We still have Barca and PSG to bail us out. Keep the hope.On no. Both corona and the virus is here to stay isn't it
I'm shocked to my very coreJuventus involved in dodgy dealings?
I'm so glad you stuffed them
Looks like a few caftards were spotted in the Juve end at Stamford Bridge on Tuesday.
Rovella (genoa) valued 50/60 millions. Swapped for the same amount with 2 Juve U23 playerEveryone knew that Pjanic/Artur swop deal had the feel of being pretty dodgy, glad it's being investigated as values of both were vastly inflated.
Holy shit Carlo. I was on goal.com forums and he created an account to shout at EPL fans and generally be a biased dick. His opinion doesn’t matter a feck, he’s still throwing out accusations about other sides when an Italian side is under the spotlightTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh yeah they did thatRovella (genoa) valued 50/60 millions. Swapped for the same amount with 2 Juve U23 player
Liverpool, Real Madrid, Porto, Ajax? Perhaps, basically every club that is competent in the transfer market.Juventus, City, Atletico Madrid, Chelsea, and Barca all need to be constantly under investigation for their dealings.
No.Liverpool, Real Madrid, Porto, Ajax? Perhaps, basically every club that is competent in the transfer market.
Given what transpired 15 years ago, I'm surprised they weren't smart enough to make sure they steered clear of shady business. What are Juventus thinking?They just can’t resist can they Another club very invested in the super league because otherwise they have to resort to illegal means.
They are under investigation for OsihmenShady dealings in Italy is just normal business though, isn't it? I wouldn't even be shocked if it turns out that Napoli is actually owned by the Camorra.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Apologists who probably also think PSG and City's books being FFP conform is just clever accounting.so when someome overpays for a player, it's a shady business? I mean, it's obvious what they were doing (Arthur/Pjanic), but weren't the majority of posters calling that deal simply a clever accounting at the time? how is that illegal now but was acceptable then? or the "clever accounting" argument was bullshit all along and those posters were just talking shit?
From an accounting standpoint all french clubs are audited every years and it's known that big clubs didn't want it to be a thing at UEFA level.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Nah, too obvious, they couldn't. Doesn't mean they don't have means to make money off the club, mind. Though for the most part what they want is access to players/coaches/etc...Shady dealings in Italy is just normal business though, isn't it? I wouldn't even be shocked if it turns out that Napoli is actually owned by the Camorra.
He listed Barca and Juve, so it certainly aint clubs that are competent in the market.Liverpool, Real Madrid, Porto, Ajax? Perhaps, basically every club that is competent in the transfer market.
How about a zebra?A leopard never changes it’s spots.
Dock City 10 pointsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They can't change their spots either.How about a zebra?