g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Jose Mourinho's Utd

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
What's all this about posession. It's not that we had 30 percent of it and completely gave it to Saints. I mean in some parts we gave them the ball but it wasn't that long and also I liked how we tried to get to their box as quickly as possible when we'd get the ball. It looks a lot more direct than during LVG reign. No meaningless possession.
 

Munkehboi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,101
Location
Luke Shaw's bum
What's all this about posession. It's not that we had 30 percent of it and completely gave it to Saints. I mean in some parts we gave them the ball but it wasn't that long and also I liked how we tried to get to their box as quickly as possible when we'd get the ball. It looks a lot more direct than during LVG reign. No meaningless possession.
Agree, you can have posession all day long playing sideways and backwards but its pointless if itskeeping hold of the ball without doing anything positive with it. I like the way we are set up and enjoyed watching it.

Footballs changed, the lower teams all look to the Barcelona's and Bayern's and are better at keeping possesion. English football isn't just about hoofball anymore. The majority of the teams now look to pass and move so naturally posession stats are going to look more and more balanced.

Southampton looked like a really good team, passing it around the pitch really well at times I thought but ultimatley most of thier shots were long potshots from outside of the box.
 

Obiorahking_

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
3,559
Anyone notice how much free movement we play with nowadays? Zlatan,Rooney, Mata, and Martial were all interchanging positions all over the pitch. Sometimes Martial would be at ST with Ibra on the left or Rooney would move out wide as Mata comes inside.
I also noticed that defensively, our back 4 is very in line and tightly closed together. I have no problem with that as long as our wingers are actively participating on the defenseive end. A nice change from our disorganized approach last season.
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,168
Jose can play possession football. He served his apprenticeship at Barca after all, but he is also very much horses for courses in his approach and if the match dictates he cedes possession in order to win, he will. It's nothing different to Fergie's later sides from 2005 onwards, tbh.
Yup, in both games against Madrid in 2013, they had us pegged back and controlled possession for the most part.
 

Turnbl

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
178
In appreciation of good management - it's refreshing to see all business completed before the season's start and a clear squad strategy.

I honestly have no clue why more managers don't do this. So many points being lost in August by a lot of teams.
 

Xaviesta

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
11,804
Location
Camp Nou
Supports
Barcelona
After LVG the cafe seems to have developed a distinct "possession is bad" mindset :lol:
A page or two i made a similar point. Stylistically, i feel United's fans prefer counter attacking football as opposed to possession based football. i looked at as a club that played like Real Madrid accept they had red shirts.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Daenerys' pants
A page or two i made a similar point. Stylistically, i feel United's fans prefer counter attacking football as opposed to possession based football. i looked at as a club that played like Real Madrid accept they had red shirts.
I don't like seeing us have less of the ball than Southampton at OT tbh. Better than the LVG era, but not entirely satisfying. Good enough for now.
I'm hoping for a 433 that can build attacks from possession but also counterattack. an 07 and 08 SAF team really, that has to be the target for me. At the moment we're relying too much on teams fecking up and giving us the ball to counterattack for my liking.
 

Xaviesta

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
11,804
Location
Camp Nou
Supports
Barcelona
I don't like seeing us have less of the ball than Southampton at OT tbh. Better than the LVG era, but not entirely satisfying. Good enough for now.
I'm hoping for a 433 that can build attacks from possession but also counterattack. an 07 and 08 SAF team really, that has to be the target for me. At the moment we're relying too much on teams fecking up and giving us the ball to counterattack for my liking.
I wouldn't like it either if i was a fan. The 2007-08 United side was the best i've seen United play since i started watching football a bit over a decade ago.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Meh, 2006/07 is where it's at if you want revel in fast attacking relentless football. 07/08 was a touch negative at times after Ferguson was annoyed getting dumped out by Milan.

Don't think the former will ever reappear with United though with Mourinho in charge given his pragmatic nature.
 

Ibi Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
6,196
After LVG the cafe seems to have developed a distinct "possession is bad" mindset :lol:
It was in reaction to one poster saying that we needed to have more possession against Southampton. As I recall it was roughly 50/50, we had perhaps a bit less. I have absolutely no problem with us having 50% possession rather than 60% or 70% if it results in more direct football and better chances being created. Against Southampton the signs were there that we can be a good counter attacking team, and generally our best moments were when we were able to transition quickly from defence to attack and exploit the open space. I just don't get why someone would say "we need more possession" when it was obvious that us not having the ball as much as we're used to was actually beneficial
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,462
Location
Birmingham
I don't like seeing us have less of the ball than Southampton at OT tbh. Better than the LVG era, but not entirely satisfying. Good enough for now.
I'm hoping for a 433 that can build attacks from possession but also counterattack. an 07 and 08 SAF team really, that has to be the target for me. At the moment we're relying too much on teams fecking up and giving us the ball to counterattack for my liking.
This This and This. Enjoyed the game but it was very disappointing the way we surrendered the ball to them and refused to press.
I always want my team to have the ball. One of the reasons i preferred Pep.
I don't think Mourinho will change much but it also depends on the team we face. We saw a lot of the ball against Leicester.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
I couldn't care less about possession stats, I care about goal stats. If we keep scoring more than the opposition then we can keep having less possession than them for all I care.
 

