Christ, I really don't want to have to keep repeating myself, especially in reply to people that constantly "so you're saying me" Have you seen the Cathy Newman interview with JOrdan Peterson? She said "so you're saying <insert ridiculous exaggeration of his actual answer>" 30+ times in a 30 minute interview, and this is a form of straw man
No, I've not said Evra lied.
No, I've not said calling him black is ok.
I've certainly never mentioned once negrito, because that isn't in the actual reply.
I'm really not sure how I can explain this in a way which makes it easy for people to understand.
Again, the original post I replied to said "Daglish's first reaction after hearing the Evra accusations was to say to the ref "hadn't he made up the accusations" before or something of that sort."
So it is clear, the only part of the whole Evra-Suarez case I am replying to is "Dalglish's first reaction", eg what happened immediately after the game when Evra went to Ferguson and then Ferguson went to the referee. Fergusons chat to the Referee was overheard by LFC staff who then relayed it to the dressing room (this is all in the report)
The Evra accusation after the game was that he was called "Nigger" multiple times by Suarez
The LFC dressing room discussed this and Suarez denied using the word "nigger".
Dalglish's first reaction was to defend his player against the accusation of the word nigger.
So all I'm concerned about in my original reply which started all this is Dalglish's first reaction and whether that was the right thing to do or not.
The evidence Evra gave the panel never included the word "nigger", he later realised that "negro" in Spanish doesn't translate as "nigger". Therefore Dalglish's first reaction - to defend Suarez against the accusation of using the word "nigger" is valid. Can we agree on that?
NB this isn't saying anything about Evra lying. It just means that he mistakenly translated the word "negro"