
I don't think it is always bad or wrong to sign players like this. But you can only afford this type of players in certain situations. Yours just isn't right for someone like him. But I felt you were so desperate for someone like him, young, English and loaded with potential, that once you knew you could actually get him, you just ignored the warning signs.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
Any reliable reports?
Saudis aren’t stupid.
At best we will get 15 mil including add-ons.
And even then I don’t think they are prepared to match the salary we are paying him.
 

afrocentricity

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
27,086
What makes a player flush their United career like this? People say laziness..... But I don't think lazy got him to where he gets signed as the great hope for United. What a shame...
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,147
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
The fault absolutely lies with Sancho. No doubt about that. But the underlying mindset was present before you got him. And you should have considered it. I believe players like this can be somewhat guided to success. We saw it with Neymar, for example. Back at Barca he was playing at an unreal level. At Paris he declined rather quickly to the point that I believe some people have forgotten how good he was. Him being so good at Barca is partly down to the leaders the club had at the time. You don't down tools when Pique, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and others are playing in your team. Or Özil at Real. And if you do, you won't be part of the team any longer, no matter who you are. Sancho never had this positive pressure from his teammates at United, I believe. And this would have been necessary in order to compensate for his lack of intrinsic motivation.
I don't think it is always bad or wrong to sign players like this. But you can only afford this type of players in certain situations. Yours just isn't right for someone like him. But I felt you were so desperate for someone like him, young, English and loaded with potential, that once you knew you could actually get him, you just ignored the warning signs.
All very fair points and good examples. I guess the first failed attempt to sign him may have been where we should have walked away. He may have come into a better environment at that point and if we had got him and we'd be talking different of him now, or perhaps this was just destined to happen at our club. I hope we can recoup some money and move on from it all.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
What makes a player flush their United career like this? People say laziness..... But I don't think lazy got him to where he gets signed as the great hope for United. What a shame...
Agreed, we will probably know in 10 years. But I suspect that it's not Football related.
 

BenitoSTARR

One Minute Man
Scout
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
13,602
There are a few really good young English players who’d have been much better and infinitely cheaper signings for us with the benefit of hindsight. Eze, Olise, Gibbs-White to name three. Huge transfers rarely work out. Even more rarely from the BL. Doesn’t mean the BL is a bad source of players, just means I would hardly ever spend big money on a BL player unless they were unequivocally brilliant. Haaland, De Bruyne, Lewandowski level.

Otherwise I’d be capping my spend on that league to 40ishM. Wirtz looks a big talent from there, but I’d want a heavily incentivised deal to sign him. Like 40-50m up front and the rest in bonuses. Only BL player I’d spend big on right now, who looks a sure bet for any league in the world, is Musiala.




TBF there were plenty of warning signs that most of us wanted to ignore. Including me. Was signed to play right wing, because that was our problem position, despite everyone knowing deep down he preferred the left. Never, ever possessed any extraordinary physical gifts, in that he wasn’t rapier quick or strong. Just a moderately quick acceleration. If you looked at a lot of his highlights from the BL, he tallied up great numbers taking advantage of space he wouldn’t be afforded in the PL, especially playing for a top team against low blocks. He also had lots of fitness issues at Dortmund, not so much with injuries, but returning from the off season in poor shape, being overweight etc. He was also admonished a few times for poor discipline and time keeping.

These were all things we chose to ignore, because we’ve been desperate for a revival of our fortunes for so long.

He’s clearly better than what he’s shown, but I don’t think he was ever anywhere near as good as any of us thought. A big reason he rarely, ever stood out for England, even at his peak Dortmund confidence days.

Another shit transfer where the club hasn’t done its homework or used a data driven approach. We can file Antony under that category too. Players who were signed under the “eye test”, by popular demand, or due to manager familiarity. I bet if you look at the underlying data of both, in metrics that would apply to the PL, the data would show them to be shit potential transfers.

Three years ago I think it was the Athletic who used a data driven analysis to analyse the gaps in United’s on field performance and then tried to match them with players whose on field metrics matched the needs of the team. The two names that stood out head and shoulders above the rest, in terms of being transformative in how we’d play were Camavinga and Frimpong. Who were both available at very reasonable fees at the time.

It wasn’t too long after we ignored what the data was telling us, by instead signing Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo; that it fell apart. At that point, another data driven analysis by the hugely unpopular Rangnick, suggested we buy Enzo Fernandez (available for <20m), Nkunku, Gvardiol (would’ve cost about what Casemiro cost at that time), Julian Alvarez (25m) and Luis Diaz. So there is quite literally evidence out there in the public domain that we could’ve had a team with Gvardiol, Frimpong, Camavinga, Enzo, Nkunku, Diaz and Alvarez for about what Sancho, Antony, Mount and Varane cost. We also wouldn’t have had to spend 65m on a 30 year old DM either.

And this is just shit in the public domain. Imagine how bad it is behind the scenes. The players we’ve ignored, the recommendations we’ve brushed aside. We set up a whole DoF style system under a proven DoF in Rangnick and then ditched it because of a bad six months as coach and on the advice of the new manager who wanted full control. Which is the antithesis of the whole purpose of having a DoF. This club just doesn’t have any joined up thinking.

Frankly, if United are interested in a player under the Glazers, I just assume that he is overpriced shit at this point.
Despite being negative this I feel is actually a really good post. You’ve not engaged in superlatives and it’s an honest (and dire) assessment of our transfers over time.

