FootballHQ
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
- Messages
- 18,285
- Supports
- Aston Villa
No I understand that but he's probably keeping his powder dry for the winter which can quickly go south as we're seeing with all the new infections or even the inquiry although that will probably be endlessly delayed/jusy blamed on Vallance/Whitty/Sage in the end.The problem with Starmer's abstention is that if it's a tactic then it's a bad one. You can't suddenly oppose measures you clearly didn't oppose at the time just because you have a healthy lead in the polls. There's nothing to suggest that Starmer is abstaining for any reason other than he agrees with the Tories' course of action but doesn't want to give them a win by voting for. Or if he's abstaining because he doesn't want to devalue the currency of opposition by constantly opposing government measures, then it's fair to ask what government policies are worth opposing? If this is what a Starmer government would look like then an opposition that can't win, like Corbyn was to many people, is a better idea because at least it actually opposes.
He did raise a voice in the summer against not going into lockdown faster but you just got Johnson and the press playing the negative angle for a week or two.
Election is still four years off and I think he's calculating Johnson will step away in next 18 months anyway for combination of reasons.
Ultimately the electorial arthimetic remains against Labour going into 2025 whatever the strategy but Covid balances things out much more as job losses will probably still be hurting into early 2022 and election won't be far off by then.