ShakeUnBake

So, Aguero eh? Great Arsenal player
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
980
Supports
Ajax
Giving teams space to feck up a little beat was the hallmark of the great AC Milan team with Rijkaard, Gullit, van Basten. They even made fake mistakes to give the impression there was an opening while they were waiting for it.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Meh, 2006/07 is where it's at if you want revel in fast attacking relentless football. 07/08 was a touch negative at times after Ferguson was annoyed getting dumped out by Milan.

Don't think the former will ever reappear with United though with Mourinho in charge given his pragmatic nature.
This. I never understood why everyone marked that season down as our zenith under SAF. The pace of Ronaldo, Rooney and Saha was a sight to behold that year, and tbh, I don't think we've ever come close to it since. the 4-0 away to Bolton is IMO the best performance I've ever seen us put in. Was as close to perfection as you can get.
 

notcool

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
1,819
Supports
a
Enjoyed the game but it was very disappointing the way we surrendered the ball to them and refused to press.
You're forgetting that Southampton played a 4-3-1-2 with a closed diamond. A closed diamond!
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
It's all about winning and not style then?
What's having more possession got to do with style? I never said I want us to play bad football, I said I don't care about having more possession than the opposition.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,740
Location
Barrow In Furness
What's having more possession got to do with style? I never said I want us to play bad football, I said I don't care about having more possession than the opposition.
As you say it is better having less possession but be effective, than having the most possession and being ineffective.
 

Clique

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
5,249
Location
Mermania Rulez!!!...Merms come back!!!
As you say it is better having less possession but be effective, than having the most possession and being ineffective.
If that's what he means, I'd concur.

That being said, I didn't get the feeling that we parked the bus at any point during our game. We didn't have a proper pre-season to speak of and there were times when we weren't closing down the opposition at the edge of the half-way line.

A lot of their possession came not on our half, but rather them recycling possession at the edge of their half.

I saw a couple of instances of Wayne walking towards the Southampton player on the ball at around the 50 minute, situations such as these lead to the possession stat being as it is currently.

Whilst Mourinho doesn't operate the Gengen philosophy, he does expect his players to close down the opposition near the halfway line. Which considering our pre-season we might not be in a condition to do the entire 90 minutes.

In conclusion, given the conditions and the situation, we really shouldn't read too much into the possession stats at this stage of the season.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Daenerys' pants
Winning ugly is still 3pts

Playing the most beautiful football in the world and not winning is still 0pts

Over the years people remember the winner, occasionally an unlucky great team, but still if style didnt win you match it's all for nothing
We won and we played better football than in most of our games under Van Gaal where we had 60% possession
What's having more possession got to do with style? I never said I want us to play bad football, I said I don't care about having more possession than the opposition.
I watch United not mostly to win, I watch mostly because I want to be entertained. I'm not saying we are more or less entertaining now than under LVG, though I enjoyed it more on Froday than under LVG. Waiting for the opposition to loose the ball to capitalise and break quickly is not my idea of good football tbh. I prefer a well executed possession game, which we had with a Scholes in the team. Maybe it's that we don't have that kind of midfielder available to the team but I don't like the way Mourinho set up at OT.
 

Silas

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
4,688
Location
UK
I watch United not mostly to win, I watch mostly because I want to be entertained. I'm not saying we are more or less entertaining now than under LVG, though I enjoyed it more on Froday than under LVG. Waiting for the opposition to loose the ball to capitalise and break quickly is not my idea of good football tbh. I prefer a well executed possession game, which we had with a Scholes in the team. Maybe it's that we don't have that kind of midfielder available to the team but I don't like the way Mourinho set up at OT.
Likewise, players play not mostly to entertain others, but because they want to win. If all players cared about was entertaining the audience, they'd all be freestylers. Your mindset would make sense for a neutral, but for a supporter, I find it perplexing that you'd put entertainment over success for your own club, especially considering our current situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Invictus

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
14,033
Location
Sunny Manc
I'm all for style and everything, but after the last few years I'm happy with seeing us winning points and going somewhere. We can complain about style when we're back on top.
 

Gatti33

New Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
799
I'm all for style and everything, but after the last few years I'm happy with seeing us winning points and going somewhere. We can complain about style when we're back on top.
This. Amen.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Daenerys' pants
Likewise, players play not mostly to entertain others, but because they want to win. If all players cared about was entertaining the audience, they'd all be freestylers. Your mindset would make sense for a neutral, but for a supporter, I find it perplexing that you'd put entertainment over success for your own club, especially considering our current situation.
That depends what you consider entertaining. The Dortmund of Goetze etc in their final year together and the Barca of 07-11 were not full of "individual freestylers" as you put it. They were a team focused, high pressing possession oriented team that won practically everything and were spectacular to watch.
 

