- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 34,486
Congratulations for making the wrong point then.The valuations doesn’t matter. The point I’m making is that in my opinion, Antony looks like a worse buy than Koulibaly.
Congratulations for making the wrong point then.The valuations doesn’t matter. The point I’m making is that in my opinion, Antony looks like a worse buy than Koulibaly.
I think this was also the time when Van Dijk was bossing it big time, and everyone looked for the next physical big-man to be "their Van Dijk" - that's how I remember many conversations of him.Not disputing that. Never really saw him with my own eyes but I know for a fact that plenty people over a long time saw him as an absolute elite defender so there must have been something about him at least.
Could be, maybe even before that since it was in a huge German Bayern Munich forum(part) and VVD not THAT much in the limelight - although recognised as a huge impact player of course. But I forgot and am too lazy to look it up since when VVD joined Liverpool, doesn't feel that long ago to me but could be ages as well. (isn't actually interesting at all).I think this was also the time when Van Dijk was bossing it big time, and everyone looked for the next physical big-man to be "their Van Dijk" - that's how I remember many conversations of him.
Imagine thinking this opinion was anything other than stark raving bankers.The valuations doesn’t matter. The point I’m making is that in my opinion, Antony looks like a worse buy than Koulibaly.
What kind of logic is this?Once again, a player large sections of this forum derided us for not signing turns out to be average at best.
These types of signing are never the answer. I don't need to watch hundreds of hours of Koulibaly play to know he's not elite/world-class because of the simple fact that he wouldn't be at Napoli in his late 20s if he were
Imagine thinking this opinion was anything other than stark raving bankers.
pricks always causing the rest of economic hardships
bloody bankers and their bonuses
Does that also apply to Harry Kane? He is nearing 30 and isnt at an elite club either. Napoli could be seen as an Italian Spurs?Once again, a player large sections of this forum derided us for not signing turns out to be average at best.
These types of signing are never the answer. I don't need to watch hundreds of hours of Koulibaly play to know he's not elite/world-class because of the simple fact that he wouldn't be at Napoli in his late 20s if he were
Is he feckbetter than Maguire anyway
The only reason he was, was because of the insane price tag Napoli wanted. If it was 50m he’d have joined United or city years ago. Glad we didn’t, he’s gone backwards very quicklyOnce again, a player large sections of this forum derided us for not signing turns out to be average at best.
These types of signing are never the answer. I don't need to watch hundreds of hours of Koulibaly play to know he's not elite/world-class because of the simple fact that he wouldn't be at Napoli in his late 20s if he were
I asked earlier but was he always this heavy?He looks about 20lb oversized for football. Heavy, clumsy, ponderous and far too overzealous - like he’s in the NFL or rugby.
Its not a poor argument at all, its a massively time-saving argument.This is such a poor argument. Crazy.
Its logic that saves loads of time because even though its not perfect its correct 99.99% of the time.What kind of logic is this?
Players ageing badly is not a revelation, is it? Plenty of players get priced out of moves to bigger clubs during their primes, which is also not revelatory.
Clubs have been interested in him for a long time, but Napoli priced him out of a transfer for years around £100mill.Its not a poor argument at all, its a massively time-saving argument.
Laurent Blanc moved to Barcelona from Auxerre in 96 when he'd have been 31 ish. Zola to Chelsea about 30 (although I guess you could perhaps argue Chelsea weren't a massive club back then). Sheringham to United at 31. Cannavaro would have been 29 or so when he moved to Inter (although I suppose you could make a case for Parma being a big club back then?). Giroud went to Chelsea at 32.Its logic that saves loads of time because even though its not perfect its correct 99.99% of the time.
See, that's where people go wrong. Of course its not infallible logic, nobody is saying it is, there will always be exceptions that prove the rule.
However, across a huge Dataset, it proves to be true time and time again and I bet people can barely name a single truly world-class player who made their first move to an established "elite" club in the modern era after they hit 28
I'll give you a similar example...I collect and analyse Data for horse racing and am a profitable punter. My Data shows that horses who meet certain speed trends (based on overall times and sectionals times) at each CD when winning follow-up that win an astonishingly low percentage of the time, despite usually being one of the favourites to win their next race...
Now, I could spend hours watching replays, scrutinising the Data, analysing other form factors etc....in an effort to find the one in a hundred who dispprove the trend or I can save bagfuls of time and eliminate a massive chunk of the market by going with the overwhelming trends. Its just not worth investing huge effort to find the one winner outside the usual trends, especially because you'd statistically almost certainly back more losers that way.
