And again, where did I say they shouldn't be allowed to strike? Stop making things up man . I said a prospective prime minister is right not to support a strike, which is not at all the same as making them illegal.So what should they do if they're unhappy with their wages and working conditions? Given that you wouldn't allow them strike.
I'm in favour of their wages and working conditions improving as well, but that's not what the conversation was about. What you've done there is whatabout me.
The conversation was about the role of a prime minister, or prospective one in this case, and I contend that they should be looking at the public sector as a whole and not just one group, so no, that wasn't whataboutism, it was a fair question