Ghengis

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
77
Location
Geneva
I thought we played good considering its only the start. We had many chances. We played smart and it was really refreshing to see us play. I really couldnt care less about possession to be honest. I enjoy counter attacking football and i still think this is only the start. The interplay these guys are going to start playing when they get to know eachother has crazy potential. Mourinho is the perfect manager for us i feel and he has brought in the perfect players. Hold on to your seats lads because we are in for something special.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,590
Location
Ireland
I watch United not mostly to win, I watch mostly because I want to be entertained. I'm not saying we are more or less entertaining now than under LVG, though I enjoyed it more on Froday than under LVG. Waiting for the opposition to loose the ball to capitalise and break quickly is not my idea of good football tbh. I prefer a well executed possession game, which we had with a Scholes in the team. Maybe it's that we don't have that kind of midfielder available to the team but I don't like the way Mourinho set up at OT.
I've never understood this mindset. You might as well just become a neutral and watch various different teams in that case.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,384
This. I never understood why everyone marked that season down as our zenith under SAF. The pace of Ronaldo, Rooney and Saha was a sight to behold that year, and tbh, I don't think we've ever come close to it since. the 4-0 away to Bolton is IMO the best performance I've ever seen us put in. Was as close to perfection as you can get.
Better than Man Utd 7 Roma 1? The build up to Alan Smith's goal in that game was lush.

I definitely agree 2006/07 was more exciting than 2007/08. We became even better at strangling games in 2008/09, when Edwin got that record number of consecutive clean sheets.

Still, as professional as some of that was it was still hundreds of times better than the last three years. When Edwin was keeping shut out after shut out who complained? That run included 10 games in which no more than a single goal was scored. That was fine by me.

You can't be brilliant all the time. On another day Martial scores his one vs one against Southampton, Pogba squares it to Zlatan, we win 4-0 and nobody complains.

This whole debate is being massively over egged. You can't win as many titles as Jose has, against good teams, if your sides don't score goals. At times he's pragmatic. So what? Few managers can get away with not being so. If Pep had been he'd have almost certainly won the European Cup with Bayern.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
It feels like the swagger is back; that teams fear us again. This might be more important than any change in system etc. The self-belief seems to have returned with Mourinho, as exemplified in players like Zlatan and Pogba.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
I watch United not mostly to win, I watch mostly because I want to be entertained. I'm not saying we are more or less entertaining now than under LVG, though I enjoyed it more on Froday than under LVG. Waiting for the opposition to loose the ball to capitalise and break quickly is not my idea of good football tbh. I prefer a well executed possession game, which we had with a Scholes in the team. Maybe it's that we don't have that kind of midfielder available to the team but I don't like the way Mourinho set up at OT.
For me United winning is entertainment. I love to see us beat teams and win trophies, that's what entertains me. Possession stats, number of passes, interceptions and all the rest of it mean nothing to me. I want to see United play direct football; get the ball forward and put the ball in the back of the net. If the opposition spend 70% of the match passing it about but we beat them that's fine with me.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Daenerys' pants
I've never understood this mindset. You might as well just become a neutral and watch various different teams in that case.
I'm not from Manchester, I started supporting United due to their traditions and the way they play. Winning is only part of the joy if supporting a team IMO. If you're raised a stones throw from OT then of course there's an attachment to the area itself and wanting your area/team to beat the others in the country, but I personally don't relate as much to that as I do to the enjoyment in actually watching the team play.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Daenerys' pants
For me United winning is entertainment. I love to see us beat teams and win trophies, that's what entertains me. Possession stats, number of passes, interceptions and all the rest of it mean nothing to me. I want to see United play direct football; get the ball forward and put the ball in the back of the net. If the opposition spend 70% of the match passing it about but we beat them that's fine with me.
I'm actually talking about enjoying watching a match, not wacking one off to a stats table ffs :lol:
There's a big difference with just "passing it about" and playing some really quick paced, skilled, mesmorising pass and move football.
 

RedCurry

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
4,687
I don't know what you guys are rambling on about honestly. I found the game highly entertaining, we won the game, kept a clean sheet, our record signing looked immense, our centre forward can head a ball but you guys found something to complain about?
 

Kraftwerker

Formerly RedAddict
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
13,871
Location
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
The sweet spot is to have a chameleon team that can change its approach depending on the opponent and situation in the match.

Ferguson's sides could play possession football, they could also play devastating counterattack, they could play backs to the wall, and they could play all out attack.

This made them formidable opponents at home and in Europe. We need to be aiming for the same under Jose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.