So thats my way of thinking. You guys can all argue about one or two players who joined an elite club at 28/29+ for the first time and were amazing but I'll just stick to my nearly always right "if they were THAT good, someone would have signed them" argument because it's right nearly all of the time
Consider, how many have been flops (like Koulibaly) and is it worth trying to find the exception, especially since their resale value plummets if they fall short?
It is still not relevant here. It is common knowledge that Koulibaly was approached by Elite level clubs almost every single summer in the past 6 years... Napoli priced him out of a move and he wasn't always that keen on moving abroad... When he was still a top defender he faced the great Juventus (the one that used to reach CL finals), PSG, Liverpool, and other top teams over the years and did very well most of the time.Its logic that saves loads of time because even though its not perfect its correct 99.99% of the time.
See, that's where people go wrong. Of course its not infallible logic, nobody is saying it is, there will always be exceptions that prove the rule.
bloody bankers and their bonuses
Can't see it if I'm honest.I think he'll find his form again, the quality is there.
Nah. It’s actually quite dumbIts not a poor argument at all, its a massively time-saving argument.
It is a poor argument. It's not a time-saving one, more like a lazy one that you expect someone like Paul Merson to come up with.Its not a poor argument at all, its a massively time-saving argument.
Interesting, why are Chelsea fans so pessimistic on him?Can't see it if I'm honest.
I've actually got hope for Sterling and Cucurella but Kouli looks a lost cause.
He plays like he's a teenager learning his trade and the game now seems to quick for him. Infact ironically he's currently what I imagine Rudiger will look like once he loses his athleticism and recovery pace.Interesting, why are Chelsea fans so pessimistic on him?
The decline is too sudden in my opinion to permanent, I feel he could still return to form.
I haven't seen much of him at Napoli. I'm hoping someone else will be able to answer if he always had a little Maguire in him waiting to burst out?Interesting, why are Chelsea fans so pessimistic on him?
The decline is too sudden in my opinion to permanent, I feel he could still return to form.
He just looks so clumsy and slow that I'm not convinced at all that he can still bounce back. His tackling looks almost comical because he's often so late to the scene. At current rate he's on course to get around 15-20 yellow cards over the season, assuming he even continues playing and the new boy Badiashile won't drop him to the bench at some point.Interesting, why are Chelsea fans so pessimistic on him?
The decline is too sudden in my opinion to permanent, I feel he could still return to form.
I’m not overly convinced with the Koulibaly signing. I hope he’s good but he’s approaching the latter years of his career and has spend the majority of his career in a completely different league. His highlight clip v Salah shows a serious weakness in one v one situations against fast forwards which there are plenty of in the Premier League.
He’s clearly a good defender but the money spent is a bit mental.
Ake is reliable and meets the homegrown quota. He makes sense although again, the money seems high and could impact Levi’s development.
Kimpembe is a huge no from me.
He’s just turned 31 mate, not 35. Wouldn’t say he’s approaching his latter years. And as we’ve seen first hand with 37 year old Thiago Silva, a solid defensive setup can mask weaknesses and extend your career at the top level.
Van Dijk is the exact same age and nobody is saying that he’s old and trending downward ability wise.
He's only about 15 months older than Rudiger and we were prepared to give Rudiger a long term deal, so I don't see any issues there. He's the perfect replacement for Rudiger. I'm less sure about Kimpempe and Ake, so I guess we both agree with MayosNoun there.
As predicted.We are forced to pay extra because we were in that kind of position. We need numbers in cb position. And if koulibally will give us quality three years as top cb will make this deal bargain from where we start in this window.
Yeah fair enough. I was dead wrong about him. I really thought his experience was going to be crucial to replace Rudiger's experience, and I thought the quality would be at least somewhat comparable.As predicted.
He never stood out against decent opposition for me. Really struggling in the EPL.
Not sure I'd agree. The Italian media rated him as the best centre-half in Italy pretty regularly from 2015-2020. And even against the best wide forwards, Salah for example only has 2 goals in 13 games against him. In 2018/19 when Liverpool won the CL, I remember Napoli dominating Liverpool's attack so much that they didn't register a single shot on target - for the first time in the Champions League in 12 years. And similarly Mbappe has 0 in 2 and was well handled in both games by Koulibaly - " Koulibaly was often tasked with facing Mbappe one-on-one and predominantly came out on top, despite the Frenchman's trickery and blistering pace" and "While Mertens starred up front, the performance of Kalidou Koulibaly highlighted why many consider the central defender one of the best in his position. The Senegal international struck to his defensive responsibilities well against some tough opposition in the shape of Neymar and Mbappe, and proved he has quality on the ball with a number of ventures forward."As predicted.