As for Sancho best thing for him would be to move to Saudi play some easy football where he can relax and make a ridiculous sum of money. The only hope is that we get a good fee too so we can reinvest in the squad.

Sancho is giving off major Anakin Skywalker vibes. Meant to be the chosen one to bring balance to our wings but ends up storming the Jedi temple and calling Yoda a “Pep Guardiola is my idol” all the while still being paid by Palpatine (Glazers) who could give two shits about Padme and the baby you know?
 

Glorio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
4,590
In hindsight, his struggles with England were a massive red flag. After every international break you'd have the whole of Germany up in arms as to why a Bundesliga superstar couldn't get a start. Thing is when he did, you sometimes saw moments but no sustained good performances - actually very similar to United
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,529
People talk about laziness and whatnot about why he failed. I think it's as simple as he was never that good. Throughout out football history, there have been players who made it big and then got lazy. They rested on their laurels. However, you still saw glimpses of their potential greatness at times. With Sancho, we've seen nothing. Three different managers, multiple chances to prove himself, and nothing. Not one 90 minutes where you thought "okay, I see why we paid that much for him".
 

HTG

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
5,994
Supports
Bayern
After every international break you'd have the whole of Germany up in arms as to why a Bundesliga superstar couldn't get a start.
Oh how I remember those nights. Only the stars and our pitchforks were illuminating the darkness, as we marched to the British embassy to demand what is right. Quite a few diplomats suffered our anger. But that's on them for disrespecting the Bundesliga. They won't make the same mistake again. They couldn't if they tried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sizzling sausages

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,638
Location
El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles
99% of caftards were delirious when he signed -- with an air of smugness due to the heavy discount from the summer before too.

It only goes to show how hard it is to get transfers to integrate right. All his performance data points were legit and world-class. And yet...

Only 20/20 hindsighters here would criticise the transfer when looking back.
I think it was pretty clear for awhile before he moved to United that he couldn't thrive in England. The performances for England. I think anyone with the job of scout could easily have seen that the setup in Germany was different to what he'd face in England, and that at United in particular he was going to struggle. It should have been seen more as a calculated risk, not as the sure thing it was touted as being.
 

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,638
Location
El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles
There are a few really good young English players who’d have been much better and infinitely cheaper signings for us with the benefit of hindsight. Eze, Olise, Gibbs-White to name three. Huge transfers rarely work out. Even more rarely from the BL. Doesn’t mean the BL is a bad source of players, just means I would hardly ever spend big money on a BL player unless they were unequivocally brilliant. Haaland, De Bruyne, Lewandowski level.

Otherwise I’d be capping my spend on that league to 40ishM. Wirtz looks a big talent from there, but I’d want a heavily incentivised deal to sign him. Like 40-50m up front and the rest in bonuses. Only BL player I’d spend big on right now, who looks a sure bet for any league in the world, is Musiala.




TBF there were plenty of warning signs that most of us wanted to ignore. Including me. Was signed to play right wing, because that was our problem position, despite everyone knowing deep down he preferred the left. Never, ever possessed any extraordinary physical gifts, in that he wasn’t rapier quick or strong. Just a moderately quick acceleration. If you looked at a lot of his highlights from the BL, he tallied up great numbers taking advantage of space he wouldn’t be afforded in the PL, especially playing for a top team against low blocks. He also had lots of fitness issues at Dortmund, not so much with injuries, but returning from the off season in poor shape, being overweight etc. He was also admonished a few times for poor discipline and time keeping.

These were all things we chose to ignore, because we’ve been desperate for a revival of our fortunes for so long.

He’s clearly better than what he’s shown, but I don’t think he was ever anywhere near as good as any of us thought. A big reason he rarely, ever stood out for England, even at his peak Dortmund confidence days.

Another shit transfer where the club hasn’t done its homework or used a data driven approach. We can file Antony under that category too. Players who were signed under the “eye test”, by popular demand, or due to manager familiarity. I bet if you look at the underlying data of both, in metrics that would apply to the PL, the data would show them to be shit potential transfers.

Three years ago I think it was the Athletic who used a data driven analysis to analyse the gaps in United’s on field performance and then tried to match them with players whose on field metrics matched the needs of the team. The two names that stood out head and shoulders above the rest, in terms of being transformative in how we’d play were Camavinga and Frimpong. Who were both available at very reasonable fees at the time.

It wasn’t too long after we ignored what the data was telling us, by instead signing Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo; that it fell apart. At that point, another data driven analysis by the hugely unpopular Rangnick, suggested we buy Enzo Fernandez (available for <20m), Nkunku, Gvardiol (would’ve cost about what Casemiro cost at that time), Julian Alvarez (25m) and Luis Diaz. So there is quite literally evidence out there in the public domain that we could’ve had a team with Gvardiol, Frimpong, Camavinga, Enzo, Nkunku, Diaz and Alvarez for about what Sancho, Antony, Mount and Varane cost. We also wouldn’t have had to spend 65m on a 30 year old DM either.

And this is just shit in the public domain. Imagine how bad it is behind the scenes. The players we’ve ignored, the recommendations we’ve brushed aside. We set up a whole DoF style system under a proven DoF in Rangnick and then ditched it because of a bad six months as coach and on the advice of the new manager who wanted full control. Which is the antithesis of the whole purpose of having a DoF. This club just doesn’t have any joined up thinking.

Frankly, if United are interested in a player under the Glazers, I just assume that he is overpriced shit at this point.
Really good analysis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.