He never stood out against decent opposition for me. Really struggling in the EPL.
The Italian media rate Lukaku so they get can get in the bin.Not sure I'd agree. The Italian media rated him as the best centre-half in Italy pretty regularly from 2015-2020. And even against the best wide forwards, Salah for example only has 2 goals in 13 games against him. In 2018/19 when Liverpool won the CL, I remember Napoli dominating Liverpool's attack so much that they didn't register a single shot on target - for the first time in the Champions League in 12 years. And similarly Mbappe has 0 in 2 and was well handled in both games by Koulibaly - " Koulibaly was often tasked with facing Mbappe one-on-one and predominantly came out on top, despite the Frenchman's trickery and blistering pace" and "While Mertens starred up front, the performance of Kalidou Koulibaly highlighted why many consider the central defender one of the best in his position. The Senegal international struck to his defensive responsibilities well against some tough opposition in the shape of Neymar and Mbappe, and proved he has quality on the ball with a number of ventures forward."
To be honest Liverpool looked toothless also this season for 175 minutes against a Napoli side without Koulibaly so it might be not because of him.Not sure I'd agree. The Italian media rated him as the best centre-half in Italy pretty regularly from 2015-2020. And even against the best wide forwards, Salah for example only has 2 goals in 13 games against him. In 2018/19 when Liverpool won the CL, I remember Napoli dominating Liverpool's attack so much that they didn't register a single shot on target - for the first time in the Champions League in 12 years. And similarly Mbappe has 0 in 2 and was well handled in both games by Koulibaly - " Koulibaly was often tasked with facing Mbappe one-on-one and predominantly came out on top, despite the Frenchman's trickery and blistering pace" and "While Mertens starred up front, the performance of Kalidou Koulibaly highlighted why many consider the central defender one of the best in his position. The Senegal international struck to his defensive responsibilities well against some tough opposition in the shape of Neymar and Mbappe, and proved he has quality on the ball with a number of ventures forward."
When both played in Serie A, not a single person considered Rudiger to be his equal… Then the German moved to England and got the hype that comes with being a decent PL player...Yeah fair enough. I was dead wrong about him. I really thought his experience was going to be crucial to replace Rudiger's experience, and I thought the quality would be at least somewhat comparable.
This is so ridiculous. When Koulibaly was dominating Salah in Serie A games, a center back pairing of Morgan & Robert Hut won the PL. But sure he wasn't good enough.The Italian media rate Lukaku so they get can get in the bin.
Salah might have two goals but have a look at Koulibaly against him.
There will likely be multiple other clips. He’s just not good enough for the EPL.
Not the same Liverpool though...To be honest Liverpool looked toothless also this season for 175 minutes against a Napoli side without Koulibaly so it might be not because of him.
I don’t see what that has to do what I said though. Koulibaly at Chelsea is what I’m comparing to Rudiger, not the player both of them were 6-7 years ago. That’s totally irrelevant.When both played in Serie A, not a single person considered Rudiger to be his equal… Then the German moved to England and got the hype that comes with being a decent PL player...
Ironically current Koulibaly is looking the player I imagine Rudiger turning into when he loses his pace and athleticism.Yeah fair enough. I was dead wrong about him. I really thought his experience was going to be crucial to replace Rudiger's experience, and I thought the quality would be at least somewhat comparable.
Looks like those are clips compiled from a number of games between the two. If that’s the worst that can be pulled out from over 1000 minutes of them going toe-to-toe then it doesn’t say a lot. I mean here’s another compilation from just one of those games:The Italian media rate Lukaku so they get can get in the bin.
Salah might have two goals but have a look at Koulibaly against him.
There will likely be multiple other clips. He’s just not good enough for the EPL.
2nd place | Napoli(2015/2016) | 38 | 25 | 7 | 6 | 80 | 32 | +48 | 82 |
---|
3rd place | Napoli( 2016/2017) | 38 | 26 | 8 | 4 | 94 | 39 | +55 | 86 |
---|
2nd place | Napoli(2017/2018) | 38 | 28 | 7 | 3 | 77 | 29 | +48 | 91 |
---|
2nd place | Napoli( 2018/2019) | 38 | 24 | 7 | 7 | 74 | 36 | +38 | 79 |
---|